Literature DB >> 29465747

Antibiotics for treating gonorrhoea in pregnancy.

Gabriella Comunián-Carrasco1, Guiomar E Peña-Martí, Arturo J Martí-Carvajal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gonorrhoea is a sexually transmitted infection that is caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and is a major public health challenge today. N gonorrhoeae can be transmitted from the mother's genital tract to the newborn during birth, and can cause gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum as well as systemic neonatal infections. It can also cause endometritis and pelvic sepsis in the mother. This review updates and replaces an earlier Cochrane Review on antibiotics for treating this infectious condition.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical effectiveness and harms of antibiotics for treating gonorrhoea in pregnant women. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 May 2017), LILACS database (1982 to April 5, 2017), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP; April 5, 2017), ClinicalTrials.gov (April 5, 2017), the ISRCTN Registry (April 5, 2017), and Epistemonikos (April 5, 2017). We also searched reference lists of all retrieved articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of antibiotics for treating gonorrhoea in pregnancy. The antibiotics could have been used alone or in combination, were administered parenterally, orally, or both, and were compared with another antibiotic.We included RCTs regardless of their publication status (published, unpublished, published as an article, an abstract, or a letter), language, or country. We applied no limits on the length of follow-up.We excluded RCTs using a cluster- or cross-over design, or quasi-RCTs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data, and checked them for accuracy. MAIN
RESULTS: We included two RCTs, that randomised 514 pregnant women (347 women analysed) at a mean gestational age of 22 weeks. Both trials were conducted in the outpatient department of the same two hospitals in the USA between 1993 and 2001, and had a follow-up of 14 days. One of the trials was sponsored by a drug company. We considered both trials to be at a high risk of bias.One trial compared ceftriaxone (125 mg, intramuscular) with cefixime (400 mg, oral); the other trial had three arms, and assessed ceftriaxone (250 mg, intramuscular) versus either amoxicillin (3 g, oral) plus probenecid (1 g, oral) or spectinomycin (2 g, intramuscular). We did not include the spectinomycin data because this medication is no longer produced. We were unable to conduct meta-analysis because the trials compared different medications.We found inconclusive evidence that there were clear differences in the cure of gonococcal infections (genital, extragenital, or both) between intramuscular ceftriaxone versus oral amoxicillin plus oral probenecid (risk ratio (RR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98 to 1.16; one RCT; 168 women; very low-quality evidence) or intramuscular ceftriaxone versus oral cefixime (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.08; one RCT; 95 women; very low-quality evidence).Neither of the trials reported on two of this review's primary maternal outcomes: incidence of obstetric complications (miscarriage, premature rupture of membranes, preterm delivery, or fetal death), or disseminated gonococcal infection, or on the incidence of neonatorum ophthalmia in the neonates.One trial reported one case of vomiting in the oral amoxacillin plus probenecid group. Trials reported pain at the injection sites, but did not quantify it. Hyperberbilurrubinemia was more frequent in neonates whose mothers were exposed to ceftriaxone. There were no clear differences between groups for neonatal malformation. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: This Cochrane Review found high levels of cure of gonococcal infections in pregnancy with the given antibiotic regimens. However, the evidence in this review is inconclusive as it does not support one particular regimen over another. This conclusion was based on very low-quality evidence (downgraded for poor trial design, imprecision) from two trials (involving 514 women), which we assessed to be at a high risk of bias for a number of domains. The harm profiles of the antibiotic regimes featured in this review remain unknown.High-quality RCTs are needed, with sufficient power to assess the clinical effectiveness and potential harms of antibiotics in pregnant women with gonorrhoea. These should be planned according to Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT),conducted following CONSORT recommendations, and based on Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29465747      PMCID: PMC6491276          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011167.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  28 in total

1.  Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Stephen J W Evans; Peter C Gøtzsche; Robert T O'Neill; Douglas G Altman; Kenneth Schulz; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy: prevalence, impact on pregnancy outcomes, and approach to treatment in developing countries.

Authors:  S Mullick; D Watson-Jones; M Beksinska; D Mabey
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 3.  Single-center trials tend to provide larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Susanne Unverzagt; Roland Prondzinsky; Frank Peinemann
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  On improving research methodology in clinical trials.

Authors:  Vance W Berger; J Rosser Matthews; Eric N Grosch
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-19

6.  What's in a gold standard? In defence of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Marius Backmann
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-12

Review 7.  Gonorrhea Control, United States, 1972-2015, A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Thomas A Peterman; Kevin O'Connor; Heather M Bradley; Elizabeth A Torrone; Kyle T Bernstein
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Treatment of gonorrhea in pregnancy.

Authors:  M R Cavenee; J R Farris; T R Spalding; D L Barnes; Y S Castaneda; G D Wendel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Antibiotics for treating gonorrhoea in pregnancy.

Authors:  Gabriella Comunián-Carrasco; Guiomar E Peña-Martí; Arturo J Martí-Carvajal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-21

10.  Prevalence of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in Sexually Experienced Women of Reproductive Age - United States, 2013-2014.

Authors:  Kristen Kreisel; Elizabeth Torrone; Kyle Bernstein; Jaeyoung Hong; Rachel Gorwitz
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Nonviral sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy: current controversies and new challenges.

Authors:  Andreea Waltmann; Tyler R McKinnish; Joseph A Duncan
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.915

Review 2.  Antibiotics for treating gonorrhoea in pregnancy.

Authors:  Gabriella Comunián-Carrasco; Guiomar E Peña-Martí; Arturo J Martí-Carvajal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.