| Literature DB >> 29476701 |
Yang Zeng1, Alan Hiti2, Sherry Moranville2, Gloria Vicent2, Sylvia Chavira2, Monika de Arruda Indig3, Sharon Graminske3, Amanda Boerner3, Anna Schmidt3, Farzad Oreizy1, Angela Chen1, Maryam Saleminik1, Fred Mosqueda1, Anna Lin1, Kevin Judge1.
Abstract
The BD FACSVia™ system is a novel flow cytometer with improved workflow efficiencies. To evaluate the HLA-B27 application developed on the BD FACSVia system utilizing the BD™ HLA-B27 kit, we conducted a concordance study at three centers to compare with the BD FACSCalibur™ system. Prepared donor samples (n = 594) were analyzed on both the BD FACSVia and BD FACSCalibur for the HLA-B27 assay. Adjudication of HLA-B27 discordant results was performed using the reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide (rSSO) DNA typing method (LABType® SSO, One Lambda). On the BD FACSVia system 80 B27 positive, 499 B27 negative and 15 "Inconclusive" samples were observed. The corresponding BD FACSCalibur results were 73 B27 positive, 502 B27 negative and 19 "gray zone" samples. The overall concordance of HLA-B27 determination was 98% between the two systems with seven more positives identified on BD FACSVia as compared to BD FACSCalibur. The equivocal zone between positive and negative on BD FACSVia (named "Inconclusive") and on BD FACSCalibur (named "gray zone") is due to antibody cross reactivity of HLA-B27 clone GS145.2. One negative sample verified with the rSSO DNA method was reported as HLA-B27 positive by the BD FACSVia system leading to a false positive result. Our study demonstrated concordance results between the BD FACSVia system and BD FACSCalibur. Intersite reproducibility of BD HLA-B27 assay remained within the limits of acceptability.Entities:
Keywords: HLA-B27 typing; concordance study; flow cytometry; interlaboratory reproducibility
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29476701 PMCID: PMC6174995 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21630
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cytometry B Clin Cytom ISSN: 1552-4949 Impact factor: 3.058
Figure 1Gating strategy used by the software algorithm of BD HLA‐B27 assay on the BD FACSVia and BD FACSCalibur systems. On the BD FACSVia, initial gating of CD3+ T‐cells was placed in the CD3 PE (FL2) vs.SSC plot. On the BD FACSCalibur, initial gating of CD3+ T‐cells was placed in the FL2 (CD3) vs.FSC plot. LMF of HLA‐B27 FITC was obtained from the interval gate placed on all CD3+ T‐cells in the HLA‐B27 FITC (FL1) histogram. LMF was further compared to the predetermined decision marker using BD HLA‐B27 software algorithm to generate HLA‐B27 outcome. (A) Panel: HLA‐B27 positive sample (B) Panel: HLA‐B27 negative sample (C) Panel: Gray zone (Inconclusive) sample. In each panel, the same donor sample was analyzed using the same lot of BD HLA‐B27 kit on both the BD FACSCalibur and BD FACSVia systems. The decision marker of each reagent lot was set by the suffix on the reagent vial for HLA‐B27 FITC/CD3 PE.
Definition and Results of Concordance Study
| Comparative method (BD HLA‐B27 kit on BD FACSCalibur) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Gray zone | Negative | BD FACSVia row total | ||
| Test method (BD HLA‐B27 kit on BD FACSVia) | Positive |
|
|
|
|
| Inconclusive |
|
|
|
| |
| Negative |
|
|
|
| |
| BD FACSCalibur column total |
|
|
|
| |
Note: (a) Overall concordance was calculated as 100*{(a + e + i)/n} = 100*582/594 = 98%. (b) The five hundred and ninety four (594) samples were from 594 donors.
Results of HLA‐B27 Using rSSO DNA Typing Method
| Discordant sample | BD FACSCalibur | BD FACSVia | Molecular test results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gray Zone | Positive | Negative |
| 2 | Gray Zone | Positive | Positive |
| 3 | Gray Zone | Positive | Positive |
| 4 | Gray Zone | Positive | Positive |
| 5 | Gray Zone | Positive | Positive |
| 6 | Gray Zone | Positive | Positive |
| 7 | Gray Zone | Positive | Positive |
| 8 | Gray Zone | Positive | Positive |
| 9 | Negative | Inconclusive | Negative |
| 10 | Negative | Inconclusive | Negative |
| 11 | Negative | Inconclusive | Negative |
| 12 | Positive | Inconclusive | Positive |
Summary Statistics for the Interlaboratory Reproducibility of BD FACSVia System
| LMF statistics of HLA‐B27 FITC per study site | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donor type |
Study | N | Mean | SD | CV% | Minimum | Median | Maximum |
|
HLA‐B27 | BCW | 30 | 137.13 | 1.87 | 1.36 | 134.00 | 137.00 | 141.00 |
| MED | 30 | 136.13 | 1.36 | 1.00 | 134.00 | 136.00 | 138.00 | |
| USC | 30 | 134.40 | 1.73 | 1.29 | 130.00 | 134.00 | 138.00 | |
| HLA‐B27 positive | BCW | 30 | 173.00 | 1.62 | 0.94 | 170.00 | 173.00 | 176.00 |
| MED | 30 | 173.73 | 1.51 | 0.87 | 172.00 | 173.00 | 177.00 | |
| USC | 30 | 172.23 | 2.36 | 1.37 | 167.00 | 173.00 | 178.00 | |
Note: (a) BCW (BloodCenter of Wisconsin), USC (University of Southern California), MED (MedLab of BD Life Sciences). (b) CV% was calculated as SD/mean*100.
Precision Evaluation of the BD FACSVia System
| Donor type | Source of variation | Total LMF mean | SD with upper 95% CL |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLA‐B27 negative | Within‐run repeatability | 135.9 | 0.9 (1.0) |
| Total interlaboratory reproducibility | 135.9 | 2.1 (2.4) | |
| HLA‐B27 positive | Within‐run repeatability | 173.0 | 0.9 (1.0) |
| Total interlaboratory reproducibility | 173.0 | 2.0 (2.3) |
Note: (a) Combined data from three sites were used in the calculation of total LMF mean with SD (95% CL). (b) Total interlaboratory reproducibility included variables of within‐run, day and site/operator/instrument.