| Literature DB >> 29467598 |
Artur Juszkiewicz1, Piotr Basta2, Elżbieta Petriczko3, Bogusław Machaliński4, Jerzy Trzeciak5, Karolina Łuczkowska4, Anna Skarpańska-Stejnborn5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the response of selected components of the immune system in rowers to maximal physical exercise, and to verify if this response can be modulated by supplementation with spirulina (cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis).Entities:
Keywords: Flow cytometry; Inflammation; Rowers; Spirulina; Strenuous exercise; Supplementation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29467598 PMCID: PMC5819236 DOI: 10.1186/s12970-018-0213-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr ISSN: 1550-2783 Impact factor: 5.150
Basic characteristics of the study groups
| Parameters | Supplemented group ( | Placebo group ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 20.4 ± 0.84 | 20.0 ± 0.71 |
| Body mass (kg) | 84.4 ± 8.43 | 87.1 ± 5.80 |
| Body height (cm) | 192.3 ± 4.32 | 190.8 ± 3.89 |
| Duration of training (years) | 7.3 ± 1.3 | 6.8 ± 1.8 |
Values represent means ± standard deviations. No statistically significant differences were found for all intergroup comparisons (P > 0.05)
Training schedule for the week preceding blood sampling during the 1st and the 2nd examination
|
| |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Total training time, min/day | 120 | 150 | 200 | 190 | 210 | 140 | 120 |
| Time rowed, min/day | 110 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 70 | 90 | 100 |
| Distance rowed, km/day | 22 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 16 | 18 | 20 |
| Training for force development, min/day | – | – | 90 | – | 70 | – | – |
| Extensive endurance rowing training time, min/day | 70 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 40 | 90 | 100 |
| High intensity endurance rowing training time, min/day | 40 | – | – | 40 | 30 | – | – |
| Unspecific training (running, etc.), min/day | 10 | 50 | 10 | 90 | 70 | 50 | 20 |
|
| |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Total training time, min/day | 110 | 120 | 100 | 160 | 200 | 120 | 130 |
| Time rowed, min/day | 100 | 100 | 90 | 90 | 120 | 100 | 120 |
| Distance rowed, km/day | 20 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Training for force development, min/day | – | – | – | 60 | 60 | – | – |
| Extensive endurance rowing training time, min/day | 80 | 70 | 90 | 90 | 94 | 80 | 125 |
| High intensity endurance rowing training time, min/day | 6 | 9 | – | – | 12 | 20 | 5 |
| Very high intensity endurance rowing training time, min/day | 14 | 21 | – | – | 14 | – | – |
| Unspecific training (running, etc.), min/day | 10 | 20 | 20 | 10 | 20 | 20 | 10 |
Antibodies used for identification of lymphocyte subpopulations
| Lymphocyte subpopulation | Antibody |
|---|---|
| Regulatory T lymphocytes | FITC Mouse Anti-Human CD4 |
| PE Mouse Anti-Human CD25 | |
| Alexa Fluor 647 Mouse anti-Human CD127 | |
| Cytotoxic lymphocytes | APC Mouse Anti-Human CD8 |
| FITC Mouse Anti-Human TCR αβ | |
| NK cells | FITC Mouse Anti-Human CD3 |
| PE Mouse Anti-Human CD16 | |
| APC Mouse Anti-Human CD56 | |
| TCRδ/γ lymphocytes | FITC Mouse Anti-Human TCRδ/γ |
Changes in 2,000 m rowing ergometer performance before and after supplementation
| Parameters | Supplemented group ( | Placebo group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | |
| Power (Watt) | 425 ± 30.89 | 425 ± 28.98 | 409 ± 26.8 | 414 ± 34.24 |
| LAmin (mmol x L-1)a | 1.8 ± 0.23 | 1.9 ± 0.27 | 1.7 ± 0.23 | 1.7 ± 0.34 |
| LAmax (mmol x L-1)a | 13.8 ± 1.96 | 10.7 ± 1.87 | 13.6 ± 2.11 | 10.2 ± 3.34 |
| Time (s) | 375.2 ± 9.43 | 374.4 ± 8.63 | 379.6 ± 8.35 | 378.1 ± 10.45 |
Values represent means ± standard deviations. aLA, lactate acid. No statistically significant differences were found between the pre- and post-supplementation results (P<0.05)
Fig. 1Changes in Treg (a), NK cell (b), Tδγ cell (c) and CTL (d) counts during exercise tests performed prior to and after the supplementation (mean ± SD). Note. Tregs = regulatory T cells; NK = natural killer cells; Tδγ = gamma delta T cells; CLT = cytotoxic T lymphocytes; gray box - SUPPL = supplemented group; □ - PLA = placebo group; B = baseline; Ex = post-exercise; R = after a 1-day recovery; # - significantly different compared to the baseline level; * - significantly different compared to the post-exercise level
Fig. 2Treg/(NK + Tδγ + CTL) ratio (a), Treg/NK ratio (b), Treg/Tδγ ratio (c) and Treg/CTL (d) ratio during exercise tests performed prior to and after the supplementation (mean ± SD). Note. Tregs = regulatory T cells; NK = natural killer cells; Tδγ = gamma delta T cells; CTL = cytotoxic T lymphocytes; gray box - SUPPL = supplemented group; □ − PLA = placebo group; B = baseline; Ex = post-exercise; R = after a 1-day recovery; # - significantly different compared to baseline level; * - significantly different compared to post-exercise level; † − significantly different compared to PLA group