Literature DB >> 29463755

Crop intensification, land use, and on-farm energy-use efficiency during the worldwide spread of the green revolution.

Pedro Pellegrini1, Roberto J Fernández2.   

Abstract

We analyzed crop production, physical inputs, and land use at the country level to assess technological changes behind the threefold increase in global crop production from 1961 to 2014. We translated machinery, fuel, and fertilizer to embedded energy units that, when summed up, provided a measure of agricultural intensification (human subsidy per hectare) for crops in the 58 countries responsible for 95% of global production. Worldwide, there was a 137% increase in input use per hectare, reaching 13 EJ, or 2.6% of the world's primary energy supply, versus only a 10% increase in land use. Intensification was marked in Asia and Latin America, where input-use levels reached those that North America and Europe had in the earlier years of the period; the increase was more accentuated, irrespective of continent, for the 12 countries with mostly irrigated production. Half of the countries (28/58), mainly developed ones, had an average subsidy >5 GJ/ha/y (with fertilizers accounting for 27% in 1961 and 45% in 2014), with most of them (23/28) using about the same area or less than in 1961 (net land sparing of 31 Mha). Most of the remaining countries (24/30 with inputs <5 GJ/ha/y), mainly developing ones, increased their cropped area (net land extensification of 135 Mha). Overall, energy-use efficiency (crop output/inputs) followed a U-shaped trajectory starting at about 3 and finishing close to 4. The prospects of a more sustainable intensification are discussed, and the inadequacy of the land-sparing model expectation of protecting wilderness via intensified agriculture is highlighted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EROI; Jevons paradox; land sharing; land sparing; water–energy–food security nexus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29463755      PMCID: PMC5877987          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1717072115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  12 in total

1.  Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture.

Authors:  David Tilman; Christian Balzer; Jason Hill; Belinda L Befort
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Food production and the energy crisis.

Authors:  D Pimentel; L E Hurd; A C Bellotti; M J Forster; I N Oka; O D Sholes; R J Whitman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-11-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Agriculture. Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development.

Authors:  P M Vitousek; R Naylor; T Crews; M B David; L E Drinkwater; E Holland; P J Johnes; J Katzenberger; L A Martinelli; P A Matson; G Nziguheba; D Ojima; C A Palm; G P Robertson; P A Sanchez; A R Townsend; F S Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  African Green Revolution needn't be a mirage.

Authors:  Gebisa Ejeta
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Green Revolution research saved an estimated 18 to 27 million hectares from being brought into agricultural production.

Authors:  James R Stevenson; Nelson Villoria; Derek Byerlee; Timothy Kelley; Mywish Maredia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment.

Authors:  Tim Newbold; Lawrence N Hudson; Andrew P Arnell; Sara Contu; Adriana De Palma; Simon Ferrier; Samantha L L Hill; Andrew J Hoskins; Igor Lysenko; Helen R P Phillips; Victoria J Burton; Charlotte W T Chng; Susan Emerson; Di Gao; Gwilym Pask-Hale; Jon Hutton; Martin Jung; Katia Sanchez-Ortiz; Benno I Simmons; Sarah Whitmee; Hanbin Zhang; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Energy use in the U.S. food system.

Authors:  J S Steinhart; C E Steinhart
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-04-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Researchers must be aware of their roles at the interface of ecosystem services science and policy.

Authors:  Emilie Crouzat; Isabelle Arpin; Lucas Brunet; Matthew J Colloff; Francis Turkelboom; Sandra Lavorel
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.129

9.  Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970-2005.

Authors:  Thomas K Rudel; Laura Schneider; Maria Uriarte; B L Turner; Ruth DeFries; Deborah Lawrence; Jacqueline Geoghegan; Susanna Hecht; Amy Ickowitz; Eric F Lambin; Trevor Birkenholtz; Sandra Baptista; Ricardo Grau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Energy and the food system.

Authors:  Jeremy Woods; Adrian Williams; John K Hughes; Mairi Black; Richard Murphy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  A systems approach to assessing environmental and economic effects of food loss and waste interventions in the United States.

Authors:  Mary K Muth; Catherine Birney; Amanda Cuéllar; Steven M Finn; Mark Freeman; James N Galloway; Isabella Gee; Jessica Gephart; Kristal Jones; Linda Low; Ellen Meyer; Quentin Read; Travis Smith; Keith Weitz; Sarah Zoubek
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Landscape context affects the sustainability of organic farming systems.

Authors:  Olivia M Smith; Abigail L Cohen; John P Reganold; Matthew S Jones; Robert J Orpet; Joseph M Taylor; Jessa H Thurman; Kevin A Cornell; Rachel L Olsson; Yang Ge; Christina M Kennedy; David W Crowder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nuclear-encoded synthesis of the D1 subunit of photosystem II increases photosynthetic efficiency and crop yield.

Authors:  Juan-Hua Chen; Si-Ting Chen; Ning-Yu He; Qing-Long Wang; Yao Zhao; Wei Gao; Fang-Qing Guo
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 15.793

4.  Key determinants of global land-use projections.

Authors:  Elke Stehfest; Willem-Jan van Zeist; Hugo Valin; Petr Havlik; Alexander Popp; Page Kyle; Andrzej Tabeau; Daniel Mason-D'Croz; Tomoko Hasegawa; Benjamin L Bodirsky; Katherine Calvin; Jonathan C Doelman; Shinichiro Fujimori; Florian Humpenöder; Hermann Lotze-Campen; Hans van Meijl; Keith Wiebe
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Energy implications of the 21st century agrarian transition.

Authors:  Lorenzo Rosa; Maria Cristina Rulli; Saleem Ali; Davide Danilo Chiarelli; Jampel Dell'Angelo; Nathaniel D Mueller; Arnim Scheidel; Giuseppina Siciliano; Paolo D'Odorico
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Distinguishing anthropogenic and natural contributions to coproduction of national crop yields globally.

Authors:  Matthias Schröter; Lukas Egli; Lilith Brüning; Ralf Seppelt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  At the core of the socio-ecological transition: Agroecosystem energy fluxes in Austria 1830-2010.

Authors:  Simone Gingrich; Fridolin Krausmann
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 8.  Conceptualizing a Sustainable Food System in an Automated World: Toward a "Eudaimonian" Future.

Authors:  Alon Shepon; Patrik John Gustav Henriksson; Tong Wu
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-11-05

9.  The health, environmental, and economic dimensions of future dietary transitions in Argentina.

Authors:  Ezequiel M Arrieta; Carlos González Fischer; Sebastian Aguiar; Milva Geri; Roberto J Fernández; Julia Becaria Coquet; Carlos M Scavuzzo; Andres Rieznik; Alberto León; Alejandro D González; Esteban G Jobbágy
Journal:  Sustain Sci       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 7.196

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.