Literature DB >> 29474541

Enamel microcracks in the form of tooth damage during orthodontic debonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

Irma Dumbryte1, Jurate Vebriene2, Laura Linkeviciene3, Mangirdas Malinauskas4.   

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the enamel microcracks (EMCs) characteristics (qualitative and quantitative) in the form of tooth damage before and after debonding from human teeth of in vitro studies. Eligibility criteria: Laboratorial studies evaluating EMCs characteristics before and after debonding metal and ceramic brackets from human teeth with intact buccal enamel. Information sources: An electronic search of four databases (all databases of the Cochrane Library, CA Web of Science, MEDLINE via PubMed, and Google Scholar) and additional manual searches were carried out, without language restrictions. Studies published between 2000 and 2017 years were selected. Reference lists of the included articles were screened, and authors were contacted when necessary. Risk of bias: The following six parameters were analyzed: blinding of examiner and outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data before bonding and after debonding, selective outcome reporting, and incomplete reporting of EMCs assessment. Included studies: Out of 430 potentially eligible studies, 259 were screened by title and abstract, 180 were selected for full-text analysis, 14 were included in the systematic review. Seven studies were selected for the meta-analysis. Synthesis of results: The results for EMCs characteristics were expressed as mean differences (MDs) with their 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs), and calculated from random-effects meta-analyses. Debonding was associated with the increase in number (three studies, MD = 3.50, 95% CI, 2.13 to 4.87, P < 0.00001), length (seven studies, MD = 3.09 mm, 95% CI, 0.75-5.43, P < 0.00001), and width (three studies, MD = 0.39 µm, 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.79, P = 0.06) of EMCs. Considerable statistical heterogeneity was found for two forest plots evaluating the changes of number and length characteristics during debonding. Conclusions: There is weak evidence indicating length and width of EMCs increase following bracket removal and the scientific evidence concerning quantitative evaluation of the number parameter before and after debonding is insufficient. However, there is a strong evidence that after debonding the number of EMCs is likely to increase. Registration: No registration was performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29474541     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjx102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  5 in total

1.  Quality assessment tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: A systematic review.

Authors:  Linh Tran; Dao Ngoc Hien Tam; Abdelrahman Elshafay; Thao Dang; Kenji Hirayama; Nguyen Tien Huy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Effect of two different primers on the shear bond strength of metallic brackets to zirconia ceramic.

Authors:  Alexander Franz; Modesto Raabe; Bledar Lilaj; Rinet Dauti; Andreas Moritz; Dieter Müßig; Barbara Cvikl
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Evaluation of Enamel Topography after Debonding Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets by Different Er,Cr:YSGG and Er:YAG Lasers Settings.

Authors:  Marwan Hoteit; Samir Nammour; Toni Zeinoun
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-09

4.  Effects of Three Novel Bracket Luting Agents Containing Zirconia Primer on Shear Bond Strength of Metal Orthodontic Brackets Attached to Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: A Preliminary In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Milad Shamohammadi Heidari; Mehrnaz Moradinejad; Hamed Tabatabaei; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-02-24

5.  Three-dimensional non-destructive visualization of teeth enamel microcracks using X-ray micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Irma Dumbryte; Arturas Vailionis; Edvinas Skliutas; Saulius Juodkazis; Mangirdas Malinauskas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.