| Literature DB >> 29479514 |
Melissa M Stamates1, John M Lee2, Ryan T Merrell3, Michael J Shinners4, Ricky H Wong5.
Abstract
In the absence of significant extracranial disease, patients with solitary brain metastases have shown benefit with resection. Brain lesions due to endometrial cancer are uncommon, and the only described skull base involvement is limited to the pituitary gland. We report the case of a 60-year-old female with endometrial cancer who presented with weeks of right cheek pain and numbness that was accompanied by headaches. We describe the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and surgical resection of a solitary endometrial metastasis involving the infratemporal fossa, middle fossa, cavernous sinus, trigeminal nerve, and nasal sinuses. Due to extensive nasal and lateral involvement, a combined open and endoscopic approach was planned. The patient was discharged home without complication. She underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. Despite its suspected indolent course, intracranial endometrial adenocarcinoma metastases are gaining higher prevalence. This case report documents the first direct neural spread of an endometrial primary, and highlights the potential for extra-axial sites of metastasis.Entities:
Keywords: anatomic pathology; endometrial carcinoma; endoscopic endonasal approach; middle fossa lesion; neuro-oncology; skull base metastasis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29479514 PMCID: PMC5823696 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1635098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurol Surg Rep ISSN: 2193-6358
Fig. 1Histologic specimen of trigeminal nerve stained with hematoxylin and eosin at 10× magnification. Arrow delineates normal cranial nerve, with inner foci of tumor. The immunostains on the specimen showed that it was positive for OSCAR, pankeratin, CD8/18, ER (estrogen receptors), and PR (progesterone receptors). The immunochemical and focal histological findings were similar to that seen in the previous uterine specimen.
Fig. 2Axial magnetic resonance imaging at level of right trigeminal root on presentation (left) and after resection (right).
Fig. 3Coronal magnetic resonance imaging at root of zygoma on presentation (left) and after resection (right).
Endometrial intracranial disease reported in the literature after 2007
| Authors and year | No. of cases | Median age at diagnosis of IC disease (y) | Location of brain lesions | Multiple brain metastases | EC disease present | Treatment | Median survival after diagnosis of IC (mo) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Al-Mujaini et al, 2008
| 1 | 69 | ST | Yes | Yes | NS | NS |
|
Monaco et al, 2008
| 6 | 60 |
| NS | NS | RT (6) | 7 |
|
Ramirez et al, 2008
| 1 | 61 | ST | Yes | No | RT | 17 |
|
Asensio et al, 2009
| 1 | 72 | LM | No | No | RT + CHT | 4 |
|
Srikantia et al, 2009
| 1 | 41 | ST | Yes | Yes | RT | NS |
|
Forster et al, 2011
| 1 | 58 | ST | Yes | Yes | RT + CHT | 10 |
|
Cabuk-Comert et al, 2012
| 2 | NS | IT (2) | Yes = 1, No = 1 | Yes = 2 | RT (1) | 17.5 |
|
Gulsen and Terzi, 2013
| 1 | 71 | ST + IT | Yes | No | Surgery + RT + CHT | 9 |
|
Nassir et al, 2014
| 1 | 74 | ST | Yes | No | Surgery + RT | 13 |
|
Gressel et al, 2015
| 22 | 56 |
| Yes = 14, No = 8 | Yes = 17, No = 5 | Surgery (1), RT (15), Surgery + RT (2), Pall (4) | 4.5 |
|
Kim et al, 2015
| 19 | 58 (mean) | NS | Yes = 8, No = 11 | Yes = 8, No = 11 | Surgery + RT (9), RT (5), Pall (2), CHT (3) | 23 (mean) |
|
Sawada et al, 2016
| 1 | 40 | IT | No | Yes | Surgery + RT | 144 |
|
Uccella et al, 2016
| 18 | 64 | ST (12), IT (2), ST + IT (4) | Yes = 9, No = 9 | Yes = 11, No = 7 | RT (6), RT + CHT (1), Surgery + RT (8), Pall (3) | 6.5 |
|
Kimyon et al, 2017
| 1 | 69 |
| No | No | Surgery + RT | 21 |
|
Toyoshima et al, 2017
| 2 | 62 | LM | No | NS | Pall | 1.5 |
Abbreviations: CHT, chemotherapy; EC, extracranial; IC, intracranial; IT, infratentorial; LM, leptomeningeal; NS, not stated; Pall, palliative care; RT, radiotherapy; ST, supratentorial.
Stated “brain metastases” or “cerebral mass” without further detail.