Literature DB >> 29468445

Tumor microenvironment after biodegradable BCNU wafer implantation: special consideration of immune system.

Ichiyo Shibahara1, Mitsuto Hanihara2, Takashi Watanabe3, Mitsuru Dan2, Sumito Sato2, Hiroki Kuroda2, Akinori Inamura2, Madoka Inukai4, Atsuko Hara4, Yoshie Yasui2, Toshihiro Kumabe2.   

Abstract

Biomaterials to treat cancers hold therapeutic potential; however, their translation to bedside treatment requires further study. The carmustine (1,3-bis (2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea; BCNU) wafer, a biodegradable polymer, currently is the only drug that is able to be placed at the surgical site to treat malignant tumors. However, how this wafer affects the surrounding tumor microenvironment is not well understood to date. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with glioblastoma treated with and without BCNU wafers who underwent repeat resection at tumor recurrence. We investigated radiological imaging; the interval between the two surgeries; and immunohistochemistry of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, FOXP3, and PD1. We implanted BCNU wafers in 41 newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients after approval of the wafer in Japan. Of them, 14 underwent surgery at recurrence and tissue was obtained from around the wafers. The interval between the first and second surgeries ranged from 63 to 421 days. The wafer could be observed on magnetic resonance imaging at up to 226 days, whereas intraoperatively the biodegraded material of the wafer could be found at up to 421 days after the initial surgery. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that CD8+ and CD68+ cells were significantly increased, but FOXP3+ cells did not increase, after wafer implantation compared to tissue from cases without wafer implantation. MRI data and immune cells, as well as interval between surgeries and immune cells, demonstrated positive correlation. These results helped us to understand the bioactivity of bioengineered materials and to establish a new approach for immunotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCNU wafer; Bioengineering; CD8; FOXP3; Gliadel

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29468445     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2733-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  48 in total

1.  Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes predict clinical outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sahar M A Mahmoud; Emma Claire Paish; Desmond G Powe; R Douglas Macmillan; Matthew J Grainge; Andrew H S Lee; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Paracrine immunotherapy with interleukin-2 and local chemotherapy is synergistic in the treatment of experimental brain tumors.

Authors:  P Sampath; J Hanes; F DiMeco; B M Tyler; D Brat; D M Pardoll; H Brem
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  A retrospective study of the safety of BCNU wafers with concurrent temozolomide and radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Edward Pan; Susan B Mitchell; Jerry S Tsai
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Intratumoural FOXP3-positive regulatory T cells are associated with adverse prognosis in radically resected gastric cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Perrone; Pier Adelchi Ruffini; Vincenzo Catalano; Cathie Spino; Daniele Santini; Pietro Muretto; Chiara Spoto; Costantino Zingaretti; Valerio Sisti; Paolo Alessandroni; Paolo Giordani; Andrea Cicetti; Silvia D'Emidio; Sergio Morini; Annamaria Ruzzo; Mauro Magnani; Giuseppe Tonini; Carla Rabitti; Francesco Graziano
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Biodegradable polymers for controlled delivery of chemotherapy with and without radiation therapy in the monkey brain.

Authors:  H Brem; R J Tamargo; A Olivi; M Pinn; J D Weingart; M Wharam; J I Epstein
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  FOXP3 expression and overall survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Merlo; Patrizia Casalini; Maria Luisa Carcangiu; Chiara Malventano; Tiziana Triulzi; Sylvie Mènard; Elda Tagliabue; Andrea Balsari
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Radiation modulates the peptide repertoire, enhances MHC class I expression, and induces successful antitumor immunotherapy.

Authors:  Eric A Reits; James W Hodge; Carla A Herberts; Tom A Groothuis; Mala Chakraborty; Elizabeth K Wansley; Kevin Camphausen; Rosalie M Luiten; Arnold H de Ru; Joost Neijssen; Alexander Griekspoor; Elly Mesman; Frank A Verreck; Hergen Spits; Jeffrey Schlom; Peter van Veelen; Jacques J Neefjes
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 14.307

8.  Chronic Phase Intracranial Hemorrhage Caused by Ruptured Pseudoaneurysm Induced by Carmustine Wafer Implantation for Insulo-opercular Anaplastic Astrocytoma: A Case Report.

Authors:  Kimitoshi Sato; Mitsuru Dan; Daisuke Yamamoto; Yoshiteru Miyajima; Atsuko Hara; Toshihiro Kumabe
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Polifeprosan 20, 3.85% carmustine slow-release wafer in malignant glioma: evidence for role in era of standard adjuvant temozolomide.

Authors:  Lawrence Kleinberg
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2012-10-26

10.  Tumour-infiltrating CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocytes as predictors of clinical outcome in glioma.

Authors:  S Han; C Zhang; Q Li; J Dong; Y Liu; Y Huang; T Jiang; A Wu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Ventricular opening and cerebrospinal fluid circulation accelerate the biodegradation process of carmustine wafers suggesting their immunomodulation potential in the human brain.

Authors:  Ichiyo Shibahara; Yukiko Shibahara; Hiroyuki Hagiwara; Takashi Watanabe; Yasushi Orihashi; Hajime Handa; Madoka Inukai; Takuichiro Hide; Yoshie Yasui; Toshihiro Kumabe
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.506

2.  Symptomatic cerebral vasospasm in the setting of carmustine wafer placement for glioblastoma: A case presentation and review of literature.

Authors:  Maheen Qamar Khan; Cristian Cirjan; Nabiha Quadri; Georgios Alexopoulos; Jeroen Coppens
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-06-27

Review 3.  Addressing BBB Heterogeneity: A New Paradigm for Drug Delivery to Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Jessica I Griffith; Sneha Rathi; Wenqiu Zhang; Wenjuan Zhang; Lester R Drewes; Jann N Sarkaria; William F Elmquist
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 6.321

4.  Identification of a Prognostic Microenvironment-Related Gene Signature in Glioblastoma Patients Treated with Carmustine Wafers.

Authors:  Ivana Manini; Emiliano Dalla; Vera Vendramin; Daniela Cesselli; Carla Di Loreto; Miran Skrap; Tamara Ius
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 5.  Implantable Drug Delivery Systems and Foreign Body Reaction: Traversing the Current Clinical Landscape.

Authors:  Alexey Fayzullin; Alesia Bakulina; Karen Mikaelyan; Anatoly Shekhter; Anna Guller
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.