BACKGROUND: Physicians need to rapidly and effectively facilitate patient-centered, shared decision-making (SDM) conversations, but little is known about how residents or attending physicians acquire this skill. OBJECTIVE: We explored emergency medicine (EM) attending physicians' use of SDM in the context of their experience as former residents and current educators and assessed the implications of these findings on learning opportunities for residents. METHODS: We used semistructured interviews with a purposeful sample of EM physicians. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and 3 research team members performed iterative, open coding of transcripts, building a provisional codebook as work progressed. We analyzed the data with a focus on participants' acquisition and use of skills required for SDM and their use of SDM in the context of resident education. RESULTS: Fifteen EM physicians from academic and community practices were interviewed. All reported using SDM techniques to some degree. Multiple themes noted had negative implications for resident acquisition of this skill: (1) the complex relationships among patients, residents, and attending physicians; (2) residents' skill levels; (3) the setting of busy emergency departments; and (4) individual attending factors. One theme was noted to facilitate resident education: the changing culture-with a cultural shift toward patient-centered care. CONCLUSIONS: A constellation of factors may diminish opportunities for residents to acquire and practice SDM skills. Further research should explore residents' perspectives, address the modifiable obstacles identified, and examine whether these issues generalize to other specialties.
BACKGROUND: Physicians need to rapidly and effectively facilitate patient-centered, shared decision-making (SDM) conversations, but little is known about how residents or attending physicians acquire this skill. OBJECTIVE: We explored emergency medicine (EM) attending physicians' use of SDM in the context of their experience as former residents and current educators and assessed the implications of these findings on learning opportunities for residents. METHODS: We used semistructured interviews with a purposeful sample of EM physicians. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and 3 research team members performed iterative, open coding of transcripts, building a provisional codebook as work progressed. We analyzed the data with a focus on participants' acquisition and use of skills required for SDM and their use of SDM in the context of resident education. RESULTS: Fifteen EM physicians from academic and community practices were interviewed. All reported using SDM techniques to some degree. Multiple themes noted had negative implications for resident acquisition of this skill: (1) the complex relationships among patients, residents, and attending physicians; (2) residents' skill levels; (3) the setting of busy emergency departments; and (4) individual attending factors. One theme was noted to facilitate resident education: the changing culture-with a cultural shift toward patient-centered care. CONCLUSIONS: A constellation of factors may diminish opportunities for residents to acquire and practice SDM skills. Further research should explore residents' perspectives, address the modifiable obstacles identified, and examine whether these issues generalize to other specialties.
Authors: Christiane Bieber; Jennifer Nicolai; Mechthild Hartmann; Klaus Blumenstiel; Nadja Ringel; Antonius Schneider; Martin Härter; Wolfgang Eich; Andreas Loh Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2009-04-28
Authors: Ruth B Hoppe; Ann M King; Kathleen M Mazor; Gail E Furman; Penelope Wick-Garcia; Heather Corcoran-Ponisciak; Peter J Katsufrakis Journal: Acad Med Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Erik P Hess; Corita R Grudzen; Richard Thomson; Ali S Raja; Christopher R Carpenter Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2015-06-25 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Hemal K Kanzaria; Robert H Brook; Marc A Probst; Dustin Harris; Sandra H Berry; Jerome R Hoffman Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Erik P Hess; Meghan A Knoedler; Nilay D Shah; Jeffrey A Kline; Maggie Breslin; Megan E Branda; Laurie J Pencille; Brent R Asplin; David M Nestler; Annie T Sadosty; Ian G Stiell; Henry H Ting; Victor M Montori Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2012-04-10
Authors: France Légaré; Nora Moumjid-Ferdjaoui; Renée Drolet; Dawn Stacey; Martin Härter; Hilda Bastian; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Francine Borduas; Cathy Charles; Angela Coulter; Sophie Desroches; Gwendolyn Friedrich; Amiram Gafni; Ian D Graham; Michel Labrecque; Annie LeBlanc; Jean Légaré; Mary Politi; Joan Sargeant; Richard Thomson Journal: J Contin Educ Health Prof Date: 2013 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Karen R Sepucha; Leigh H Simmons; Michael J Barry; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Adam M Licurse; Sreekanth K Chaguturu Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Sarah L Goff; Gwendolyn Downs; Robert J Wenger; Peter K Lindenauer; Kathleen M Mazor Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Ellen M Driever; Ivo M Tolhuizen; Robbert J Duvivier; Anne M Stiggelbout; Paul L P Brand Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 2.463