Literature DB >> 29481055

Top-Down Proteomics Enables Comparative Analysis of Brain Proteoforms Between Mouse Strains.

Roderick G Davis1, Hae-Min Park1, Kyunggon Kim1, Joseph B Greer1, Ryan T Fellers1, Richard D LeDuc1, Elena V Romanova2, Stanislav S Rubakhin2, Jonathan A Zombeck3, Cong Wu2, Peter M Yau4, Peng Gao1, Alexandra J van Nispen1, Steven M Patrie1, Paul M Thomas1, Jonathan V Sweedler2, Justin S Rhodes3, Neil L Kelleher1.   

Abstract

Over the past decade, advances in mass spectrometry-based proteomics have accelerated brain proteome research aimed at studying the expression, dynamic modification, interaction and function of proteins in the nervous system that are associated with physiological and behavioral processes. With the latest hardware and software improvements in top-down mass spectrometry, the technology has expanded from mere protein profiling to high-throughput identification and quantification of intact proteoforms. Murine systems are broadly used as models to study human diseases. Neuroscientists specifically study the mouse brain from inbred strains to help understand how strain-specific genotype and phenotype affect development, functioning, and disease progression. This work describes the first application of label-free quantitative top-down proteomics to the analysis of the mouse brain proteome. Operating in discovery mode, we determined physiochemical differences in brain tissue from four healthy inbred strains, C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, FVB/NJ, and BALB/cByJ, after probing their intact proteome in the 3.5-30 kDa mass range. We also disseminate these findings using a new tool for top-down proteomics, TDViewer and cataloged them in a newly established Mouse Brain Proteoform Atlas. The analysis of brain tissues from the four strains identified 131 gene products leading to the full characterization of 343 of the 593 proteoforms identified. Within the results, singly and doubly phosphorylated ARPP-21 proteoforms, known to inhibit calmodulin, were differentially expressed across the four strains. Gene ontology (GO) analysis for detected differentially expressed proteoforms also helps to illuminate the similarities and dissimilarities in phenotypes among these inbred strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29481055      PMCID: PMC5861018          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  42 in total

Review 1.  The regulation of protein function by multisite phosphorylation--a 25 year update.

Authors:  P Cohen
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 13.807

2.  Unusual behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  J N Crawley
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Drugs of abuse modulate the phosphorylation of ARPP-21, a cyclic AMP-regulated phosphoprotein enriched in the basal ganglia.

Authors:  G L Caporaso; J A Bibb; G L Snyder; C Valle; S Rakhilin; A A Fienberg; H C Hemmings; A C Nairn; P Greengard
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2000-07-10       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 4.  Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies.

Authors:  J N Crawley; J K Belknap; A Collins; J C Crabbe; W Frankel; N Henderson; R J Hitzemann; S C Maxson; L L Miner; A J Silva; J M Wehner; A Wynshaw-Boris; R Paylor
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Distinguishing mouse strains by proteomic analysis of pelage hair.

Authors:  Robert H Rice; David M Rocke; Hua-Sheng Tsai; Kathleen A Silva; Young Jin Lee; John P Sundberg
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 6.  Cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the neurotoxicity of opioid and psychostimulant drugs.

Authors:  Teresa Cunha-Oliveira; Ana Cristina Rego; Catarina R Oliveira
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2008-03-27

7.  Hippocampal gene expression profiling across eight mouse inbred strains: towards understanding the molecular basis for behaviour.

Authors:  Cathy Fernandes; Jose L Paya-Cano; Frans Sluyter; Ursula D'Souza; Robert Plomin; Leonard C Schalkwyk
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  The C-score: a Bayesian framework to sharply improve proteoform scoring in high-throughput top down proteomics.

Authors:  Richard D LeDuc; Ryan T Fellers; Bryan P Early; Joseph B Greer; Paul M Thomas; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Differentiating inbred mouse strains from each other and those with single gene mutations using hair proteomics.

Authors:  Robert H Rice; Katie M Bradshaw; Blythe P Durbin-Johnson; David M Rocke; Richard A Eigenheer; Brett S Phinney; John P Sundberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Proteomic analysis of HDL from inbred mouse strains implicates APOE associated with HDL in reduced cholesterol efflux capacity via the ABCA1 pathway.

Authors:  Nathalie Pamir; Patrick Hutchins; Graziella Ronsein; Tomas Vaisar; Catherine A Reardon; Godfrey S Getz; Aldons J Lusis; Jay W Heinecke
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 5.922

View more
  8 in total

1.  Multidimensional Top-Down Proteomics of Brain-Region-Specific Mouse Brain Proteoforms Responsive to Cocaine and Estradiol.

Authors:  Hae-Min Park; Rosalba Satta; Roderick G Davis; Young Ah Goo; Richard D LeDuc; Ryan T Fellers; Joseph B Greer; Elena V Romanova; Stanislav S Rubakhin; Rex Tai; Paul M Thomas; Jonathan V Sweedler; Neil L Kelleher; Steven M Patrie; Amy W Lasek
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Accurate Estimation of Context-Dependent False Discovery Rates in Top-Down Proteomics.

Authors:  Richard D LeDuc; Ryan T Fellers; Bryan P Early; Joseph B Greer; Daniel P Shams; Paul M Thomas; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 3.  Identification and Quantification of Proteoforms by Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Leah V Schaffer; Robert J Millikin; Rachel M Miller; Lissa C Anderson; Ryan T Fellers; Ying Ge; Neil L Kelleher; Richard D LeDuc; Xiaowen Liu; Samuel H Payne; Liangliang Sun; Paul M Thomas; Trisha Tucholski; Zhe Wang; Si Wu; Zhijie Wu; Dahang Yu; Michael R Shortreed; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Ion Activation Methods for Peptides and Proteins.

Authors:  Luis A Macias; Inês C Santos; Jennifer S Brodbelt
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Enhancing Top-Down Proteomics of Brain Tissue with FAIMS.

Authors:  James M Fulcher; Aman Makaju; Ronald J Moore; Mowei Zhou; David A Bennett; Philip L De Jager; Wei-Jun Qian; Ljiljana Paša-Tolić; Vladislav A Petyuk
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 6.  Neurodegenerative Proteinopathies in the Proteoform Spectrum-Tools and Challenges.

Authors:  Aneeqa Noor; Saima Zafar; Inga Zerr
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  FLASHIda enables intelligent data acquisition for top-down proteomics to boost proteoform identification counts.

Authors:  Kyowon Jeong; Maša Babović; Vladimir Gorshkov; Jihyung Kim; Ole N Jensen; Oliver Kohlbacher
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Proteotyping of knockout mouse strains reveals sex- and strain-specific signatures in blood plasma.

Authors:  Yassene Mohammed; Sarah A Michaud; Helena Pětrošová; Juncong Yang; Milan Ganguly; David Schibli; Ann M Flenniken; Lauryl M J Nutter; Hibret A Adissu; K C Kent Lloyd; Colin McKerlie; Christoph H Borchers
Journal:  NPJ Syst Biol Appl       Date:  2021-05-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.