Literature DB >> 29477609

Learning what to expect and when to expect it involves dissociable neural systems.

Andrew R Delamater1, Brandon Chen2, Helen Nasser2, Karim Elayouby2.   

Abstract

Two experiments with Long-Evans rats examined the potential independence of learning about different features of food reward, namely, "what" reward is to be expected and "when" it will occur. This was examined by investigating the effects of selective reward devaluation upon responding in an instrumental peak timing task in Experiment 1 and by exploring the effects of pre-training lesions targeting the basolateral amygdala (BLA) upon the selective reward devaluation effect and interval timing in a Pavlovian peak timing task in Experiment 2. In both tasks, two stimuli, each 60 s long, signaled that qualitatively distinct rewards (different flavored food pellets) could occur after 20 s. Responding on non-rewarded probe trials displayed the characteristic peak timing function with mean responding gradually increasing and peaking at approximately 20 s before more gradually declining thereafter. One of the rewards was then independently paired repeatedly with LiCl injections in order to devalue it whereas the other reward was unpaired with these injections. In a final set of test sessions in which both stimuli were presented without rewards, it was observed that responding was selectively reduced in the presence of the stimulus signaling the devalued reward compared to the stimulus signaling the still valued reward. Moreover, the timing function was mostly unaltered by this devaluation manipulation. Experiment 2 showed that pre-training BLA lesions abolished this selective reward devaluation effect, but it had no impact on peak timing functions shown by the two stimuli. It appears from these data that learning about "what" and "when" features of reward may entail separate underlying neural systems.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amygdala; Interval timing; Peak procedure; Reward devaluation; Reward processing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29477609      PMCID: PMC6087496          DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  27 in total

1.  Lesions of the basolateral amygdala disrupt selective aspects of reinforcer representation in rats.

Authors:  P Blundell; G Hall; S Killcross
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Interval timing and the encoding of signal duration by ensembles of cortical and striatal neurons.

Authors:  Matthew S Matell; Warren H Meck; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Inactivation of dorsolateral striatum enhances sensitivity to changes in the action-outcome contingency in instrumental conditioning.

Authors:  Henry H Yin; Barbara J Knowlton; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Temporal control of conditioned responding in goldfish.

Authors:  Michael R Drew; Bojana Zupan; Anna Cooke; P A Couvillon; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-01

Review 5.  Oscillatory multiplexing of neural population codes for interval timing and working memory.

Authors:  Bon-Mi Gu; Hedderik van Rijn; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Isolation of an internal clock.

Authors:  S Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1981-07

7.  Neurotoxic lesions of basolateral, but not central, amygdala interfere with Pavlovian second-order conditioning and reinforcer devaluation effects.

Authors:  T Hatfield; J S Han; M Conley; M Gallagher; P Holland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Detection of a temporal error triggers reconsolidation of amygdala-dependent memories.

Authors:  Lorenzo Díaz-Mataix; Raquel Chacon Ruiz Martinez; Glenn E Schafe; Joseph E LeDoux; Valérie Doyère
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Temporal maps and informativeness in associative learning.

Authors:  Peter D Balsam; C Randy Gallistel
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 10.  Time to rethink the neural mechanisms of learning and memory.

Authors:  Charles R Gallistel; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.877

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sign-tracking is an expectancy-mediated behavior that relies on prediction error mechanisms.

Authors:  Rifka C Derman; Kevin Schneider; Shaina Juarez; Andrew R Delamater
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Delay of reinforcement versus rate of reinforcement in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Joseph M Austen; David J Sanderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.478

3.  Striatal dopamine D1 receptors control motivation to respond, but not interval timing, during the timing task.

Authors:  Taisuke Kamada; Toshimichi Hata
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.460

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.