Ali Afshar-Oromieh1,2, Lars Peter Sattler3, Walter Mier3, Boris A Hadaschik4, Jürgen Debus5, Tim Holland-Letz6, Klaus Kopka7, Uwe Haberkorn3,2. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany a.afshar@gmx.de. 2. Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. 4. Department of Urology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. 6. Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; and. 7. Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
Although PET/CT with 68Ga-PSMA-11 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is routinely performed at 1 h after injection, later scans may be beneficial because most lesions present with higher uptake and contrast. This evaluation aimed to investigate the clinical impact of additional late 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Methods:Between 2011 and 2016, 112 patients with PCa who underwent early (at 1 h after injection) and late (at 3 h after injection) 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans were retrospectively evaluated. The late scans were conducted to clarify unclear findings in early scans or to increase the probability of tumor detection in the case of negative early scans. All patients were asked to drink 1 L of water between early and late scans. In addition, 20 patients received 20 mg of furosemide before late scans. Tumor detection and radioactivity concentration within the urinary bladder were analyzed in both scans. The SUVmax and contrast of 149 tumor lesions were measured in 69 patients with pathologic findings. Results: Overall, 134 lesions characteristic for PCa in 57 patients clearly presented at 1 h after injection and 147 lesions in 68 patients at 3 h after injection. Forty-three patients showed no pathologic findings. Eight patients (7.1%) showed 1 unclear finding in early scans, which could be clarified as characteristic for PCa at 3 h after injection. Four patients (3.6%) presented with 1 lesion characteristic for PCa at 3 h after injection only. Twelve patients (10.7%) presented with 12 possible PCa lesions at 1 h after injection, which, however, could not be confirmed as PCa in late scans. Two patients presented with 1 lesion characteristic for PCa at 1 h after injection, which became invisible at 3 h after injection because of low contrast. At 3 h after injection, 62.4% of the lesions demonstrated a higher SUVmax and 65.1% a higher contrast than at 1 h after injection. Patients with furosemide presented with lower SUV and radioactivity concentration within the urinary bladder. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at 3 h after injection showed most lesions characteristic for PCa with a higher uptake and contrast. In addition, the radioactivity signal within the urinary bladder was lower at 3 h after injection, especially when furosemide was applied. Consequently, scans at 3 h after injection detected more tumor lesions than at 1 h after injection.
RCT Entities:
Although PET/CT with 68Ga-PSMA-11 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is routinely performed at 1 h after injection, later scans may be beneficial because most lesions present with higher uptake and contrast. This evaluation aimed to investigate the clinical impact of additional late 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Methods: Between 2011 and 2016, 112 patients with PCa who underwent early (at 1 h after injection) and late (at 3 h after injection) 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans were retrospectively evaluated. The late scans were conducted to clarify unclear findings in early scans or to increase the probability of tumor detection in the case of negative early scans. All patients were asked to drink 1 L of water between early and late scans. In addition, 20 patients received 20 mg of furosemide before late scans. Tumor detection and radioactivity concentration within the urinary bladder were analyzed in both scans. The SUVmax and contrast of 149 tumor lesions were measured in 69 patients with pathologic findings. Results: Overall, 134 lesions characteristic for PCa in 57 patients clearly presented at 1 h after injection and 147 lesions in 68 patients at 3 h after injection. Forty-three patients showed no pathologic findings. Eight patients (7.1%) showed 1 unclear finding in early scans, which could be clarified as characteristic for PCa at 3 h after injection. Four patients (3.6%) presented with 1 lesion characteristic for PCa at 3 h after injection only. Twelve patients (10.7%) presented with 12 possible PCa lesions at 1 h after injection, which, however, could not be confirmed as PCa in late scans. Two patients presented with 1 lesion characteristic for PCa at 1 h after injection, which became invisible at 3 h after injection because of low contrast. At 3 h after injection, 62.4% of the lesions demonstrated a higher SUVmax and 65.1% a higher contrast than at 1 h after injection. Patients with furosemide presented with lower SUV and radioactivity concentration within the urinary bladder. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at 3 h after injection showed most lesions characteristic for PCa with a higher uptake and contrast. In addition, the radioactivity signal within the urinary bladder was lower at 3 h after injection, especially when furosemide was applied. Consequently, scans at 3 h after injection detected more tumor lesions than at 1 h after injection.
Authors: Thomas A Hope; Jeremy Z Goodman; Isabel E Allen; Jeremie Calais; Wolfgang P Fendler; Peter R Carroll Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christos Sachpekidis; Leyun Pan; Boris A Hadaschik; Klaus Kopka; Uwe Haberkorn; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-10-20
Authors: Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Maya Wolf; Uwe Haberkorn; Marc Kachelrieß; Regula Gnirs; Klaus Kopka; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Martin T Freitag Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Kambiz Rahbar; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Martin Bögemann; Stefan Wagner; Michael Schäfers; Lars Stegger; Matthias Weckesser Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann; Chukwuka Eze; Minglun Li; Paul Rogowski; Christian Schaefer; Christian Stief; Alexander Buchner; Constantinos Zamboglou; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Ute Ganswindt; Clemens Cyran; Peter Bartenstein; Claus Belka; Harun Ilhan Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christian Uprimny; Steffen Bayerschmidt; Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Josef Fritz; Bernhard Nilica; Anna Svirydenka; Clemens Decristoforo; Gianpaolo di Santo; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Wolfgang Horninger; Irene Johanna Virgolini Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Lars Peter Sattler; Katja Steiger; Tim Holland-Letz; Marcelo Livorsi da Cunha; Walter Mier; Oliver Neels; Klaus Kopka; Wilko Weichert; Uwe Haberkorn Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Christian Uprimny; Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Josef Fritz; Clemens Decristoforo; Dorota Kendler; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Bernhard Nilica; Johanna Maffey-Steffan; Gianpaolo di Santo; Jasmin Bektic; Wolfgang Horninger; Irene Johanna Virgolini Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sara Sheikhbahaei; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Matthias Eiber; Lilja B Solnes; Mehrbod S Javadi; Ashley E Ross; Kenneth J Pienta; Mohamad E Allaf; Uwe Haberkorn; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin; Steven P Rowe Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Thorsten Derlin; Sebastian Schmuck; Cathleen Juhl; Steffi Teichert; Johanna Zörgiebel; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Sophie M Schneefeld; Almut C A Walte; James T Thackeray; Tobias L Ross; Frank M Bengel Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.488