Literature DB >> 20647467

Shared social responsibility: a field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving.

Ayelet Gneezy1, Uri Gneezy, Leif D Nelson, Amber Brown.   

Abstract

A field experiment (N = 113,047 participants) manipulated two factors in the sale of souvenir photos. First, some customers saw a traditional fixed price, whereas others could pay what they wanted (including $0). Second, approximately half of the customers saw a variation in which half of the revenue went to charity. At a standard fixed price, the charitable component only slightly increased demand, as similar studies have also found. However, when participants could pay what they wanted, the same charitable component created a treatment that was substantially more profitable. Switching from corporate social responsibility to what we term shared social responsibility works in part because customized contributions allow customers to directly express social welfare concerns through the purchasing of material goods.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20647467     DOI: 10.1126/science.1186744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  6 in total

1.  Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets.

Authors:  Ayelet Gneezy; Uri Gneezy; Gerhard Riener; Leif D Nelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Pay-it-forward strategy to enhance uptake of dual gonorrhea and chlamydia testing among men who have sex with men in China: a pragmatic, quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Katherine T Li; Weiming Tang; Dan Wu; Wenting Huang; Feng Wu; Amy Lee; Henry Feng; Stephen W Pan; Larry Han; Vincent Mak; Ligang Yang; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  Text Recycling in Scientific Writing.

Authors:  Cary Moskovitz
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  The influence of a competition on noncompetitors.

Authors:  Raghabendra P Kc; Marcus Kunter; Vincent Mak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Effects of Charitable Versus Monetary Incentives on the Acceptance of and Adherence to a Pedometer-Based Health Intervention: Study Protocol and Baseline Characteristics of a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Tobias Kowatsch; Jan-Niklas Kramer; Flavius Kehr; Fabian Wahle; Niklas Elser; Elgar Fleisch
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-09-13

6.  Does source credibility matter for point-of-decision prompts? A quasi-experimental field study to increase stair use.

Authors:  Ivan P Lee; Richard M Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.