BACKGROUND: Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) face higher rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) compared with the general population. The association between venues where sexual partners are met and STI transmission is dynamic and poorly understood, especially among those who use geosocial networking (GSN) apps. This study aimed to determine whether there is a difference in STI incidence between MSM who met their last sexual partner through a GSN app and MSM who met their last partner via other venues. METHODS: Data were analyzed from HIV-negative MSM attending the Los Angeles LBGT Center between August 2015 and July 2016 (n = 9499). Logistic regression models were used to investigate the relationship between STI incidence and whether or not an individual met his last partner through a GSN app. RESULTS: No relationship was detected between STI incidence and whether one's last sexual partner was met via GSN app. However, an association was detected between STI incidence and having used GSN apps to meet sexual partners in the past 3 months. A dose-response relationship was observed between the number of venues used to meet partners and testing positive for any STI (adjusted odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.14). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between how people meet sexual partners and STI acquisition is much more nuanced than previously thought. Geosocial networking apps do not inherently expose users to high-risk reservoirs of STIs, but further understanding of the complexity of sexual networks and networking methods is warranted, given increasing rates of STIs.
BACKGROUND: Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) face higher rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) compared with the general population. The association between venues where sexual partners are met and STI transmission is dynamic and poorly understood, especially among those who use geosocial networking (GSN) apps. This study aimed to determine whether there is a difference in STI incidence between MSM who met their last sexual partner through a GSN app and MSM who met their last partner via other venues. METHODS: Data were analyzed from HIV-negative MSM attending the Los Angeles LBGT Center between August 2015 and July 2016 (n = 9499). Logistic regression models were used to investigate the relationship between STI incidence and whether or not an individual met his last partner through a GSN app. RESULTS: No relationship was detected between STI incidence and whether one's last sexual partner was met via GSN app. However, an association was detected between STI incidence and having used GSNapps to meet sexual partners in the past 3 months. A dose-response relationship was observed between the number of venues used to meet partners and testing positive for any STI (adjusted odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.14). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between how people meet sexual partners and STI acquisition is much more nuanced than previously thought. Geosocial networking apps do not inherently expose users to high-risk reservoirs of STIs, but further understanding of the complexity of sexual networks and networking methods is warranted, given increasing rates of STIs.
Authors: Michael W Plankey; David G Ostrow; Ron Stall; Christopher Cox; Xiuhong Li; James A Peck; Lisa P Jacobson Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Matthew R Beymer; Robert E Weiss; Robert K Bolan; Ellen T Rudy; Linda B Bourque; Jeffrey P Rodriguez; Donald E Morisky Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Susan P Buchbinder; Eric Vittinghoff; Patrick J Heagerty; Connie L Celum; George R Seage; Franklyn N Judson; David McKirnan; Kenneth H Mayer; Beryl A Koblin Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Kate Buchacz; Willi McFarland; Timothy A Kellogg; Lisa Loeb; Scott D Holmberg; James Dilley; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: AIDS Date: 2005-09-02 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Eli S Rosenberg; Patrick S Sullivan; Elizabeth A Dinenno; Laura F Salazar; Travis H Sanchez Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-03-25 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Snigdha Vallabhaneni; J Jeff McConnell; Lisa Loeb; Wendy Hartogensis; Fredrick M Hecht; Robert M Grant; Christopher D Pilcher Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: William C Goedel; Cassandra Sutten Coats; Genoviva Sowemimo-Coker; Ethan Moitra; Matthew J Murphy; Jacob J van den Berg; Philip A Chan; Amy S Nunn Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2020-11-24
Authors: Yang Ni; Hengan Liu; Ruijie Gong; Mei Shi; Shuxian Zhang; Suping Wang; Yong Cai Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Parya Saberi; Torsten B Neilands; Michelle A Lally; Sybil G Hosek; Lisa Hightow-Weidman Journal: J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care Date: 2019 Jan-Dec