Literature DB >> 29475979

Ethical decision-making climate in the ICU: theoretical framework and validation of a self-assessment tool.

Bo Van den Bulcke1, Ruth Piers2, Hanne Irene Jensen3,4, Johan Malmgren5, Victoria Metaxa6, Anna K Reyners7, Michael Darmon8, Katerina Rusinova9, Daniel Talmor10, Anne-Pascale Meert11, Laura Cancelliere12, Làszló Zubek13, Paolo Maia14, Andrej Michalsen15, Johan Decruyenaere1, Erwin J O Kompanje16, Elie Azoulay17, Reitske Meganck18, Ariëlla Van de Sompel19, Stijn Vansteelandt19, Peter Vlerick20, Stijn Vanheule21, Dominique D Benoit1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Literature depicts differences in ethical decision-making (EDM) between countries and intensive care units (ICU).
OBJECTIVES: To better conceptualise EDM climate in the ICU and to validate a tool to assess EDM climates.
METHODS: Using a modified Delphi method, we built a theoretical framework and a self-assessment instrument consisting of 35 statements. This Ethical Decision-Making Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ) was developed to capture three EDM domains in healthcare: interdisciplinary collaboration and communication; leadership by physicians; and ethical environment. This instrument was subsequently validated among clinicians working in 68 adult ICUs in 13 European countries and the USA. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine the structure of the EDM climate as perceived by clinicians. Measurement invariance was tested to make sure that variables used in the analysis were comparable constructs across different groups.
RESULTS: Of 3610 nurses and 1137 physicians providing ICU bedside care, 2275 (63.1%) and 717 (62.9%) participated respectively. Statistical analyses revealed that a shortened 32-item version of the EDMCQ scale provides a factorial valid measurement of seven facets of the extent to which clinicians perceive an EDM climate: self-reflective and empowering leadership by physicians; practice and culture of open interdisciplinary reflection; culture of not avoiding end-of-life decisions; culture of mutual respect within the interdisciplinary team; active involvement of nurses in end-of-life care and decision-making; active decision-making by physicians; and practice and culture of ethical awareness. Measurement invariance of the EDMCQ across occupational groups was shown, reflecting that nurses and physicians interpret the EDMCQ items in a similar manner.
CONCLUSIONS: The 32-item version of the EDMCQ might enrich the EDM climate measurement, clinicians' behaviour and the performance of healthcare organisations. This instrument offers opportunities to develop tailored ICU team interventions. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; critical care; decision-making; teamwork

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29475979     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  16 in total

1.  Building communities of respect in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Samuel M Brown; Daniel Talmor; Michael D Howell
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  [Non-beneficial therapy and emotional exhaustion in end-of-life care : Results of a survey among intensive care unit personnel].

Authors:  Christiane S Hartog; F Hoffmann; A Mikolajetz; S Schröder; A Michalsen; K Dey; R Riessen; U Jaschinski; M Weiss; M Ragaller; S Bercker; J Briegel; C Spies; D Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  White paper: statement on conflicts of interest.

Authors:  Julian Bion; Massimo Antonelli; LLuis Blanch; J Randall Curtis; Christiane Druml; Bin Du; Flavia R Machado; Charles Gomersall; Christiane Hartog; Mitchell Levy; John Myburgh; Gordon Rubenfeld; Charles Sprung
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Understanding ethical climate, moral distress, and burnout: a novel tool and a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dzeng; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  The prevalence of perceptions of mismatch between treatment intensity and achievable goals of care in the intensive care unit: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Matthew H Anstey; Edward Litton; Michelle L Trevenen; Kelly Thompson; Steve Webb; Ian Seppelt; Imogen A Mitchell
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Improving the intensive care experience from the perspectives of different stakeholders.

Authors:  Jos M Latour; Nancy Kentish-Barnes; Theresa Jacques; Marc Wysocki; Elie Azoulay; Victoria Metaxa
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 19.334

Review 7.  Competing and conflicting interests in the care of critically ill patients.

Authors:  Alison E Turnbull; Sarina K Sahetya; E Lee Daugherty Biddison; Christiane S Hartog; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Dominique D Benoit; Bertrand Guidet; Rik T Gerritsen; Mark R Tonelli; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Outcome in patients perceived as receiving excessive care across different ethical climates: a prospective study in 68 intensive care units in Europe and the USA.

Authors:  D D Benoit; H I Jensen; J Malmgren; V Metaxa; A K Reyners; M Darmon; K Rusinova; D Talmor; A P Meert; L Cancelliere; L Zubek; P Maia; A Michalsen; S Vanheule; E J O Kompanje; J Decruyenaere; S Vandenberghe; S Vansteelandt; B Gadeyne; B Van den Bulcke; E Azoulay; R D Piers
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Caring for the critically ill patients over 80: a narrative review.

Authors:  Bertrand Guidet; Helene Vallet; Jacques Boddaert; Dylan W de Lange; Alessandro Morandi; Guillaume Leblanc; Antonio Artigas; Hans Flaatten
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 6.925

10.  Assessing ethical climates in critical care and their impact on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Emmanuel Okenyi; Thomas Michael Donaldson; Andrea Collins; Ben Morton; Angela Obasi
Journal:  Breathe (Sheff)       Date:  2019-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.