Literature DB >> 29483076

Factors influencing recording of drug misuse in primary care: a qualitative study of GPs in England.

Hilary Davies-Kershaw1, Irene Petersen2, Irwin Nazareth2, Fiona Stevenson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drug misuse is a serious public health problem. Evidence from previous epidemiological studies show that GPs are recording drug misuse in electronic patient records (EPR). However, although the recording trends are similar to national surveys, recording rates are much lower. AIM: To explore the factors that influence GPs to record drug misuse in the EPR, and to gain a clearer understanding of the gap between the amount of drug misuse recorded in primary care and that in national surveys and other studies. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A semi-structured qualitative interview study of GPs working in general practices across England.
METHOD: Purposive sampling was employed to recruit 12 GPs, both with and without a special interest in drug misuse, from across England. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted to consider whether and why GPs record drug misuse, which methods GPs use for recording, GPs' actions if a patient asks for the information not to be recorded, and GPs' actions if they think a patient misuses drugs but does not disclose the information. Resulting data were analysed using a combination of inductive and deductive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: The complexity of asking about drug misuse preceded GPs' decision to record. They described how the context of the general practice protocols, interaction between GP and patient, and the questioning process affected whether, how, and in which circumstances they asked about drug use. This led to GPs making a clinical decision on whether, who, and how to record in the EPR.
CONCLUSION: When making decisions about whether or not to record drug misuse, GPs face complex choices. Aside from their own views, they reported feelings of pressure from the general practice environment in which they worked and their clinical commissioning group, as well as government policies. © British Journal of General Practice 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Read code recording; drug misuse; electronic patient records; general practice; primary health care; qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29483076      PMCID: PMC5863677          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X695309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  14 in total

1.  Patient agendas in primary care.

Authors:  William Hamilton; Nicky Britten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-27

2.  The eCHAT program to facilitate healthy changes in New Zealand primary care.

Authors:  Felicity Goodyear-Smith; James Warren; C Raina Elley
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.657

3.  What's the big fuss about 'big data'?

Authors:  Catherine Pope; Susan Halford; Ramine Tinati; Mark Weal
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2014-03-04

4.  Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study.

Authors:  P Little; H Everitt; I Williamson; G Warner; M Moore; C Gould; K Ferrier; S Payne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-24

5.  Defining datasets and creating data dictionaries for quality improvement and research in chronic disease using routinely collected data: an ontology-driven approach.

Authors:  Simon de Lusignan; Siaw-Teng Liaw; Georgios Michalakidis; Simon Jones
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2011

6.  Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Susan Maisey; Nick Steel; Roy Marsh; Stephen Gillam; Robert Fleetcroft; Amanda Howe
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2008-07

7.  "Opening a can of worms": GP and practice nurse barriers to talking about sexual health in primary care.

Authors:  Merryn Gott; Elisabeth Galena; Sharron Hinchliff; Helen Elford
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Managers see the problems associated with coding clinical data as a technical issue whilst clinicians also see cultural barriers.

Authors:  S de Lusignan; S E Wells; N J Hague; K Thiru
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.176

9.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and congenital heart anomalies: comparative cohort studies of women treated before and during pregnancy and their children.

Authors:  Irene Petersen; Stephen J Evans; Ruth Gilbert; Louise Marston; Irwin Nazareth
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.384

10.  Relative risk of cardiovascular and cancer mortality in people with severe mental illness from the United Kingdom's General Practice Rsearch Database.

Authors:  David P J Osborn; Gus Levy; Irwin Nazareth; Irene Petersen; Amir Islam; Michael B King
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2007-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Healthcare use by people who use illicit opioids (HUPIO): development of a cohort based on electronic primary care records in England.

Authors:  Dan Lewer; Prianka Padmanathan; Muhammad Qummer Ul Arfeen; Spiros Denaxas; Harriet Forbes; Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo; Matt Hickman
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2021-05-05

2.  Primary Care Service Utilization Among People at High Risk of Fatal Opioid Overdose: A Short Communication on an Autopsy Study.

Authors:  Matthew Jones; Ceri Bradshaw; Jenna Jones; Ann John; Helen Snooks; Alan Watkins
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

3.  Incidence, Mortality and Survival in Young People with Co-Occurring Mental Disorders and Substance Use: A Retrospective Linked Routine Data Study in Wales.

Authors:  Sarah Rees; Alan Watkins; Janet Keauffling; Ann John
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.790

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.