Literature DB >> 29481325

Factors Affecting Wound Healing in Individuals With Pressure Ulcers: A Retrospective Study.

Azize Karahan1, Aysel AAbbasoğlu1, Sevcan Avcı Işık1, Banu Çevik1, Çiğdem Saltan2, Nalan Özhan Elbaş2, Ayşe Yalılı3.   

Abstract

Owing to the number and severity of concomitant factors, pressure ulcers remain a significant problem. A retrospective study of data from adult patients with a pressure ulcer was conducted to identify factors that may affect their healing. Data from patients who were hospitalized between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2015, in a private Turkish university hospital who had a Stage 2, Stage 3, Stage 4, or unstageable pressure ulcer that was assessed using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) were abstracted. The following variables were examined: demographic characteristics (gender, age, hospital unit, duration of hospitalization), health status and disease data (vital signs, mobility, nutrition, diagnosis, chronic diseases, medication), laboratory values (albumin, hemoglobin, blood glucose), and pressure ulcer characteristics (stage, location, healing status, duration) and pressure ulcer risk status as determined by patient Braden Scale score. Seventy-eight (78) patient records were identified. Patient mean age was 70.8 ± 13.47 years, and length of hospitalization was on average 32.52 ± 27.2 days. Most ulcers (62; 79.5%) were Stage 2 and located in the sacral area (59; 75.6%). Thirty-four (34) patients (43.6%) were discharged and 44 (56.4%) died. At the time of discharge or death, 65.4% of the ulcers had not healed. Patients whose wounds were healed were significantly more likely to have higher hemoglobin and mean arterial pressure, better mobility, received oral nutrition, and discharged from the hospital than patients whose ulcers did not heal. The results suggest that these variables, including Braden Scale and BWAT scores, might be considered when developing a treatment plan of care. Additional studies examining risk factors for nonhealing pressure ulcers, including studies with large samples to facilitate multivariate analyses, are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29481325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage        ISSN: 0889-5899            Impact factor:   2.629


  4 in total

1.  Reliability of the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool for pressure injury assessment: The pressure ulcer detection study.

Authors:  Barbara M Bates-Jensen; Heather E McCreath; Deniz Harputlu; Anabel Patlan
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Fecal diversion does not support healing of anus-near pressure ulcers in patients with spinal cord injury-results of a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Andreas M Pussin; Luisa C Lichtenthäler; Mirko Aach; Thomas A Schildhauer; Thorsten Brechmann
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.473

Review 3.  Metabolomics: Impact of Comorbidities and Inflammation on Sickness Behaviors for Individuals with Chronic Wounds.

Authors:  Junglyun Kim; Gee Su Yang; Debra Lyon; Debra L Kelly; Joyce Stechmiller
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.947

4.  The change of clinical features and surgical outcomes in patients with pressure injury during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ching-Ya Huang; Chiung-Wen Chang; Sheng-Lian Lee; Chiehfeng Chen; Jin-Hua Chen; Hsian-Jenn Wang; Wen-Kuan Chiu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.099

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.