| Literature DB >> 29464117 |
Bridget M Stroup1, Denise M Ney1, Sangita G Murali1, Frances Rohr2, Sally T Gleason1, Sandra C van Calcar3, Harvey L Levy2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nutrient status in phenylketonuria (PKU) requires surveillance due to the restrictive low-Phe diet in combination with amino acid medical foods (AA-MF) or glycomacropeptide medical foods (GMP-MF). Micronutrient profiles of medical foods are diverse, and optimal micronutrient supplementation in PKU has not been established.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29464117 PMCID: PMC5804357 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6859820
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Metab ISSN: 2090-0724
Figure 1Experimental design. AA-MF, amino acid medical foods; GMP-MF, glycomacropeptide medical foods.
Participant characteristics1.
| Adult males | Adult females | Minors2 |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult and minors | Adults only | ||||
| Age, y | 28 ± 9 (18–44) | 30 ± 7 (23–49) | 16 ± 1 (15–17) | 0.003 | 0.64 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.2 ± 3.6 | 26.9 ± 5.3 | 23.2 ± 2.4 | 0.29 | 0.34 |
| BMI percentile | — | — | 69.6 ± 23.7 (30–93) | — | — |
| Plasma Phe, | 770 ± 217 (367–1086) | 658 ± 337 (201–1360) | 706 ± 540 (224–1418) | 0.63 | 0.52 |
| Classical PKU, | 8 | 10 | 2 | — | — |
| Variant PKU, | 2 | 5 | 3 | — | — |
| Kuvan™ user, | 1 | 2 | 2 | — | — |
1Data represent participant characteristic data collected at baseline (visit 1) for our clinical trial, n = 30 [8]. Values are means ± SD, and values in parenthesis represent the minimum and maximum. Subanalyses were done to compare adult male and female participants; 2of the five participants who were minors (<18 y), two were male and three were female; BMI, body mass index; PKU, phenylketonuria.
Daily macronutrient intake profiles in combination with AA-MF and GMP-MF1.
| Median and percentile nutrient intakes |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MF | GMP-MF | ||||||
| 10th | Median | 90th | 10th | Median | 90th | ||
| kcal | 1471 | 2076 | 2711 | 1523 | 2148 | 3152 | 0.33 |
| kcal/kg | 23 | 29 | 43 | 21 | 30 | 46 | 0.33 |
| kcal from MF | 162 | 393 | 913 | 340 | 694 | 1007 | 0.002 |
| kcal from NF | 969 | 1597 | 2247 | 905 | 1532 | 2467 | 0.53 |
| g protein | 61 | 76 | 107 | 56 | 81 | 109 | 0.81 |
| g protein/kg | 0.85 | 1.10 | 1.50 | 0.80 | 1.10 | 1.70 | 1.00 |
| g PE from MF | 33 | 59 | 75 | 30 | 53 | 73 | 0.98 |
| g PE from MF/kg | 0.47 | 0.78 | 1.10 | 0.45 | 0.76 | 1.03 | 0.94 |
| % PE from MF | 34% | 77% | 84% | 40% | 71% | 86% | 0.58 |
| g protein from NF | 12 | 20 | 46 | 11 | 22 | 58 | 0.88 |
| mg Phe | 487 | 924 | 1973 | 544 | 1014 | 2592 | 0.25 |
| mg Phe from MF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 85 | 137 | 0.0001† |
| mg Phe from NF | 487 | 924 | 1973 | 419 | 929 | 2524 | 0.97 |
| g carbohydrate | 203 | 294 | 406 | 195 | 347 | 473 | 0.10 |
| g carbohydrate from MF | 1 | 36 | 125 | 42 | 91 | 166 | 0.0001† |
| g carbohydrate from NF | 150 | 237 | 363 | 127 | 240 | 369 | 0.52 |
| g sugar/d | 67 | 122 | 243 | 78 | 129 | 227 | 0.69 |
| g sugar from MF | 0 | 36 | 102 | 22 | 53 | 109 | 0.10† |
| % energy from MF from sugar | 0% | 34% | 51% | 20% | 30% | 55% | 0.18 |
| g sugar from NF | 19 | 89 | 170 | 35 | 69 | 153 | 0.94 |
| g fiber | 10 | 17 | 39 | 9 | 18 | 28 | 0.93 |
| g fiber from MF | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0.67 |
| g fiber from NF | 10 | 15 | 24 | 9 | 16 | 28 | 0.64 |
| g fat | 37 | 64 | 92 | 35 | 65 | 102 | 0.62 |
| g fat from MF | 0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 26 | 0.0004 |
| g fat from NF | 31 | 58 | 82 | 23 | 53 | 93 | 0.63 |
| g saturated fat | 8 | 15 | 26 | 10 | 21 | 31 | 0.046 |
| g saturated fat from MF | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 0.005 |
| g saturated fat from NF | 8 | 15 | 25 | 5 | 13 | 28 | 0.85 |
| g trans fat2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 0.66 |
| mg cholesterol2 | 9 | 30 | 118 | 4 | 40 | 136 | 0.76 |
1Nutrient intakes were based on 3-day food records (n = 30). Statistical analysis included ANOVA with effects for treatment, genotype, and treatment-genotype interaction. The p values in this table represent the treatment comparison; 2AA-MF and GMP-MF did not contain trans fat nor cholesterol; †Kruskal–Wallis test was used when data were skewed; AA-MF, amino acid medical food; GMP-MF, glycomacropeptide medical food; MF, medical food; NF, natural food; PE, protein equivalent.
Figure 2Caloric contribution from carbohydrate, sugar, protein, fat, and saturated fat was calculated for the low-Phe diet in combination with AA-MF as a percentage of total energy intake (a). Macronutrient distribution was similar for GMP-MF (data not shown). Caloric contribution from macronutrients was compared to the age-appropriate AMDR (protein, carbohydrate, and fat) or the DGA (sugar and saturated fat) (b) for each participant to determine the percentage of subjects that were below or above the AMDR or DGA (c). Percentage of participants with inadequate and excessive macronutrient distributions were similar for GMP-MF (data not shown). AA-MF, amino acid medical food; AMDR, acceptable macronutrient distribution ranges; DGA, Dietary Guidelines for Americans; GMP-MF, glycomacropeptide medical foods; Sat. fat, saturated fat.
Modified low-protein daily food intake profiles in combination with AA-MF and GMP-MF1.
| Median and percentile nutrient intakes |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MF | GMP-MF | ||||||
| 10th | Median | 90th | 10th | Median | 90th | ||
| Energy, kcal/d | 73 | 211 | 463 | 85 | 257 | 690 | 0.31 |
| Protein, g/d | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.71 |
| Phe, mg/d | 3 | 13 | 60 | 3 | 20 | 93 | 0.32 |
| Carbohydrate, g/d | 17 | 51 | 103 | 14 | 62 | 125 | 0.49‡ |
| Fiber, g/d | 0 | 0.3 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0.13 |
| Fat, g/d | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0.5 | 3 | 18 | 0.13‡ |
| Saturated fat, g/d | 0 | 0.2 | 2 | 0 | 0.5 | 4 | 0.25‡ |
1Nutrient intakes from MLPF were based on 3-day food records (n = 13; classical PKU, n = 10; variant PKU, n = 3). Participants that did not consume MLPF at the end of both treatments were removed from the analysis. MLPF were defined as foods modified to be low in protein and specifically made for individuals with disorders that have dietary protein restrictions. Statistical analysis included ANOVA with effects for treatment, genotype, and treatment-genotype interaction. The p values in this table represent the treatment comparison. There were no significant differences due to genotype or the treatment-genotype interaction (data not shown); ‡Kruskal–Wallis test was used when data were skewed; MLPF, modified low-protein foods.
Treatment comparison of vitamin and additive nutrient intake distributions in comparison with reference intake cutoffs with AA-MF and GMP-MF1.
| Vitamins | AA-MF | GMP-MF |
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Percentile nutrient intakes | Inadequate and excessive intakes2 | Percentile nutrient intakes | Inadequate and excessive intakes | ||||||||
| 10th | Median | 90th | <EAR or AI | >UL | 10th | Median | 90th | <EAR or AI | >UL | |||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Vitamin A, IU | 30 | 3454 | 6996 | 17,572 | 0% | — | 2479 | 8089 | 16,320 | 3% | — | 0.39 |
| Vitamin A from MF | 30 | 0 | 2642 | 4037 | — | 0% | 0 | 2246 | 4008 | — | 0% | 0.15 |
| Vitamin A from MF3 | 21 | 1543 | 2840 | 4063 | — | — | 1348 | 2295 | 4043 | — | — | 0.60 |
| Vitamin A from NF4 | 30 | 1656 | 5061 | 14,604 | 7% | — | 983 | 5232 | 13,795 | 10% | — | 0.99 |
| Vitamin D, IU | 30 | 148 | 562 | 1941 | 33% | 3% | 36 | 511 | 1243 | 33% | 3% | 0.58† |
| Vitamin D from MF | 30 | 0 | 396 | 960 | — | — | 0 | 485 | 868 | — | — | 0.99† |
| Vitamin D from MF | 24 | 234 | 599 | 960 | — | — | 0 | 500 | 929 | — | — | 0.50† |
| Vitamin D from NF | 30 | 2 | 27 | 644 | 90% | — | 3 | 30 | 159 | 93% | — | 1.00 |
| Vitamin E, IU | 30 | 13 | 29 | 55 | 13% | — | 7 | 25 | 37 | 23% | — | 0.002 |
| Vitamin E from MF | 30 | 0 | 18 | 28 | — | 0% | 0 | 15 | 23 | — | 0% | 0.14† |
| Vitamin E from MF | 21 | 13 | 18 | 27 | — | — | 8 | 15 | 25 | — | — | 0.01 |
| Vitamin E from NF | 30 | 6 | 10 | 38 | 80% | — | 4 | 10 | 20 | 87% | — | 0.16† |
| Vitamin K, µg | 30 | 119 | 160 | 412 | 3% | ND5 | 59 | 190 | 393 | 23% | ND | 0.27 |
| Vitamin K from MF | 30 | 0 | 75 | 112 | — | — | 0 | 74 | 131 | — | — | 0.91† |
| Vitamin K from MF | 21 | 55 | 75 | 109 | — | — | 42 | 75 | 134 | — | — | 0.75 |
| Vitamin K from NF | 30 | 29 | 103 | 311 | 47% | — | 20 | 102 | 308 | 53% | — | 0.39 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Vitamin C, mg | 30 | 78 | 161 | 276 | 3% | 0% | 45 | 164 | 296 | 13% | 0% | 0.86 |
| Vitamin C from MF | 30 | 0 | 61 | 130 | — | — | 0 | 74 | 129 | — | — | 0.46† |
| Vitamin C from MF | 21 | 42 | 62 | 133 | — | — | 44 | 81 | 131 | — | — | 0.19 |
| Vitamin C from NF | 30 | 19 | 94 | 212 | 37% | — | 27 | 72 | 197 | 43% | — | 0.62 |
| Thiamin, mg | 30 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 6.5 | 3% | ND | 0.9 | 2.0 | 2.7 | 13% | ND | 0.03† |
| Thiamin from MF | 30 | 0 | 1.3 | 3.9 | — | — | 0 | 1.0 | 1.7 | — | — | 0.01 |
| Thiamin from MF | 21 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 3.7 | — | — | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.8 | — | — | 0.02 |
| Thiamin from NF | 30 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 33% | — | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 63% | — | 0.15† |
| Riboflavin, mg | 30 | 1.0 | 2.6 | 4.0 | 10% | ND | 1.8 | 2.9 | 4.7 | 0% | ND | 0.33† |
| Riboflavin from MF | 30 | 0 | 1.5 | 2.8 | — | — | 1.1 | 1.8 | 2.9 | — | — | 0.12 |
| Riboflavin from MF | 25 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 2.9 | — | — | 1.0 | 1.7 | 2.8 | — | — | 0.41 |
| Riboflavin from NF | 30 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 47% | — | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 63% | — | 0.31† |
| Niacin, mg | 30 | 16 | 31 | 65 | 3% | — | 16 | 32 | 42 | 3% | — | 0.87† |
| Niacin from MF | 30 | 0 | 16 | 55 | — | 20% | 7 | 18 | 26 | — | 0% | 0.52† |
| Niacin from MF | 25 | 5 | 21 | 57 | — | — | 7 | 18 | 27 | — | — | 0.68† |
| Niacin from NF | 30 | 7 | 13 | 26 | 37% | — | 6 | 12 | 25 | 43% | — | 0.19 |
| Vitamin B-6, mg | 30 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 5.7 | 3% | 0% | 1.8 | 3.1 | 5.7 | 0% | 0% | 0.65† |
| Vitamin B-6 from MF | 30 | 0 | 1.7 | 2.8 | — | — | 1.1 | 1.8 | 2.9 | — | — | 0.28 |
| Vitamin B-6 from MF | 25 | 1 | 1.7 | 2.9 | — | — | 1.1 | 1.8 | 2.9 | — | — | 0.62 |
| Vitamin B-6 from NF | 30 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 27% | — | 0.5 | 1.2 | 4.3 | 37% | — | 0.34† |
| Folate DFE, µg | 30 | 504 | 1159 | 1902 | 3% | — | 593 | 1193 | 1461 | 3% | — | 0.58† |
| Folate DFE from MF | 30 | 0 | 743 | 1507 | — | 37% | 192 | 733 | 1126 | — | 27% | 0.80† |
| Folate DFE from MF | 24 | 382 | 851 | 1512 | — | — | 457 | 800 | 1141 | — | — | 0.06 |
| Folate DFE from NF | 30 | 160 | 347 | 847 | 40% | — | 116 | 364 | 790 | 43% | — | 0.35 |
| Vitamin B-12, mg | 30 | 2.3 | 6.5 | 11.8 | 10% | ND | 4.1 | 7.1 | 13.9 | 0% | ND | 0.23† |
| Vitamin B-12 from MF | 30 | 0 | 5.1 | 6.8 | — | — | 2.4 | 4.8 | 9.4 | — | — | 0.14 |
| Vitamin B-12 from MF | 25 | 2.2 | 5.4 | 7.0 | — | — | 2.4 | 4.5 | 10.8 | — | — | 0.71 |
| Vitamin B-12 from NF | 30 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 8.1 | 53% | — | 0.2 | 1.1 | 8.7 | 63% | — | 0.71† |
| Choline, mg | 30 | 74 | 311 | 674 | 63% | 0% | 71 | 512 | 868 | 40% | 0% | 0.02 |
| Choline from MF | 30 | 0 | 277 | 628 | — | — | 0 | 430 | 780 | — | — | 0.03 |
| Choline from MF | 21 | 111 | 414 | 588 | — | — | 253 | 501 | 806 | — | — | 0.003 |
| Choline from NF | 30 | 25 | 65 | 109 | 100% | — | 36 | 63 | 172 | 100% | — | 0.15 |
| Pantothenate, mg | 30 | 4 | 9 | 15 | 17% | ND | 6 | 10 | 16 | 7% | ND | 0.47† |
| Pantothenate from MF | 30 | 0 | 5 | 13 | — | — | 4 | 7 | 11 | — | — | 0.21 |
| Pantothenate from MF | 25 | 3 | 5 | 13 | — | — | 4 | 7 | 12 | — | — | 0.96 |
| Pantothenate from NF | 30 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 83% | — | 1 | 2 | 4 | 93% | — | 0.38† |
| Biotin, mg | 30 | 18 | 67 | 242 | 23% | ND | 27 | 104 | 428 | 13% | ND | 0.14 |
| Biotin from MF | 30 | 0 | 42 | 160 | — | — | 23 | 67 | 359 | — | — | 0.06 |
| Biotin from MF | 25 | 20 | 97 | 160 | — | — | 22 | 54 | 403 | — | — | 0.69 |
| Biotin from NF | 30 | 2 | 6 | 126 | 83% | — | 1 | 4 | 13 | 93% | — | 0.32† |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Carnitine from MF, g | 30 | 0.030 | 0.057 | 0.100 | — | — | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | — | — | <0.0001† |
| Taurine from MF, g | 30 | 0.065 | 0.130 | 0.300 | — | — | 0.085 | 0.160 | 0.258 | — | — | 0.27 |
| Inositol from MF, g | 30 | 0 | 0.080 | 0.135 | — | — | 0 | 0.005 | 0.048 | — | — | <0.0001† |
1Nutrient intakes were based on 3-day food records (n = 30); statistical analysis included ANOVA with effects for treatment, genotype (classical or variant PKU), and treatment-genotype interaction. The p values in this table represent the treatment comparison; 2inadequate and excessive intakes are expressed as a percentage of 30 subjects. United States' Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) cutoffs, based on the AMDR, EAR, AI, and UL, were compared to nutrient intakes per the sex and age of each individual subject [25, 26]. The United States Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015–2020 reference cutoffs were used to evaluate dietary saturated fat and sugar intake of subjects [24]; 3subanalyses for micronutrient intakes from medical foods were conducted due to the high rates of use of AA-MF that lacked micronutrient supplementation. These subanalyses aimed to compare micronutrient intakes from medical foods that were supplemented with micronutrients. Due to the diverse micronutrient supplementation profiles of medical foods, sample sizes for each micronutrient vary; 4natural foods were defined as all foods and beverages that were not medical foods intended for the treatment of PKU; 5per the DRI, a UL for select nutrients has not been determined due to a lack of scientific evidence; †Kruskal–Wallis test was used when data were skewed; AMDR, acceptable macronutrient distribution range; AI, adequate intake; AA-MF, amino acid medical food; DFE, dietary folate equivalents; DGA, Dietary Guidelines for Americans; EAR, estimated average requirement; GMP-MF, glycomacropeptide medical food; MF, medical food; ND, not determined; NF, natural food; PKU, phenylketonuria; UL, upper tolerable intake levels.
Treatment comparison of mineral intake distributions in comparison with reference intake cutoffs with AA-MF and GMP-MF1.
| Minerals | AA-MF | GMP-MF |
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Percentile nutrient intakes | Inadequate and excessive intakes2 | Percentile nutrient intakes | Inadequate and excessive intakes | ||||||||
| 10th | Median | 90th | <EAR or AI | >UL | 10th | Median | 90th | <EAR or AI | >UL | |||
| Calcium, mg | 30 | 839 | 1468 | 2402 | 10% | 0% | 586 | 1529 | 2453 | 20% | 7% | 1.00† |
| Calcium from MF | 30 | 106 | 1103 | 2077 | — | — | 63 | 1153 | 2225 | — | — | 0.99 |
| Calcium from MF3 | 27 | 552 | 1151 | 2129 | — | — | 60 | 1255 | 2391 | — | — | 0.62† |
| Calcium from NF4 | 30 | 183 | 313 | 784 | 93% | — | 156 | 401 | 726 | 90% | — | 0.80† |
| Copper, µg | 30 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 4.2 | 3% | 7% | 0.6 | 1.5 | 2.7 | 13% | 0% | 0.0006† |
| Copper from MF | 30 | 0 | 1.2 | 3.0 | — | — | 0 | 0.6 | 1.1 | — | — | 0.005 |
| Copper from MF | 21 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 2.8 | — | — | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.1 | — | — | 0.0001 |
| Copper from NF | 30 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 33% | — | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 40% | — | 0.27† |
| Iodine, µg | 30 | 13 | 140 | 235 | 23% | 0% | 12 | 153 | 262 | 33% | 0% | 0.66† |
| Iodine from MF | 30 | 0 | 132 | 223 | — | — | 0 | 141 | 239 | — | — | 0.48† |
| Iodine from MF | 21 | 77 | 137 | 223 | — | — | 78 | 149 | 241 | — | — | 0.32 |
| Iodine from NF | 30 | 2 | 9 | 42 | 93% | — | 0 | 8 | 48 | 97% | — | 0.26 |
| Iron, mg | 30 | 14 | 25 | 43 | 0% | 3% | 9 | 23 | 31 | 3% | 0% | 0.02 |
| Iron from MF | 30 | 0 | 15 | 31 | — | — | 0 | 14 | 23 | — | — | 0.14† |
| Iron from MF | 21 | 10 | 16 | 31 | — | — | 8 | 14 | 23 | — | — | 0.02 |
| Iron from NF | 30 | 5 | 8 | 22 | 37% | — | 4 | 8 | 17 | 33% | — | 0.15 |
| Magnesium, mg | 30 | 281 | 501 | 746 | 13% | — | 196 | 514 | 782 | 23% | — | 0.78† |
| Magnesium from MF | 30 | 32 | 320 | 570 | — | 37% | 41 | 353 | 578 | — | 53% | 0.77† |
| Magnesium from MF | 27 | 126 | 321 | 570 | — | — | 38 | 354 | 600 | — | — | 0.80† |
| Magnesium from NF | 30 | 110 | 171 | 320 | 90% | — | 77 | 165 | 292 | 87% | — | 0.41 |
| Manganese, mg | 30 | 1.9 | 3.9 | 7.1 | 10% | 0% | 1.8 | 3.8 | 5.3 | 13% | 3% | 0.26 |
| Manganese from MF | 30 | 0 | 1.6 | 3.4 | — | — | 0 | 1.6 | 3.0 | — | — | 0.84† |
| Manganese from MF | 21 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 3.4 | — | — | 0.6 | 1.9 | 3.1 | — | — | 0.41† |
| Manganese from NF | 30 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 6.3 | 40% | — | 0.9 | 1.9 | 3.7 | 50% | — | 0.10 |
| Phosphorus, mg | 30 | 952 | 1616 | 2431 | 7% | 0% | 774 | 1536 | 2204 | 10% | 0% | 0.60 |
| Phosphorus from MF | 30 | 81 | 972 | 2036 | — | — | 253 | 965 | 1708 | — | — | 0.71† |
| Phosphorus from MF | 27 | 531 | 1032 | 2047 | — | — | 240 | 984 | 1800 | — | — | 0.26 |
| Phosphorus from NF | 30 | 329 | 526 | 1007 | 73% | — | 259 | 538 | 1064 | 67% | — | 0.80 |
| Potassium, mg | 30 | 1809 | 2810 | 4179 | 93% | ND5 | 2014 | 3350 | 4540 | 93% | ND | 0.15 |
| Potassium from MF | 30 | 0 | 600 | 2558 | — | — | 718 | 1146 | 1781 | — | — | 0.08† |
| Potassium from MF | 25 | 60 | 880 | 2673 | — | — | 680 | 1120 | 1815 | — | — | 0.46† |
| Potassium from NF | 30 | 938 | 1910 | 3011 | 97% | — | 1077 | 1867 | 3204 | 100% | — | 1.00† |
| Selenium, µg | 30 | 54 | 93 | 133 | 7% | 0% | 25 | 88 | 142 | 17% | 0% | 0.50† |
| Selenium from MF | 30 | 9 | 58 | 89 | — | — | 0 | 55 | 89 | — | — | 0.34† |
| Selenium from MF | 23 | 26 | 59 | 89 | — | — | 29 | 60 | 93 | — | — | 0.31 |
| Selenium from NF | 30 | 12 | 29 | 88 | 83% | — | 8 | 27 | 103 | 73% | — | 0.95 |
| Sodium, mg | 30 | 1816 | 2637 | 3879 | 7% | 63% | 2052 | 3261 | 4645 | 7% | 83% | 0.048 |
| Sodium from MF | 30 | 0 | 413 | 1175 | — | — | 580 | 1140 | 2040 | — | — | <0.0001† |
| Sodium from MF | 25 | 17 | 583 | 1198 | — | — | 480 | 1123 | 2280 | — | — | 0.0003 |
| Sodium from NF | 30 | 1363 | 2206 | 3138 | 17% | — | 1007 | 2041 | 3383 | 23% | — | 0.69 |
| Zinc, mg | 30 | 5 | 16 | 41 | 13% | 13% | 5 | 13 | 31 | 20% | 10% | 0.12 |
| Zinc from MF | 30 | 0 | 12 | 30 | — | — | 0 | 9 | 17 | — | — | 0.05 |
| Zinc from MF | 21 | 6 | 12 | 28 | — | — | 6 | 10 | 17 | — | — | 0.14† |
| Zinc from NF | 30 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 77% | — | 2 | 4 | 19 | 83% | — | 0.64† |
1Nutrient intakes were based on 3-day food records (n = 30); statistical analysis included ANOVA with effects for treatment, genotype (classical or variant PKU), and treatment-genotype interaction. The p values in this table represent the treatment comparison; 2United States' Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) cutoffs, based on the AMDR, EAR, AI, and UL, were compared to nutrient intakes per the sex and age of each individual subject [25, 26]; 3sub-analyses for micronutrient intakes from medical foods were conducted due to the high rates of use of AA-MF that lacked micronutrient mineral supplementation. These subanalyses aimed to compare micronutrient intakes from medical foods that were supplemented with micronutrients. Due to the diverse micronutrient supplementation profiles of medical foods, sample sizes for each micronutrient vary; 4natural foods were defined as all foods and beverages that were not medical foods intended for the treatment of PKU; 5per the DRI, a UL for select nutrients has not been determined due to a lack of scientific evidence; †Kruskal–Wallis test was used when data were skewed; AMDR, acceptable macronutrient distribution range; AI, adequate intake; AA-MF, amino acid medical food; DFE, dietary folate equivalents; DGA, Dietary Guidelines for Americans; EAR, estimated average requirement; GMP-MF, glycomacropeptide medical food; MF, medical food; ND, not determined; NF, natural food; PKU, phenylketonuria; UL, upper tolerable intake levels.
Figure 3Urine metabolomics of sulfur-containing amino acid (Met and Cys) metabolism, n = 9. Values are means ± SE. Participants with PKU consumed significantly more Met and Cys from medical foods with AA-MF compared to GMP-MF, n = 8 (means ± SE; Met, g/d: AA-MF, 1.3 ± 0.2, versus GMP-MF, 0.9 ± 0.1, p=0.047; Cys, g/d: AA-MF, 2.5 ± 0.3, versus GMP-MF, 0.3 ± 0.007, p < 0.0001). Participants had higher urinary excretion of taurine and taurine-related metabolites (hypotaurine, cysteine sulfonate, cysteine, and cystathionine), possibly related to higher intakes of sulfur-containing amino acids and increased need to excrete sulfur. AA-MF, amino acid medical foods; GMP-MF, glycomacropeptide medical foods.
Main study conclusions.
| (1) | Similar total dietary intakes of most micronutrients when participants consumed AA-MF or Glytactin GMP-MF and no differences in intakes of micronutrients from natural foods were observed. Thus, differences in micronutrient intakes were driven by the diverse micronutrient supplementation profiles of the medical foods. |
|
| |
| (2) | Participants obtained adequate intakes (≥EAR) of most micronutrients. However, inadequate intakes (i.e., <EAR) of potassium for 93% of participants and choline for >40% of participants were observed. |
|
| |
| (3) | Participants had excessive intakes (>UL) of chemically derived folic acid and magnesium from medical foods, and >63% of participants had excessive intakes of sodium driven by natural (likely processed) food intake. Average sugar intake as a percentage of energy was 27% and was excessive (>DGA) for 97% of participants. |
|
| |
| (4) | Without micronutrient supplementation of medical foods, >70% of participants would have inadequate intakes (≤EAR) for 11 micronutrients (biotin, choline, pantothenate, vitamins D and E, potassium, calcium, iodine, magnesium, selenium, and zinc). Greater than 90% of participants would obtain adequate intake (≥EAR) of vitamin A from natural foods alone due to high intakes of provitamin A carotenoids from green leafy vegetables, squashes, carrots, and tomatoes. |
|
| |
| (5) | Of 30 participants, only 13 consumed MLPF with both AA-MF and GMP-MF treatments. MPLF comprised approximately 10% of median calories. |
|
| |
| (6) | Increased urinary excretion of sulfate, taurine, and taurine-related metabolites with AA-MF may be related to increased need to excrete sulfur with higher dietary intake of sulfur-containing amino acids, Met and Cys, from AA-MF compared with Glytactin GMP-MF. |