Chai Kobkitsuksakul1, Oranan Tritanon2, Vichan Suraratdecha2. 1. Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University School of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University School of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The distribution of ischemic changes caused by infarction of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territories is usually measured using the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS). The first interpreter of the brain computed tomography (CT) in the emergency department is the on-call radiology resident. The primary objective of this study was to describe the agreement of the ASPECTS performed retrospectively by the resident compared with expert raters. The second objective was to ascertain the appropriate window setting for early detection of acute ischemic stroke and good interobserver agreement between the interpreters. METHODS: We identified consecutive patients presenting with hemiparesis or aphasia at the emergency department who underwent brain CT and CT angiography. Each scan was rated using ASPECTS by senior radiology resident, neuroradiology fellow, and later by consensus between two expert raters. Statistical analysis included determination of Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: A total of 43 patients met our study criteria. Interobserver agreements for ASPECTS varied from 0.486 to 0.678 in Cohen's κ coefficient between consensus of two neuroradiologists and a neuroradiology fellow, and from 0.198 to 0.491 for consensus between two neuroradiologists and a senior radiology resident. ICC among three raters (expert consensus, neuroradiology fellow, and senior radiology resident), was very good when 8 HU window width and 32 HU center level setting was used. CONCLUSION: ASPECTS varied among raters. However, when using a narrowed window setting for interpretation, interobserver agreement improved.
PURPOSE: The distribution of ischemic changes caused by infarction of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territories is usually measured using the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS). The first interpreter of the brain computed tomography (CT) in the emergency department is the on-call radiology resident. The primary objective of this study was to describe the agreement of the ASPECTS performed retrospectively by the resident compared with expert raters. The second objective was to ascertain the appropriate window setting for early detection of acute ischemic stroke and good interobserver agreement between the interpreters. METHODS: We identified consecutive patients presenting with hemiparesis or aphasia at the emergency department who underwent brain CT and CT angiography. Each scan was rated using ASPECTS by senior radiology resident, neuroradiology fellow, and later by consensus between two expert raters. Statistical analysis included determination of Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: A total of 43 patients met our study criteria. Interobserver agreements for ASPECTS varied from 0.486 to 0.678 in Cohen's κ coefficient between consensus of two neuroradiologists and a neuroradiology fellow, and from 0.198 to 0.491 for consensus between two neuroradiologists and a senior radiology resident. ICC among three raters (expert consensus, neuroradiology fellow, and senior radiology resident), was very good when 8 HU window width and 32 HU center level setting was used. CONCLUSION: ASPECTS varied among raters. However, when using a narrowed window setting for interpretation, interobserver agreement improved.
Authors: A Furlan; R Higashida; L Wechsler; M Gent; H Rowley; C Kase; M Pessin; A Ahuja; F Callahan; W M Clark; F Silver; F Rivera Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-12-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ryan A McTaggart; Tudor G Jovin; Maarten G Lansberg; Michael Mlynash; Mahesh V Jayaraman; Omar A Choudhri; Manabu Inoue; Michael P Marks; Gregory W Albers Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: P A Barber; M D Hill; M Eliasziw; A M Demchuk; J H W Pexman; M E Hudon; A Tomanek; R Frayne; A M Buchan Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Olga Finlayson; Verity John; Robert Yeung; Dar Dowlatshahi; Peter Howard; Liying Zhang; Rick Swartz; Richard I Aviv Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: William J Powers; Colin P Derdeyn; José Biller; Christopher S Coffey; Brian L Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Karen C Johnston; S Claiborne Johnston; Alexander A Khalessi; Chelsea S Kidwell; James F Meschia; Bruce Ovbiagele; Dileep R Yavagal Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 10.170
Authors: V K Sundaram; J Goldstein; D Wheelwright; A Aggarwal; P S Pawha; A Doshi; J T Fifi; R De Leacy; J Mocco; J Puig; K Nael Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mingxue Jing; Joshua Y P Yeo; Staffan Holmin; Tommy Andersson; Fabian Arnberg; Paul Bhogal; Cunli Yang; Anil Gopinathan; Tian Ming Tu; Benjamin Yong Qiang Tan; Ching Hui Sia; Hock Luen Teoh; Prakash R Paliwal; Bernard P L Chan; Vijay Sharma; Leonard L L Yeo Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2021-10-28 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Jonathan M Parish; Jeremy B Rhoten; Dale Strong; Tanushree Prasad; Andrew Hines; Joe D Bernard; Jonathan Clemente; Rahul Karamchandani; Andrew W Asimos; William R Stetler Journal: Cureus Date: 2022-05-20
Authors: Dylan N Wolman; Fasco van Ommen; Elizabeth Tong; Frans Kauw; Jan Willem Dankbaar; Edwin Bennink; Hugo W A M de Jong; Lior Molvin; Max Wintermark; Jeremy J Heit Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 4.379