Divya Srikumaran1, Beatriz Munoz1, Anthony J Aldave2, James V Aquavella3, Sadeer B Hannush4, Robert Schultze5, Michael Belin6, Esen Karamursel Akpek7. 1. The Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. The Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California. 3. Flaum Eye Institute, Rochester, New York. 4. Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. Albany Medical Center Department of Ophthalmology, Albany, New York. 6. University of Arizona Department of Ophthalmology, Tucson, Arizona. 7. The Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: esakpek@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the long-term outcomes of Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 158 eyes of 150 patients underwent KPro implantation at 5 participating tertiary centers in the United States between January 2003 and December 2006. Of those, 139 eyes of 133 patients were included in the analyses. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive adult patients who received KPro surgery were reviewed. All patients with at least 1 postoperative visit were retained in the outcomes analyses. In eyes in which a repeat KPro procedure was performed, only the outcomes of the initial surgery were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity (VA) outcomes, postoperative complications, and device retention. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 46.7 ± 26 months with all but 4 eyes having at least 6 months of follow-up. Preoperatively, only 10.8% of the eyes had VA of ≥ 20/200. Postoperatively, the VA in 70% of eyes improved to ≥ 20/200. The probability of maintaining VA of ≥ 20/200 at 7 years was 50%. The device retention rate was estimated at 67% at 7 years. The 7-year cumulative incidence of complications was 49.7% for retroprosthetic membrane formation, 21.6% for glaucoma surgery, 18.6% for retinal detachment, and 15.5% for endophthalmitis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the risk for complications with longer follow-up seemed to increase, this large multicenter cohort demonstrates favorable outcomes with KPro, with a large number of patients achieving and retaining useful vision over a 7-year period.
PURPOSE: To study the long-term outcomes of Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 158 eyes of 150 patients underwent KPro implantation at 5 participating tertiary centers in the United States between January 2003 and December 2006. Of those, 139 eyes of 133 patients were included in the analyses. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive adult patients who received KPro surgery were reviewed. All patients with at least 1 postoperative visit were retained in the outcomes analyses. In eyes in which a repeat KPro procedure was performed, only the outcomes of the initial surgery were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity (VA) outcomes, postoperative complications, and device retention. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 46.7 ± 26 months with all but 4 eyes having at least 6 months of follow-up. Preoperatively, only 10.8% of the eyes had VA of ≥ 20/200. Postoperatively, the VA in 70% of eyes improved to ≥ 20/200. The probability of maintaining VA of ≥ 20/200 at 7 years was 50%. The device retention rate was estimated at 67% at 7 years. The 7-year cumulative incidence of complications was 49.7% for retroprosthetic membrane formation, 21.6% for glaucoma surgery, 18.6% for retinal detachment, and 15.5% for endophthalmitis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the risk for complications with longer follow-up seemed to increase, this large multicenter cohort demonstrates favorable outcomes with KPro, with a large number of patients achieving and retaining useful vision over a 7-year period.
Authors: Alja Crnej; Masahiro Omoto; Thomas H Dohlman; Claes H Dohlman; Reza Dana Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Sina Sharifi; Hannah Sharifi; Ali Akbari; Fengyang Lei; Claes H Dohlman; Miguel Gonzalez-Andrades; Curtis Guild; Eleftherios I Paschalis; James Chodosh Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2021-10-28 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Mohsin H Ali; Mark S Dikopf; Anthony G Finder; Ahmad A Aref; Thasarat Vajaranant; Jose de la Cruz; Maria Soledad Cortina Journal: Cornea Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Sina Sharifi; Hannah Sharifi; Curtis Guild; Mohammad Mirazul Islam; Khoa D Tran; Corrina Patzer; Claes H Dohlman; Eleftherios I Paschalis; Miguel Gonzalez-Andrades; James Chodosh Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Borja Salvador-Culla; Kyung Jae Jeong; Paraskevi Evi Kolovou; Homer H Chiang; James Chodosh; Claes H Dohlman; Daniel S Kohane Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2016-04-28 Impact factor: 3.283