Literature DB >> 29470715

ISSLS PRIZE IN BIOENGINEERING SCIENCE 2018: dynamic imaging of degenerative spondylolisthesis reveals mid-range dynamic lumbar instability not evident on static clinical radiographs.

Malcolm E Dombrowski1, Bryan Rynearson1, Clarissa LeVasseur1, Zach Adgate1, William F Donaldson1, Joon Y Lee1, Ameet Aiyangar1,2, William J Anderst3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) in the setting of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis is commonly treated with spinal fusion in addition to decompression with laminectomy. However, recent studies have shown similar clinical outcomes after decompression alone, suggesting that a subset of DS patients may not require spinal fusion. Identification of dynamic instability could prove useful for predicting which patients are at higher risk of post-laminectomy destabilization necessitating fusion. The goal of this study was to determine if static clinical radiographs adequately characterize dynamic instability in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and to compare the rotational and translational kinematics in vivo during continuous dynamic flexion activity in DS versus asymptomatic age-matched controls.
METHODS: Seven patients with symptomatic single level lumbar DS (6 M, 1 F; 66 ± 5.0 years) and seven age-matched asymptomatic controls (5 M, 2 F age 63.9 ± 6.4 years) underwent biplane radiographic imaging during continuous torso flexion. A volumetric model-based tracking system was used to track each vertebra in the radiographic images using subject-specific 3D bone models from high-resolution computed tomography (CT). In vivo continuous dynamic sagittal rotation (flexion/extension) and AP translation (slip) were calculated and compared to clinical measures of intervertebral flexion/extension and AP translation obtained from standard lateral flexion/extension radiographs.
RESULTS: Static clinical radiographs underestimate the degree of AP translation seen on dynamic in vivo imaging (1.0 vs 3.1 mm; p = 0.03). DS patients demonstrated three primary motion patterns compared to a single kinematic pattern in asymptomatic controls when analyzing continuous dynamic in vivo imaging. 3/7 (42%) of patients with DS demonstrated aberrant mid-range motion.
CONCLUSION: Continuous in vivo dynamic imaging in DS reveals a spectrum of aberrant motion with significantly greater kinematic heterogeneity than previously realized that is not readily seen on current clinical imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V data These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthrokinematics; Degenerative spondylolisthesis; Dynamic imaging; Dynamic instability; In vivo kinematics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29470715      PMCID: PMC6032516          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5489-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  33 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis.

Authors:  K M Kuntz; R K Snider; J N Weinstein; M H Pope; J N Katz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Mechanical properties of the human cervical spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; J J Crisco; A Vasavada; T Oda; J Cholewicki; K Nibu; E Shin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Rationale for the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Gregory D Schroeder; Christopher K Kepler; Mark F Kurd; Alexander R Vaccaro; Wellington K Hsu; Alpesh A Patel; Jason W Savage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis.

Authors:  H N Herkowitz; L T Kurz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: trends in management.

Authors:  Kamran Majid; Jeffrey S Fischgrund
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Importance of correlating static and dynamic imaging studies in diagnosing degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  J A Bendo; B Ong
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2001-03

7.  Inability to prove instability. A critical appraisal of clinical-radiological flexion-extension studies in lumbar disc degeneration.

Authors:  L Penning; J T Wilmink; H H van Woerden
Journal:  Diagn Imaging Clin Med       Date:  1984

8.  Imaging characteristics of "dynamic" versus "static" spondylolisthesis: analysis using magnetic resonance imaging and flexion/extension films.

Authors:  Jesse L Even; Antonia F Chen; Joon Y Lee
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Radiographic evaluation of instability in spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  K B Wood; C A Popp; E E Transfeldt; A E Geissele
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Complications of pedicle screws in lumbar and lumbosacral fusions in 105 consecutive primary operations.

Authors:  P C Jutte; R M Castelein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  8 in total

1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2018.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologies Crucial to Our Understanding of Spinal Conditions?

Authors:  Rebecca J Crawford; Maryse Fortin; Kenneth A Weber; Andrew Smith; James M Elliott
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Percutaneous lumbar annular puncture: A rat model to study intervertebral disc degeneration and pain-related behavior.

Authors:  Richard A Wawrose; Brandon K Couch; Malcom Dombrowski; Stephen R Chen; Anthony Oyekan; Qing Dong; Dong Wang; Chaoming Zhou; Joseph Chen; Karthik Modali; Marit Johnson; Zachary Sedor-Schiffhauer; T Kevin Hitchens; Tao Jin; Kevin M Bell; Joon Y Lee; Gwendolyn A Sowa; Nam V Vo
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2022-05-13

4.  In vivo relationships between lumbar facet joint and intervertebral disc composition and diurnal deformation.

Authors:  Alexander B Oldweiler; John T Martin
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 2.034

5.  Validation of an automated shape-matching algorithm for biplane radiographic spine osteokinematics and radiostereometric analysis error quantification.

Authors:  Craig C Kage; Mohsen Akbari-Shandiz; Mary H Foltz; Rebekah L Lawrence; Taycia L Brandon; Nathaniel E Helwig; Arin M Ellingson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of intra subject repeatability of quantitative fluoroscopy and static radiography in the measurement of lumbar intervertebral flexion translation.

Authors:  Alexander Breen; Emilie Claerbout; Rebecca Hemming; Ravi Ayer; Alan Breen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Within-subject effects of standardized prosthetic socket modifications on physical function and patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  William Anderst; Goeran Fiedler; Kentaro Onishi; Gina McKernan; Tom Gale; Paige Paulus
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  A Dynamic Radiographic Imaging Study of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Morphometry and Deformation In Vivo.

Authors:  Ryan M Byrne; Ameet K Aiyangar; Xudong Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.