Literature DB >> 29466920

Trajectory of Functional Independent Measurements during First Five Years after Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Juan Lu1,2, Cecilie Roe3,4, Solrun Sigurdardottir5,2, Nada Andelic3,2, Marit Forslund3.   

Abstract

A better understanding of long-term functional recovery process for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) facilitates effective rehabilitations. The aim of this study was to classify and characterize patients with moderate-to-severe TBI based on their functional trajectories up to 5 years post-injury. The study included 121 patients with moderate-to-severe TBIs (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10], S06.0-S06.9), 16-55 years of age, and admitted at Trauma Referral Hospital within 24 h of injury between 2005 and 2007. Demographics and injury characteristics were documented at the admission, and functional status was recorded at 3 months and 1 and 5 years post-injury using Functional Independence Measure motor (FIM-M) and cognitive (FIM-C) subscales. We used group-based trajectory models to classify patients' functional trajectories over a 5-year period. For FIM-M, three trajectories were identified: 8.2% of patients showed stable low recovery (13.6 ± 1.5, 17.9 ± 8.8, and 21.0 ± 17.9), 9.2% elevated good recovery (35.8 ± 14.5, 75.5 ± 12.4, and 85.5 ± 8.1), and 82.6% stable good recovery (89.0 ± 3.6, 90.3 ± 1.9, and 90.8 ± 1.0) at the three follow-up points, respectively. For FIM-C, four trajectories were revealed: 4.1% of patients showed stable low recovery (5.0 ± 0, 5.0 ± 0, and 5.0 ± 0), 12.6% delayed moderate recovery (8.9 ± 3.5, 20.6 ± 4.6, and 28.3 ± 3.8), 28.7% elevated good recovery (27.0 ± 3.8, 30.4 ± 7.3, and 31.1 ± 2.3), and 54.6% stable good recovery (32.8 ± 2.3, 34.6 ± 1.0, and 34.7 ± 1.0). The results suggest that three FIM-M and four FIM-C trajectories described various patterns of functional recovery 5 years after moderate-to-severe TBI, with stable good recovery being the most common trajectory. Identifying and characterizing the trajectory memberships should enable targeted rehabilitation programs, inform patient-centered care, and improve long-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional independent measurements; outcome trajectory; traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29466920      PMCID: PMC6016092          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  32 in total

1.  Prevalence of long-term disability from traumatic brain injury in the civilian population of the United States, 2005.

Authors:  Eduard Zaloshnja; Ted Miller; Jean A Langlois; Anbesaw W Selassie
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.710

2.  Identifying longitudinal trajectories of emotional distress symptoms 5 years after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  S Sigurdardottir; N Andelic; C Roe; A K Schanke
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals.

Authors:  K M Hall; T Bushnik; B Lakisic-Kazazic; J Wright; A Cantagallo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Longitudinal outcome of patients with disordered consciousness in the NIDRR TBI Model Systems Programs.

Authors:  Risa Nakase-Richardson; John Whyte; Joseph T Giacino; Shital Pavawalla; Scott D Barnett; Stuart A Yablon; Mark Sherer; Kathleen Kalmar; Flora M Hammond; Brian Greenwald; Lawrence J Horn; Ron Seel; Marissa McCarthy; Johanna Tran; William C Walker
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Longitudinal description of the glasgow outcome scale-extended for individuals in the traumatic brain injury model systems national database: a National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research traumatic brain injury model systems study.

Authors:  Christopher R Pretz; Kristen Dams-O'Connor
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Disability, physical health and mental health 1 year after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Nada Andelic; Solrun Sigurdardottir; Anne-Kristine Schanke; Leiv Sandvik; Unni Sveen; Cecilie Roe
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.033

7.  Trajectories of Functional Change After Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Bret T Howrey; James E Graham; Monique R Pappadis; Carl V Granger; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Long-term disability and survival in traumatic brain injury: results from the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Model Systems.

Authors:  Jordan C Brooks; David J Strauss; Robert M Shavelle; David R Paculdo; Flora M Hammond; Cynthia L Harrison-Felix
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  US population estimates of health and social outcomes 5 years after rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  John D Corrigan; Jeffrey P Cuthbert; Cynthia Harrison-Felix; Gale G Whiteneck; Jeneita M Bell; A Cate Miller; Victor G Coronado; Christopher R Pretz
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.710

10.  Ten-year outcomes following traumatic brain injury: a population-based cohort.

Authors:  C M Cameron; D M Purdie; E V Kliewer; R J McClure
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  2 in total

1.  Divergent Six Month Functional Recovery Trajectories and Predictors after Traumatic Brain Injury: Novel Insights from the Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment Trial Study.

Authors:  Raquel C Gardner; Jing Cheng; Adam R Ferguson; Ross Boylan; John Boscardin; Ross D Zafonte; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Data Mining to Understand How Health Status Preceding Traumatic Brain Injury Affects Functional Outcome: A Population-Based Sex-Stratified Study.

Authors:  Vincy Chan; Mitchell Sutton; Tatyana Mollayeva; Michael D Escobar; Mackenzie Hurst; Angela Colantonio
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 3.966

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.