Literature DB >> 2948276

Implants in the abdominal wall of the rat.

P Thomsen, L M Bjursten, L E Ericson.   

Abstract

An experimental model is presented that allows qualitative as well as quantitative studies of the soft tissue response to implant materials used in reconstructive surgery. Plugs of non-alloyed titanium and polymers (Teflon, Delrin) were inserted into the abdominal wall of rats, with a portion of the plug penetrating through the peritoneum into the abdominal cavity. The tissue reaction was evaluated by means of light and electron microscopy for up to 9 weeks after insertion. Titanium implants were in direct contact with the connective tissue without intervening inflammatory cells. The defect in the peritoneum was sealed by a close apposition of the mesothelial membrane to the titanium surface and no connective tissue surrounded the intra-peritoneal portion of the plug. In contrast, a fibrous capsule surrounded the intra-peritoneal portion of Teflon and Delrin implants. A reactive zone consisting of active macrophages and giant cells was present at the surface of these implants separating the implant from the surrounding fibrous capsule. This study shows that the tissue response at the interface to foreign materials can be studied using light and electron microscopic techniques and that profound differences in tissue response exist between different materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2948276     DOI: 10.3109/02844318609006316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0036-5556


  7 in total

1.  Structure of the interface between rabbit cortical bone and implants of gold, zirconium and titanium.

Authors:  P Thomsen; C Larsson; L E Ericson; L Sennerby; J Lausmaa; B Kasemo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Bone formation in porous implants of delrin and commercially pure titanium.

Authors:  F Buch; T Albrektsson
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Host response to xenograft ECM implantation is not different between the shoulder and body wall sites in the rat model.

Authors:  Diane R Leigh; Mena Mesiha; Andrew R Baker; Esteban Walker; Kathleen A Derwin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Effect of implantation site and injury condition on host response to human-derived fascia lata ECM in a rat model.

Authors:  Diane R Leigh; Andrew R Baker; Mena Mesiha; E Rene Rodriguez; Carmela D Tan; Esteban Walker; Kathleen A Derwin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Tissue response to hafnium.

Authors:  S Mohammadi; M Esposito; M Cucu; L E Ericson; P Thomsen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Analysis of the inflammatory response to titanium and PTFE implants in soft tissue by macrophage phenotype quantification.

Authors:  A Rosengren; L M Bjursten; N Danielsen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  A comparative multi-parametric in vitro model identifies the power of test conditions to predict the fibrotic tendency of a biomaterial.

Authors:  Maren Jannasch; Sabine Gaetzner; Tobias Weigel; Heike Walles; Tobias Schmitz; Jan Hansmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.