| Literature DB >> 29475204 |
Jesús Escrivá Muñoz, Pedro Gambús, Erik W Jensen, Montserrat Vallverdú.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This works investigates the time-frequency content of impedance cardiography signals during a propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29475204 PMCID: PMC6178203 DOI: 10.3414/ME17-01-0071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Methods Inf Med ISSN: 0026-1270 Impact factor: 2.176
1 Patients’ data and medications during surgical procedures. Qualitative data are presented as absolute frequencies and percentages; quantitative data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 51.0 ± 16.0 years | Propofol | 131 (100%) |
| Height | 162.1 ± 8.1 cm | Remifentanil | 131 (100%) |
| Weight | 68.2 ± 12.8 kg | Rocuronium | 46 (35.1%) |
| LBM, Lean Body Mass | 47.7 ± 7.7 | Ephedrine | 4 (3.1%) |
| BSA, Body Surface Area | 1.73 ± 0.21 m 2 | Atropine | 21 (16.0%) |
| BMI, Body Mass Index | 26.0 ± 4.7 kg/m 2 | ||
| Gender (male/female) | 32/99 (24.4%/75.6%) | ||
Kernels for the QTFDs [ 25 ] and their parameter values used for the ICG characterization. The parameters a, α, β and σ and the window length W define the kernel shape.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CWD |
e
−v
2
τ
2
/
|
|
| MBD |
|
|
| EMBD |
|
|
|
| ||
| Spectrogram |
|
Hanning,
|
| ZAM |
|
|
Time-frequency extension of time-domain features.
| Feature | TF Formulation | |
|---|---|---|
| TFD Mean |
| (7) |
| TFD Variance |
| (8) |
| TFD Skewness |
| (9) |
| TFD Kurtosis |
| (10) |
| TFD Coefficient of variation |
| (11) |
Selected features to distinguish between pre-LOC and post-LOC ICG segments. All features have arbitrary units.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| SVD-based TFD-derived Features | Maximum SV |
|
| SV Standard Deviation |
| |
| SV Range |
| |
| Entropy-based TFD-derived Features | TF Complexity |
|
| TF Renyi Entropy |
| |
| TF Normalized Renyi Entropy |
| |
| Extended Time-Domain TFD-derived Features | Mean |
|
| Variance |
| |
| Kurtosis |
| |
| Skewness |
| |
| Coefficient of variation |
| |
| Energy Concentration | Energy Concentration |
|
| Sub-Bands Energy-based Features |
Energy in
|
|
Fig. 1EMBD of an ICG segment before LOC (A) and after LOC (B).
Mean and standard deviation of the SVD-based TFD parameters. All changes between pre-LOC and post-LOC are statistically significant. * indicates that Sen ˃ 60 %, Spe ˃ 60 % and AUC ˃ 60 %.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| CWD | (4.0 ± 3.0)·10 4 | (2.4 ± 1.6)·10 4 | (9.8 ± 7.1)·10 2 | (5.6 ± 3.7)·10 2 | (8.1 ± 1.4)·101 | (7.4 ± 1.3)·10 1 |
| MBD | (1.5 ± 1.1)·10 5 | (9.2 ± 6.4)·10 4 | (3.6 ± 2.6)·10 3 | (2.0 ± 1.4)·10 3 | (1.3 ± 0.1)·10 2 | (1.2 ± 0.2)·10 2 |
| EMBD | (1.4 ± 1.1)·10 7 | (8.4 ± 5.8)·10 6 | (3.2 ± 2.3)·10 5 | (1.8 ± 1.2)·10 5 | (2.4 ± 0.6)·10 2 * | (2.1 ± 0.5)·10 2 |
| Spec. (Han.) | (1.5 ± 1.1)·10 7 | (8.3 ± 5.6)·10 6 | (3.1 ± 2.3)·10 5 | (1.7 ± 1.1)·10 5 | (1.0 ± 0.1)·10 2 | (9.7 ± 1.2)·10 1 |
| ZAM | (6.3 ± 4.7)·10 6 | (3.8 ± 2.7)·10 6 | (1.6 ± 1.2)·10 5 | (9.1 ± 6.0)·10 4 | (5.4 ± 1.9)·10 2 | (4.6 ± 1.4)·10 2 |
Fig. 3Pre (blue) and post-LOC (red) median values for TFRE (A) and TFNRE (B) for the EMBD. Changes between pre and post LOC values are always statistically significant (p<0.05).
Mean [95% CI] of area under the curve (AUC) of the receiving operating curve (ROC), sensitivity ( Sen ) and specificity ( Spe ) of the TRFE feature for all the studied distributions and all q values. TRFE values for before and after the LOC have also been included. CI of AUC are the same as the mean and thus are not included.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWD | 61.52 [61.35,61.69] | 68.90 [68.64,69.16] | 0.69 | −9.26 ± 1.18 | −8.51 ± 1.13 |
| MBD | 61.07 [60.86,61.27] | 67.17 [66.66,67.69] | 0.69 | −11.38 ± 1.25 | −10.59 ± 1.21 |
| EMBD | 63.01 [62.91,63.11] | 69.33 [69.04,69.62] | 0.71 | −17.64 ± 1.24 | −16.77 ± 1.20 |
| Spec. (Han) | 62.29 [61.90,62.67] | 69.92 [69.69,70.14] | 0.72 | −17.15 ± 1.23 | −16.22 ± 1.13 |
| ZAM | 62.44 [62.16,62.73] | 69.41 [68.92,69.90] | 0.70 | −16.73 ± 1.22 | −15.91 ± 1.15 |
Time-extended TF features of the ICG signals before and after the LOC using the spectrogram kernel with a Hanning window. All changes are statistically significant. Features have arbitrary units.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
| 486.5 ± 340.5 | 275.0 ±168.4 |
|
| (3.6 ± 5.3)10 7 | (1.0± 1.5)10 7 |
|
| 16.1 ±2.8 | 15.0 ±2.4 |
|
| 319.0 ±100.9 | 278.0 ±87.1 |
|
| 9.8 ±1.5 | 9.5 ±1.3 |
Fig. 4Pre and post-LOC ECOME values for the CWD (A), the EMBD (B), the MBD (C), the spectrogram with a Hamming window (D) and the ZAM distribution (E). Changes between pre and post LOC values are always statistically significant (p<0.05).
Fig. 5Mean and standard deviation of the energy of some bands for the pre-LOC (blue) and post-LOC (red) periods. The kernel used for this figure is the MBD. * indicates that the change is statistically significant (p<0.05).