Literature DB >> 29483272

The influence of a competition on noncompetitors.

Raghabendra P Kc1, Marcus Kunter2,3, Vincent Mak4.   

Abstract

We report a series of experimental studies that investigate the influence of a competition on noncompetitors who do not participate in it but are aware of it. Our work is highly relevant across many domains of social life where competitions are prevalent, as it is typical in a competition that the competitors are far outnumbered by these noncompetitors. In our field experiment involving pay-what-you-want entrance at a German zoo (n = 22,886), customers who were aware of a competition over entrance payments, but did not participate in it, paid more than customers who were unaware of the competition. Further experiments provide confirmatory and process evidence for this contagion effect, showing that it is driven by heightened social comparison motivation due to mere awareness of the competition. Moreover, we find evidence that the reward level for the competitors could moderate the contagion effect on the noncompetitors. Even if an individual does not participate in a competition, their behavior can still be influenced by it, and this influence can change with the characteristics of the competition in an intriguing way.

Keywords:  competition; contagion effect; field experiment; noncompetitors; real-effort tasks

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29483272      PMCID: PMC5856535          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1717301115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

Review 1.  Social influence: compliance and conformity.

Authors:  Robert B Cialdini; Noah J Goldstein
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets.

Authors:  Ayelet Gneezy; Uri Gneezy; Gerhard Riener; Leif D Nelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Shared social responsibility: a field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving.

Authors:  Ayelet Gneezy; Uri Gneezy; Leif D Nelson; Amber Brown
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Effort for payment. A tale of two markets.

Authors:  James Heyman; Dan Ariely
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-11

5.  The Psychology of Competition: A Social Comparison Perspective.

Authors:  Stephen M Garcia; Avishalom Tor; Tyrone M Schiff
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-11

6.  Reach and speed of judgment propagation in the laboratory.

Authors:  Mehdi Moussaïd; Stefan M Herzog; Juliane E Kämmer; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Stress, affiliation, and emotional contagion.

Authors:  B B Gump; J A Kulik
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1997-02

8.  PSYCHOLOGY. Mechanical Turk upends social sciences.

Authors:  John Bohannon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.