BACKGROUND: Item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) evaluates passive thoughts of death or self-injury within the last two weeks, and is often used to screen depressed patients for suicide risk. We aimed to validate the PHQ-9 item 9 with a brief electronic version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (eC-SSRS). METHODS: We analyzed data from 841 patients enrolled in the National Network of Depression Centers Clinical Care Registry. We performed a validation analysis of PHQ-9 item 9 for suicide risk and ideation, using the eC-SSRS as a gold standard (defined as positive response to suicidal ideation with intent to act or recent suicidal behavior). RESULTS: Of the 841 patients, 13.4% and 41.1% were assessed as being positive for suicide risk by the eC-SSRS and PHQ-9 item 9, respectively. For the overall cohort, sensitivity was 87.6% (95%CI 80.2-92.5%), specificity was 66.1% (95%CI 62.6-69.4%), PPV was 28.6% (95%CI 24.1-33.6%), and NPV was 97.2% (95%CI 95.3-98.3%) for the PHQ-9 suicide item. These performance measures varied within subgroups defined by demographic and clinical characteristics. In addition, the validity of PHQ-9 item 9 (cutoff score of 1) with eC-SSRS-defined suicide ideation showed overall poor results. LIMITATIONS: The gold standard used in our study was a surrogate measure of suicidality based on eC-SSRS scores. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that item 9 of the PHQ-9 is an insufficient assessment tool for suicide risk and suicide ideation, with limited utility in certain demographic and clinical subgroups that requires further investigation.
BACKGROUND: Item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) evaluates passive thoughts of death or self-injury within the last two weeks, and is often used to screen depressedpatients for suicide risk. We aimed to validate the PHQ-9 item 9 with a brief electronic version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (eC-SSRS). METHODS: We analyzed data from 841 patients enrolled in the National Network of Depression Centers Clinical Care Registry. We performed a validation analysis of PHQ-9 item 9 for suicide risk and ideation, using the eC-SSRS as a gold standard (defined as positive response to suicidal ideation with intent to act or recent suicidal behavior). RESULTS: Of the 841 patients, 13.4% and 41.1% were assessed as being positive for suicide risk by the eC-SSRS and PHQ-9 item 9, respectively. For the overall cohort, sensitivity was 87.6% (95%CI 80.2-92.5%), specificity was 66.1% (95%CI 62.6-69.4%), PPV was 28.6% (95%CI 24.1-33.6%), and NPV was 97.2% (95%CI 95.3-98.3%) for the PHQ-9 suicide item. These performance measures varied within subgroups defined by demographic and clinical characteristics. In addition, the validity of PHQ-9 item 9 (cutoff score of 1) with eC-SSRS-defined suicide ideation showed overall poor results. LIMITATIONS: The gold standard used in our study was a surrogate measure of suicidality based on eC-SSRS scores. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that item 9 of the PHQ-9 is an insufficient assessment tool for suicide risk and suicide ideation, with limited utility in certain demographic and clinical subgroups that requires further investigation.
Authors: Charles H Bombardier; Casey B Azuero; Jesse R Fann; Donald D Kautz; J Scott Richards; Sunil Sabharwal Journal: Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil Date: 2021
Authors: Anne Claire Grammer; Jillian Shah; Agatha A Laboe; Claire G McGinnis; Katherine N Balantekin; Andrea K Graham; Lauren Smolar; C Barr Taylor; Denise E Wilfley; Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 5.791
Authors: Carl Y Zhang; Jennifer L Vande Voort; Deniz Yuruk; Jeffrey A Mills; Graham J Emslie; Betsy D Kennard; Taryn Mayes; Madhukar Trivedi; William V Bobo; Jeffrey R Strawn; Arjun P Athreya; Paul E Croarkin Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 3.031
Authors: Brian Mustanski; Sarah W Whitton; Michael E Newcomb; Antonia Clifford; Daniel T Ryan; Robert D Gibbons Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2021-03
Authors: Margaret Ngai; Kathleen Delaney; Barbara Limandri; Kristin Dreves; Mary V Tipton; Lisa M Horowitz Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs Date: 2021-06-10