H P Neeff1, P A Holzner2, M Menzel2, P Bronsert3, A Klock2, S A Lang2, S Fichtner-Feigl2, U T Hopt2, F Makowiec2. 1. Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hugstetterstraße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland. hannes.neeff@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 2. Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hugstetterstraße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland. 3. Institut für Klinische Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 115a, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is increasing worldwide. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment option. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study analyzed the prognostic factors after resection of ICC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 84 patients were surgically treated under potentially curative intent. Perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinomas were excluded. The 5‑year survival was analyzed with respect to tumor stage (TNM), number of lesions, complete surgical resection (R0), peritoneal carcinosis and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The 5‑year survival was 27% and 77% of patients underwent R0 resections. In the univariate analysis a T stage >2, an N+ situation or an R+ resection as well as peritoneal and multilocular intrahepatic spread were associated with a poorer prognosis. Postoperative complications also negatively influenced survival. On multivariate analysis the absence of peritoneal spread, node-negative tumor stages, singular hepatic lesions and a low T stage as well as the absence of complications were associated with improved survival. DISCUSSION: The prognosis of ICC is poor even after successful surgical resection. Well-known tumor characteristics such as TNM are relevant prognostic factors. Surgical resection is accompanied by postoperative complications (most frequently biliary), which negatively influence survival. Adjuvant strategies are urgently needed to improve long-term survival even after complete surgical resection.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is increasing worldwide. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment option. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study analyzed the prognostic factors after resection of ICC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 84 patients were surgically treated under potentially curative intent. Perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinomas were excluded. The 5‑year survival was analyzed with respect to tumor stage (TNM), number of lesions, complete surgical resection (R0), peritoneal carcinosis and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The 5‑year survival was 27% and 77% of patients underwent R0 resections. In the univariate analysis a T stage >2, an N+ situation or an R+ resection as well as peritoneal and multilocular intrahepatic spread were associated with a poorer prognosis. Postoperative complications also negatively influenced survival. On multivariate analysis the absence of peritoneal spread, node-negative tumor stages, singular hepatic lesions and a low T stage as well as the absence of complications were associated with improved survival. DISCUSSION: The prognosis of ICC is poor even after successful surgical resection. Well-known tumor characteristics such as TNM are relevant prognostic factors. Surgical resection is accompanied by postoperative complications (most frequently biliary), which negatively influence survival. Adjuvant strategies are urgently needed to improve long-term survival even after complete surgical resection.
Authors: Juan Valle; Harpreet Wasan; Daniel H Palmer; David Cunningham; Alan Anthoney; Anthony Maraveyas; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Tim Iveson; Sharon Hughes; Stephen P Pereira; Michael Roughton; John Bridgewater Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bradley N Reames; Fabio Bagante; Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Andrea Ruzzenente; Matthew Weiss; Sorin Alexandrescu; Hugo P Marques; Luca Aldrighetti; Shishir K Maithel; Carlo Pulitano; Todd W Bauer; Feng Shen; George A Poultsides; Oliver Soubrane; Guillaume Martel; Bas G Koerkamp; Alfredo Guglielmi; Endo Itaru; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Jongha Park; Myung-Hwan Kim; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Do Hyun Park; Sung-Hoon Moon; Tae Jun Song; Junbum Eum; Sang Soo Lee; Dong Wan Seo; Sung Koo Lee Journal: Gut Liver Date: 2009-12-31 Impact factor: 4.519
Authors: Michelle L DeOliveira; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Farin Kamangar; Jordan M Winter; Keith D Lillemoe; Michael A Choti; Charles J Yeo; Richard D Schulick Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Alexandre Doussot; Mithat Gonen; Jimme K Wiggers; Bas Groot-Koerkamp; Ronald P DeMatteo; David Fuks; Peter J Allen; Olivier Farges; T Peter Kingham; Jean Marc Regimbeau; Michael I D'Angelica; Daniel Azoulay; William R Jarnagin Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-06-11 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Tania M Welzel; Barry I Graubard; Hashem B El-Serag; Yasser H Shaib; Ann W Hsing; Jessica A Davila; Katherine A McGlynn Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2007-08-06 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Shahid A Khan; Shireen Emadossadaty; Nimzing G Ladep; Howard C Thomas; Paul Elliott; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Mireille B Toledano Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 25.083