Swarup A V Shah1, Minal U Paradkar1, Devendra C Desai2, Tester F Ashavaid3. 1. Research Laboratories, P.D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, V.S. Marg, Mahim, Mumbai, India. 2. Department of Gastroenterology, P.D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, V.S. Marg, Mahim, Mumbai, India. 3. Consultant Biochemist, Head - Department of Laboratory Medicine, Director - Lab Research, Department of Biochemistry, P.D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Veer Savarkar Marg, Mahim, Mumbai 400-016, India, Phone: +91 022 24447935, Fax: +91 022 24442318, E-mail: dr_tashavaid@hindujahospital.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) gene variants have achieved limited success in predicting the outcome of thiopurine therapy, which shows wide inter-individual variations. The literature indicates a strong association between the NUDT15 gene variant and thiopurine-induced toxicity in Asian patients. The present study intends to explore the role of the NUDT15 variant (C415T) in Indian patients on thiopurine therapy. METHODS: NUDT15 and TPMT genotyping were performed using amplification-refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) and the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) technique. RESULTS: Of 370 samples received for TPMT testing, 206 samples were available for NUDT15 genotyping. The NUDT15 risk allele frequency was 10.7%, with the frequency of wild, heterozygous and mutant genotypes being 80.6%, 17.5% and 1.9%, respectively. TPMT variants were seen in 13 of 370 (3.5%) patients, whereas the NUDT15 variant was seen in 40 of 206 (19.4%) patients. Thiopurine-induced toxicity information was available for 101 patients, among whom 10 developed leukopenia and all harbored the NUDT15 variant (p<0.0001). NUDT15 was clinically more relevant than TPMT in terms of sensitivity and specificity, as well as with a statistically significant difference in thiopurine dose requirement for patients with the NUDT15 variant. CONCLUSIONS: A preemptive NUDT15 genotyping approach can therefore help identify high-risk patients (NUDT15 C415T positive) who could benefit from thiopurine dose reduction, thereby preventing fatal thiopurine-induced toxicity.
BACKGROUND:Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) gene variants have achieved limited success in predicting the outcome of thiopurine therapy, which shows wide inter-individual variations. The literature indicates a strong association between the NUDT15 gene variant and thiopurine-induced toxicity in Asian patients. The present study intends to explore the role of the NUDT15 variant (C415T) in Indian patients on thiopurine therapy. METHODS:NUDT15 and TPMT genotyping were performed using amplification-refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) and the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) technique. RESULTS: Of 370 samples received for TPMT testing, 206 samples were available for NUDT15 genotyping. The NUDT15 risk allele frequency was 10.7%, with the frequency of wild, heterozygous and mutant genotypes being 80.6%, 17.5% and 1.9%, respectively. TPMT variants were seen in 13 of 370 (3.5%) patients, whereas the NUDT15 variant was seen in 40 of 206 (19.4%) patients. Thiopurine-induced toxicity information was available for 101 patients, among whom 10 developed leukopenia and all harbored the NUDT15 variant (p<0.0001). NUDT15 was clinically more relevant than TPMT in terms of sensitivity and specificity, as well as with a statistically significant difference in thiopurine dose requirement for patients with the NUDT15 variant. CONCLUSIONS: A preemptive NUDT15 genotyping approach can therefore help identify high-risk patients (NUDT15C415T positive) who could benefit from thiopurine dose reduction, thereby preventing fatal thiopurine-induced toxicity.