Literature DB >> 29464167

Use of Viable Cryopreserved Placental Membrane as an Adjunct to Facial Keloid Resection.

Rishi J Gupta1, Stephen T Connelly1, Rebeka G Silva1, Nat R Gwilliam1.   

Abstract

Keloids are the physical manifestation of an exaggerated inflammatory response resulting in excess collagen deposition. The resulting fibroproliferative mass can be distressing for patients due to appearance, pruritus, and/or pain. Despite extensive research into the pathophysiology of keloid formation and the development of numerous treatments, keloids remain a challenge to treat. Even when the initial treatment is successful, a risk of recurrence remains. Basic science research into viable cryopreserved placental membranes and viable cryopreserved umbilical tissue has demonstrated their anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects, which may decrease keloid recurrence after excision. In this article, we present the first-reported case of viable cryopreserved placental membrane, with living mesenchymal stem cells, to treat a painful preauricular keloid in conjunction with surgical resection.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29464167      PMCID: PMC5811297          DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open        ISSN: 2169-7574


INTRODUCTION

Normal wound healing proceeds through a well-defined cascade of hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and maturation phases that are characterized by complex cellular interactions and cytokine signaling pathways. Keloids occur due to dysregulation of fibroblast activity during the inflammatory phase, resulting in excess collagen deposition extending beyond the boundaries of the original wound.[1,2] Treatments targeting fibroblasts and downregulating inflammation—including steroids, radiation, and interferon—make up the majority of interventions for pathological scarring.[2-4] Although surgical resection of the keloid removes scar tissue, surgery also triggers an inflammatory response, thus increasing risk of keloid recurrence. For that reason, surgery may be paired with anti-inflammatory agents, such as a series of postoperative steroid injections or irradiation. However, these modalities carry side effects that can be severe and systemic.[1] Viable cryopreserved placental membrane (vCPM) retains all components and properties of fresh tissue, including anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, and pro-angiogenic effects via paracrine signaling.[5-8] These make vCPM a potential surgical adjunct in prevention of scar formation in keloid-prone patients. In this article, we present a case of a keloid successfully managed with resection and vCPM implantation before surgical wound closure.

CASE REPORT

The patient is a 62-year-old male with bilateral temporomandibular (TMJ) disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, hypertension, and tobacco use who underwent bilateral TMJ arthroplasty. The arthroplasties were performed sequentially without complication. The patient subsequently returned to clinic with complaints of pain and discomfort along his left preauricular incision where a keloid had formed (Fig. 1). All other incisions had healed normally.
Fig. 1.

Left preauricular keloid.

Left preauricular keloid. Twenty-one months after his left-sided TMJ arthroplasty, the patient underwent surgical resection of the keloid. An elliptical incision was made around the keloid with a #15 scalpel, with the deep portion of the scar removed sharply. The surgeon undermined surrounding skin with facelift scissors until the tissue could be approximated without tension. A strip of vCPM was then placed in the base of the wound (Fig. 2). The tissue was closed with a 4-0 absorbable monofilament in the deep dermis and a running continuous 5-0 nylon skin closure (Fig. 3). Dressing included bacitracin, nonadherent barrier, and Tegaderm.
Fig. 2.

vCPM in wound bed after resection of scar tissue.

Fig. 3.

Layered closure with running 5-0 nylon suture.

vCPM in wound bed after resection of scar tissue. Layered closure with running 5-0 nylon suture. At follow-up 4 weeks later, the incision was clean, dry, and intact with no erythema or induration (Fig. 4). No keloid reformation occurred on subsequent 4- and 9-month follow-ups, at which point the scar was minimally visible and the patient pleased with the aesthetic results.
Fig. 4.

Healed wound at 4 weeks postoperatively.

Healed wound at 4 weeks postoperatively.

DISCUSSION

Pathological scars remain a challenge despite numerous treatment modalities.[2,3,9,10] One reason is the complexity of the pathomechanism for which there is no animal model, limiting our ability to study effects of treatments.[2,3,11] There are also few robust clinical studies assessing interventions. As a result, individual clinical experience has driven care. First-line treatment in the United States is typically corticosteroids, which matches international expert guidelines.[10-12] Monotherapy is often inadequate, however. Reported recurrence rates with steroids alone range from 9% to 50% but were found to decrease to 14.3% when combined with surgical resection.[3,13] Similarly, improved results with multimodal therapy were found combining surgery and irradiation, steroids and fluorouracil (5-FU), and so on.[1,3,10,11,14,15] Of note, many of these protocols require repeated interventions, such as monthly injections of steroids or botulinum toxin.[1,11] Ongoing research into the inflammatory mechanisms of keloid formation and clinical treatments has yet to find a durable solution. Within the literature and practice, there is an ongoing search for novel therapies with the hope of decreasing recurrence rates and ultimately preventing initial formation of keloids.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report is a proof of concept for use of vCPM in the treatment of fibroproliferative scar formation in conjunction with surgery. Though findings are limited as a case study, this novel approach is promising, and further clinical research is warranted.
  14 in total

Review 1.  International clinical recommendations on scar management.

Authors:  Thomas A Mustoe; Rodney D Cooter; Michael H Gold; F D Richard Hobbs; Albert-Adrien Ramelet; Peter G Shakespeare; Maurizio Stella; Luc Téot; Fiona M Wood; Ulrich E Ziegler
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies.

Authors:  Gerd G Gauglitz; Hans C Korting; Tatiana Pavicic; Thomas Ruzicka; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.354

3.  Understanding the Impact of Preservation Methods on the Integrity and Functionality of Placental Allografts.

Authors:  Amy Johnson; Alexandra Gyurdieva; Sandeep Dhall; Alla Danilkovitch; Yi Duan-Arnold
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 4.  Cellular and molecular pathology of HTS: basis for treatment.

Authors:  Alexis Armour; Paul G Scott; Edward E Tredget
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  Adjuvant irradiation to prevent keloidal fibroproliferative growth should be standard of care.

Authors:  M K Ramirez-Fort; B Meier; A Feily; S L Cooper; C S Lange
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 6.  Updated international clinical recommendations on scar management: part 1--evaluating the evidence.

Authors:  Michael H Gold; Brian Berman; Matteo Tretti Clementoni; Gerd G Gauglitz; Foad Nahai; Crystal Murcia
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.398

7.  Updated international clinical recommendations on scar management: part 2--algorithms for scar prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Michael H Gold; Michael McGuire; Thomas A Mustoe; Andrea Pusic; Mukta Sachdev; Jill Waibel; Crystal Murcia
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.398

8.  Management of keloids in the United States, 1990-2009: an analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

Authors:  Scott A Davis; Steven R Feldman; Amy J McMichael
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.398

9.  Angiogenic Potential of Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane Is Enhanced Through Retention of All Tissue Components in Their Native State.

Authors:  Yi Duan-Arnold; Thomas E Uveges; Alexandra Gyurdieva; Amy Johnson; Alla Danilkovitch
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Retention of Endogenous Viable Cells Enhances the Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Cryopreserved Amnion.

Authors:  Yi Duan-Arnold; Alexandra Gyurdieva; Amy Johnson; Thomas E Uveges; Douglas A Jacobstein; Alla Danilkovitch
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  2 in total

1.  A case of Dupuytren's disease managed with viable cryopreserved placental membrane adjunct to open palmar fasciectomy.

Authors:  Christopher M Dress; Elisabet K Tassis
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-03-31

2.  Properties of viable lyopreserved amnion are equivalent to viable cryopreserved amnion with the convenience of ambient storage.

Authors:  Sandeep Dhall; Malathi Sathyamoorthy; Jin-Qiang Kuang; Tyler Hoffman; Matthew Moorman; Anne Lerch; Vimal Jacob; Steven Michael Sinclair; Alla Danilkovitch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.