| Literature DB >> 29479800 |
Alexandra Castilho1, Gernot Beihammer1, Christina Pfeiffer1, Kathrin Göritzer1, Laura Montero-Morales1, Ulrike Vavra1, Daniel Maresch2, Clemens Grünwald-Gruber2, Friedrich Altmann2, Herta Steinkellner1, Richard Strasser1.
Abstract
N-glycosylation is critical for recombinant glycoprotein production as it influences the heterogeneity of products and affects their biological function. In m<span class="Gene">ost eukaryotes, the oligosaccharyltransferase is the central-protein complex facilitating the N-glycosylation of proteins in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Not all potential N-glycosylation sites are recognized in vivo and the site occupancy can vary in different expression systems, resulting in underglycosylation of recombinant glycoproteins. To overcome this limitation in plants, we expressed LmSTT3D, a single-subunit oligosaccharyltransferase from the protozoan Leishmania major transiently in Nicotiana benthamiana, a well-established production platform for recombinant proteins. A fluorescent protein-tagged LmSTT3D variant was predominately found in the ER and co-located with plant oligosaccharyltransferase subunits. Co-expression of LmSTT3D with immunoglobulins and other recombinant human glycoproteins resulted in a substantially increased N-glycosylation site occupancy on all N-glycosylation sites except those that were already more than 90% occupied. Our results show that the heterologous expression of LmSTT3D is a versatile tool to increase N-glycosylation efficiency in plants.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Nicotiana benthamianazzm321990; N-glycosylation; glyco-engineering; oligosaccharyltransferase; plant-made pharmaceuticals
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29479800 PMCID: PMC6131413 DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12906
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Biotechnol J ISSN: 1467-7644 Impact factor: 9.803
Figure 1Underglycosylation is observed on transiently expressed IgG and on SP‐Fc. (a) A monoclonal IgG antibody was transiently expressed in N. benthamiana wild‐type plants. The IgG protein was purified 2 days after infiltration, separated by SDS‐PAGE and silver‐stained. The presence of glycosylated and nonglycosylated variants is indicated. The 25 kDa band represents the light chain. (b) A monoclonal antibody purified from N. benthamiana wild‐type (WT) or ΔXT/FT was digested with trypsin and subjected to LC‐ESI‐MS analysis. The mass [M + 2H]2+ of the nonglycosylated peptide EEQYNSTYR carrying the Fc‐N‐glycosylation site (Asn297) and the major glycosylated peaks [M + 2H]2+ and [M + 3H]3+ are depicted. Peak labels were made according to the ProGlycAn system (http://www.proglycan.com), and the glycan illustrations are drawn according to the nomenclature from the Consortium for Functional Glycomics. (c) SP‐Fc was expressed in N. benthamiana ΔXT/FT, and protein was extracted 24 h after infiltration and subjected to PNGase F digestion. Immunoblot detection was performed with anti‐IgG antibodies.
Figure 2LmSTT3D‐GFP accumulates in the ER and Golgi. (a) Schematic representation of the UBQ10:LmSTT3D‐GFP expression vector. LB: left border; Pnos: nopaline synthase gene promoter; Hyg: hygromycin B phosphotransferase gene; Tnos: nopaline synthase gene terminator; UBQ10: A. thaliana ubiquitin‐10 promoter; LmSTT3D: L. major catalytic OST subunit STT3D open reading frame; GFP: green fluorescent protein; g7T: agrobacterium gene 7 terminator; RB: right border. (b) Topology of LmSTT3D and A. thaliana STT3A (AtSTT3A). The transmembrane domain regions and their topology were obtained using the HMMTop prediction program (http://www.enzim.hu/hmmtop/). The illustration was generated using TMRPres2D visualization (http://bioinformatics.biol.uoa.gr/TMRPres2D/). (c) Immunoblot (with anti‐GFP antibodies) of LmSTT3D‐GFP transiently expressed in N. benthamiana. (d) LmSTT3D‐GFP was either expressed alone or in combination with the ER‐marker OST4B‐mRFP and the Golgi‐marker GnTI‐mRFP in N. benthamiana leaf epidermal cells. Analysis of fluorescent proteins was carried out by confocal laser scanning microscopy at the indicated time after infiltration. Bars = 5 μm. Expression of AtSTT3A‐GFP is shown for comparison.
Figure 3LmSTT3D‐GFP co‐expression increases the N‐glycosylation site occupancy on SP‐Fc. SP‐Fc was transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves together with UBQ10:LmSTT3D‐GFP. (a) Proteins were extracted from wild‐type 2 days postinfiltration and subjected to SDS‐PAGE and immunoblotting using anti‐IgG heavy chain (HC) antibodies. (b) SDS‐PAGE and Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining of SP‐Fc purified from ΔXT/FT. (c) LC‐ESI‐MS analysis of tryptic glycopeptides from SP‐Fc expressed in ΔXT/FT. In the shown spectra, the peak at 595.25 ([M + 2H]2+) is assigned to the nonglycosylated peptide EEQYNSTYR, and the peaks at 830.33 ([M + 3H]3+) and 1244.8 ([M + 2H]2+) are assigned to the complex N‐glycan GnGn (nomenclature according to the ProGlycAn system: http://www.proglycan.com).
Comparison of the LmSTT3D‐GFP effect on N‐glycosylation of recombinant glycoproteins expressed in ΔXT/FT
| Protein | N‐glycosylation site (GS) | % glycosylated | % glycosylated + LmSTT3D | % increase | Number of repetitions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fc | GS1 NST | 56 ± 3 | 93 ± 2 | 66 | 3 |
| IgG | GS1 NST | 87 ± 5 | 98 ± 4 | 13 | 3 |
| IgE | GS3 NKT | 20 ± 7 | 36 ± 3 | 80 | 2 |
| GS5 NLT | 40 ± 11 | 91 ± 3 | 128 | ||
| GS6 NHS | <2 ± 3 | 63 ± 4 | >1000 | ||
| IgA1 | GS1 NLT | 96 ± 0 | 94 ± 4 | 2 | |
| GS2 NVS | 59 ± 1 | 95 ± 4 | 60 | ||
| EPO‐Fc | GS1 NIT | 60 ± 5 | 81 ± 3 | 35 | 2 |
| GS3 NSS | 95 ± 2 | 93 ± 0 | |||
| GS4 NST | 90 ± 1 | 99 ± 2 | 10 | ||
| IFN‐γ | GS1 + GS2 | 20 ± 7 | 67 ± 12 | 235 | 5 |
Mean values + standard deviation from independent experiments (biological replicates) are shown. The glycosylation site occupancy of IFN‐γ was calculated by quantification of bands from immunoblots. All other values are derived from MS‐based quantification of peptides from purified proteins. Please note, due to an incomplete proteolytic digestion, no reliable quantification of GS2 from EPO‐Fc could be performed.
Figure 4The N‐glycan site occupancy of fully assembled IgG in the presence or absence of LmSTT3D‐GFP was determined using LC‐ESI‐MS. The peaks corresponding to unglycosylated (green), hemi‐glycosylated (blue, one N‐glycan) and fully glycosylated (red, two N‐glycans) IgG (HIV‐neutralizing antibody 2G12) are highlighted. Multiple peaks represent different glycoforms (complex N‐glycan GnGn, oligomannosidic glycans) and variations in the clipping of C‐terminal lysine. Please note, the clipping of lysine is not found on variants carrying oligomannosidic N‐glycans indicating that this processing reaction occurs in a post‐ER compartment.
Figure 5LmSTT3D‐GFP enhances the N‐glycosylation efficiency of different recombinant proteins when transiently expressed in N. benthamiana. (a) Human IgE was expressed in ΔXT/FT in the presence (+) or absence (−) of LmSTT3D‐GFP, and the purified IgE was analysed by SDS‐PAGE and Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) staining. (b) Human IgA1 was expressed in ΔXT/FT, and total protein extracts were analysed by immunoblotting with antibodies against the alpha heavy chain and the kappa light chain (anti‐IgA). (c) EPO‐Fc was expressed in ΔXT/FT, purified and subjected to SDS‐PAGE and CBB staining. (d) Expression of IFN‐γ‐HA in the presence (+) or absence (−) of LmSTT3D‐GFP. Protein extracts were subjected to SDS‐PAGE and immunoblotting using anti‐HA antibodies. The migration position of the nonglycosylated (0), mono‐ (1) and di‐glycosylated (2) IFN‐γ‐HA protein is indicated. (e) PNGase F digestion of IFN‐γ‐HA co‐expressed with LmSTT3D‐GFP.
Figure 6Attachment of the HDEL tetrapeptide improves ER localization of LmSTT3D‐GFP and does not interfere with its functionality. (a) Schematic illustration of the UBQ10:LmSTT3D‐GFP‐HDEL expression vector. For abbreviations, see legend of Figure 2. (b) LmSTT3D‐GFP‐HDEL was either expressed alone or in combination with the ER‐marker OST4B‐mRFP in wild‐type leaf epidermal cells. Images were acquired two days postinfiltration. Bars = 5 μm. (c) SDS‐PAGE and immunoblotting of IFN‐γ‐HA expressed in ΔXT/FT in the presence (+) or absence (−) of LmSTT3D‐GFP‐HDEL. Quantification of IFN‐γ‐HA protein bands upon expression in ΔXT/FT. The diagram shows mean values plus standard deviation from at least five biological replicates.