Mohsen Beheshti1,2, Zeinab Paymani3,4, Joana Brilhante5, Hans Geinitz6, Daniela Gehring3, Thomas Leopoldseder3, Ludovic Wouters5, Christian Pirich7, Wolfgang Loidl8, Werner Langsteger3. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine & Endocrinology, PET-CT Center LINZ, Ordensklinikum, St. Vincent's Hospital, Seilerstaette 4, A-4020, Linz, Austria. mohsen.beheshti@ordensklinikum.at. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine & Endocrinology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. mohsen.beheshti@ordensklinikum.at. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine & Endocrinology, PET-CT Center LINZ, Ordensklinikum, St. Vincent's Hospital, Seilerstaette 4, A-4020, Linz, Austria. 4. Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum, St. Vincent's Hospital, Linz, Austria. 6. ANMI SA, Liege, Belgium. 7. Department of Nuclear Medicine & Endocrinology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. 8. Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center, Ordensklinikum, St. Vincent's Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In this prospective study, we evaluated the optimal time-point for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT acquisition in the assessment of prostate cancer. We also examined, for the first time the feasibility of tracer production using a PSMA-11 sterile cold-kit in the clinical workflow of PET/CT centres. METHODS: Fifty prostate cancer patients (25 staging, 25 biochemical recurrence) were enrolled in this study. All patients received an intravenous dose of 2.0 MBq/kg body weight 68Ga-PSMA-11 prepared using a sterile cold kit (ANMI SA, Liege, Belgium), followed by an early (20 min after injection) semi-whole-body PET/CT scan and a standard-delay (100 min after injection) abdominopelvic PET/CT scan. The detection rates with 68Ga-PSMA-11 were compared between the two acquisitions. The pattern of physiological background activity and tumour to background ratio were also analysed. RESULTS: The total preparation time was reduced to 5 min using the PSMA-11 sterile cold kit, which improved the final radionuclide activity by about 30% per single 68Ge/68Ga generator elution. Overall, 158 pathological lesions were analysed in 45 patients (90%) suggestive of malignancy on both (early and standard-delay) 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT images. There was a significant (p < 0.001) increase in SUVmax on delayed images in suspicious prostates (11.6 ± 8.2 to 14.8 ± 1.0) and lymph nodes (LNs; 9.7 ± 5.9 to 12.3 ± 8.8), while bone lesions showed no significant increase (8.5 ± 5.6 to 9.2 ± 7.0, p = 0.188). However, the SUVmax of suspicious lesions on early images was adequate to support the criteria for correct interpretation (mean SUVmax 9.83 ± 6.7).In 26 of 157 lesions, but a decrease in SUV was seen, mostly in subcentimetre lesions in patients with multiple metastases. However, it did not affect the staging of the disease or patient management. The tumour to background ratio of primary prostate lesions and LNs showed a significant (p < 0.001) increase from the early to the standard-delay acquisition, but no significant increase was seen in bony lesions (p = 0.11). CONCLUSION: The PSMA-11 sterile cold kit seems to be feasible for use in routine clinical practice, and it has a shorter radionuclide preparation time and is less operator-dependent than the synthesizer-based production method. In addition, early 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging seems to provide a detection rate comparable with that of standard-delay imaging. Furthermore, the shorter preparation time using the 68Ga-PSMA-11 sterile cold kit and promising value of early PET/CT scanning could allow tailoring of imaging protocols which may reduce the costs and improve the time efficiency in PET/CT centres.
PURPOSE: In this prospective study, we evaluated the optimal time-point for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT acquisition in the assessment of prostate cancer. We also examined, for the first time the feasibility of tracer production using a PSMA-11 sterile cold-kit in the clinical workflow of PET/CT centres. METHODS: Fifty prostate cancerpatients (25 staging, 25 biochemical recurrence) were enrolled in this study. All patients received an intravenous dose of 2.0 MBq/kg body weight 68Ga-PSMA-11 prepared using a sterile cold kit (ANMI SA, Liege, Belgium), followed by an early (20 min after injection) semi-whole-body PET/CT scan and a standard-delay (100 min after injection) abdominopelvic PET/CT scan. The detection rates with 68Ga-PSMA-11 were compared between the two acquisitions. The pattern of physiological background activity and tumour to background ratio were also analysed. RESULTS: The total preparation time was reduced to 5 min using the PSMA-11 sterile cold kit, which improved the final radionuclide activity by about 30% per single 68Ge/68Ga generator elution. Overall, 158 pathological lesions were analysed in 45 patients (90%) suggestive of malignancy on both (early and standard-delay) 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT images. There was a significant (p < 0.001) increase in SUVmax on delayed images in suspicious prostates (11.6 ± 8.2 to 14.8 ± 1.0) and lymph nodes (LNs; 9.7 ± 5.9 to 12.3 ± 8.8), while bone lesions showed no significant increase (8.5 ± 5.6 to 9.2 ± 7.0, p = 0.188). However, the SUVmax of suspicious lesions on early images was adequate to support the criteria for correct interpretation (mean SUVmax 9.83 ± 6.7).In 26 of 157 lesions, but a decrease in SUV was seen, mostly in subcentimetre lesions in patients with multiple metastases. However, it did not affect the staging of the disease or patient management. The tumour to background ratio of primary prostate lesions and LNs showed a significant (p < 0.001) increase from the early to the standard-delay acquisition, but no significant increase was seen in bony lesions (p = 0.11). CONCLUSION: The PSMA-11 sterile cold kit seems to be feasible for use in routine clinical practice, and it has a shorter radionuclide preparation time and is less operator-dependent than the synthesizer-based production method. In addition, early 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging seems to provide a detection rate comparable with that of standard-delay imaging. Furthermore, the shorter preparation time using the 68Ga-PSMA-11 sterile cold kit and promising value of early PET/CT scanning could allow tailoring of imaging protocols which may reduce the costs and improve the time efficiency in PET/CT centres.
Authors: Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Lars Peter Sattler; Walter Mier; Boris A Hadaschik; Jürgen Debus; Tim Holland-Letz; Klaus Kopka; Uwe Haberkorn Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christian Uprimny; Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Clemens Decristoforo; Josef Fritz; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Dorota Kendler; Lorenza Scarpa; Gianpaolo di Santo; Llanos Geraldo Roig; Johanna Maffey-Steffan; Wolfgang Horninger; Irene Johanna Virgolini Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sebastian Schmuck; Martin Mamach; Florian Wilke; Christoph A von Klot; Christoph Henkenberens; James T Thackeray; Jan M Sohns; Lilli Geworski; Tobias L Ross; Hans-Juergen Wester; Hans Christiansen; Frank M Bengel; Thorsten Derlin Journal: Clin Nucl Med Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 7.794
Authors: S P Rowe; M A Gorin; M E Allaf; K J Pienta; P T Tran; M G Pomper; A E Ross; S Y Cho Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Henrik Hetzheim; Wolfgang Kübler; Clemens Kratochwil; Frederik L Giesel; Thomas A Hope; Matthias Eder; Michael Eisenhut; Klaus Kopka; Uwe Haberkorn Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Mohsen Beheshti; Reza Vali; Peter Waldenberger; Friedrich Fitz; Michael Nader; Wolfgang Loidl; Gabriele Broinger; Franz Stoiber; Ignac Foglman; Werner Langsteger Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Martina Weineisen; Jakub Simecek; Margret Schottelius; Markus Schwaiger; Hans-Jürgen Wester Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Florian Sterzing; Clemens Kratochwil; Hannah Fiedler; Sonja Katayama; Gregor Habl; Klaus Kopka; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Jürgen Debus; Uwe Haberkorn; Frederik L Giesel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sarah Piron; Jeroen Verhoeven; Benedicte Descamps; Ken Kersemans; Kathia De Man; Nick Van Laeken; Leen Pieters; Anne Vral; Christian Vanhove; Filip De Vos Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 4.379