| Literature DB >> 29463275 |
Sören Verstraete1, Ilse Vanhorebeek1, Esther van Puffelen2, Inge Derese1, Catherine Ingels1, Sascha C Verbruggen2, Pieter J Wouters1, Koen F Joosten2, Jan Hanot1, Gonzalo G Guerra3, Dirk Vlasselaers1, Jue Lin4, Greet Van den Berghe5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children who have suffered from critical illnesses that required treatment in a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) have long-term physical and neurodevelopmental impairments. The mechanisms underlying this legacy remain largely unknown. In patients suffering from chronic diseases hallmarked by inflammation and oxidative stress, poor long-term outcome has been associated with shorter telomeres. Shortened telomeres have also been reported to result from excessive food consumption and/or unhealthy nutrition. We investigated whether critically ill children admitted to the PICU have shorter-than-normal telomeres, and whether early parenteral nutrition (PN) independently affects telomere length when adjusting for known determinants of telomere length.Entities:
Keywords: Children; Critical care; Critical illness; Intensive care; Nutrition; PICU; Paediatric; Telomere length; Telomeres
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29463275 PMCID: PMC5820800 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-018-1972-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care ISSN: 1364-8535 Impact factor: 9.097
Fig. 1Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram of the study participants
Demographics
| Total population | Subgroup with neutrophil count available | Matched subgroupsa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline characteristics | PICU patients | PICU patients | PICU patients | Healthy children |
| Male sex, | 640 (55.7) | 355 (55.1) | 180 (55.2) | 179 (54.9) |
| Age (years) | 1.8 (0.3–7.4) | 1.6 (0.3–5.9) | 4.5 (1.7–8.7) | 4.5 (1.8–7.8) |
| Age <1 year, | 476 (41.5) | 276 (42.9) | 51 (15.6) | 44 (13.5) |
| Height (%)b | 38.7 (8.5–78.2) | 35.1 (7.8–71.5) | 38.1 (8.5–78.4) | |
| Weight (%)b | 32.5 (8.3–67.8) | 29.8 (6.5–62.2) | 39.8 (14.8–70.0) | |
| Chronicity, | 882 (76.8) | 532 (82.6) | 242 (74.2) | |
| Randomisation to late PN, | 576 (50.2) | 324 (50.3) | 167 (51.2) | |
| STRONGkids risk level, | ||||
| Medium | 1046 (91.1) | 605 (93.9) | 299 (91.7) | |
| High | 102 (8.9) | 39 (6.1) | 27 (8.3) | |
| PeLOD score first 24 he | 22 (12–32) | 31 (21–32) | 21 (11–31) | |
| PIM2 scoref | −2.7 (−3.6; –1.4) | −3.0 (−3.7; –1.7) | −2.7 (−3.8; –1.5) | |
| PIM2 probability of death (%)g | 6.3 (2.6–19.3) | 5.0 (2.4–15.5) | 6.5 (2.6–22.0) | |
| Emergency admission, | 554 (48.3) | 218 (33.9) | 159 (48.8) | |
| Diagnostic category, | ||||
| Surgical | ||||
| Abdominal | 51 (4.4) | 19 (3.0) | 7 (2.2) | |
| Burns | 8 (0.7) | 1 (0.2) | 4 (1.2) | |
| Cardiac | 517 (45.0) | 377 (58.5) | 128 (39.3) | |
| Neurosurgery-traumatic brain injury | 106 (9.2) | 51 (7.9) | 40 (12.3) | |
| Thoracic | 46 (4.0) | 29 (4.5) | 11 (3.4) | |
| Transplantation | 22 (1.9) | 6 (0.9) | 7 (2.2) | |
| Orthopaedic surgery-trauma | 50 (4.4) | 32 (5.0) | 18 (5.5) | |
| Other | 31 (2.7) | 13 (2.0) | 13 (4.0) | |
| Medical | ||||
| Cardiac | 44 (3.8) | 13 (2.0) | 15 (4.6) | |
| Gastrointestinal-hepatic | 5 (0.4) | 4 (0.6) | 4 (1.2) | |
| Oncologic-hematologic | 11 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (1.5) | |
| Neurologic | 77 (6.7) | 33 (5.1) | 19 (5.8) | |
| Renal | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.3) | |
| Respiratory | 116 (10.1) | 38 (5.9) | 26 (8.0) | |
| Other | 63 (5.5) | 28 (4.3) | 28 (8.6) | |
| Condition on admission | ||||
| Mechanical ventilation required, | 1033 (90.0) | 580 (90.1) | 286 (87.7) | |
| ECMO or other assist device, required, | 40 (3.5) | 14 (2.2) | 9 (2.8) | |
| Infection, | 415 (36.1) | 173 (26.9) | 116 (35.6) | |
Data are expressed as number (%) or median (IQR)
STRONGkids Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, PeLOD Paediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction, PIM2 Paediatric Index of Mortality 2, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, PICU paediatric intensive care unit
aThere were no significant differences in sex, age, and number of infants between matched subgroups of patients and controls
bHeight and weight, expressed as percentiles of population norms, were calculated with the anthropometric calculators for normal children, based on the World Health Organisation Growth Charts for Canada (version 2015/02/24), and for children with syndromes known to affect height and weight (version 2014/09/25). Patients and healthy children were not matched for height and weight, as a growth delay is expected in critically ill children
cDichotomizing label indicating whether or not the patient was suffering from any symptomatic chronic disease identified through screening of the patient’s medical history and hospital files
dScores on the STRONGkids range from 0 to 5, with a score of 0 indicating a low risk of malnutrition, a score of 1–3 indicating medium risk, and a score of 4–5 indicating high risk
ePeLOD scores range from 0 to 71, with higher scores indicating more severe illness
fPIM2 scores, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of mortality
gPIM2 probability of death, ranging from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating a higher probability of death in PICU
Fig. 2Daily caloric intake of patients in the early parental nutrition (PN) and late PN groups. The total caloric intake per day of patients in the early and late PN groups was calculated for the first week in the paediatric ICU (PICU) for the total number of patients for whom leukocyte telomere length was determined (N = 1148) (a), and for the subset of patients for whom neutrophil counts were available (N = 644) (b), with N indicating the number of patients for whom these data were available. Data are presented as mean and standard error of the mean (SEM). d, day; kcal, kilocalories
Fig. 3Illustration of the impact of the randomised nutritional management on the change in leukocyte telomere length. Differences were calculated between telomere length on the last day in the paediatric ICU (PICU) and that upon admission to the PICU (a), and between neutrophil fraction on the last day in PICU and that upon admission to the PICU (b), and the impact of the randomised intervention on these changes was calculated in univariate analysis. Data are presented as mean and standard error of the mean (SEM). Adjusted estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the telomere-shortening effect of early versus late PN (c). PN, parenteral nutrition; T/S, telomere/single-copy-gene ratio
Multivariable linear regression analyses determining significant and independent associations between risk factors and the change in leukocyte telomere length from admission to the last day in PICU
| A | B | C | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Estimate (95% CI) for change in telomere length expressed as T/S units, adjusted for risk factors | Estimate (95% CI) for change in telomere length expressed as T/S units, adjusted for risk factors, including duration of PICU stay | Estimate (95% CI) for change in telomere length expressed as T/S units, adjusted for risk factors, including cumulative dose of insulin and acquisition of new infection during PICU stay | |||
| Randomisation to early vs. late initiation of PN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Change in fraction of neutrophils from admission to the last day (per % added)a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age (per year added) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Male vs. female sex |
|
| −0.016 (−0.033; 0.001) | 0.06 |
|
|
| Leukocyte telomere length upon admission (per T/S unit added) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Diagnostic category (as compared with all other categories) | ||||||
| Surgical | ||||||
| Abdominal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cardiac | −0.012 (−0.059; 0.036) | 0.63 | −0.016 (−0.065; 0.032) | 0.50 | −0.009 (−0.057; 0.039) | 0.71 |
| Neurosurgery-traumatic brain injury | −0.025 (−0.092; 0.042) | 0.45 | −0.021 (−0.088; 0.046) | 0.54 | −0.023 (−0.090; 0.045) | 0.51 |
| Thoracic | 0.008 (−0.073; 0.088) | 0.85 | 0.007 (−0.073; 0.087) | 0.86 | 0.004 (−0.077; 0.084) | 0.93 |
| Transplantation | −0.051 (−0.211; 0.109) | 0.53 | −0.060 (−0.220; 0.100) | 0.45 | −0.055 (−0.215; 0.105) | 0.49 |
| Orthopaedic surgery-trauma | 0.022 (−0.062; 0.106) | 0.60 | 0.026 (−0.058; 0.109) | 0.54 | 0.029 (−0.055; 0.113) | 0.50 |
| Other | 0.091 (−0.019; 0.202) | 0.10 | 0.090 (−0.020; 0.201) | 0.10 | 0.094 (−0.016; 0.205) | 0.09 |
| Medical | ||||||
| Cardiac | −0.048 (−0.185; 0.089) | 0.49 | −0.050 (−0.187; 0.087) | 0.47 | −0.040 (−0.178; 0.097) | 0.56 |
| Gastrointestinal-hepatic | −0.091 (−0.294; 0.112) | 0.37 | −0.098 (−0.300; 0.104) | 0.34 | −0.088 (−0.291; 0.114) | 0.39 |
| Neurologic | −0.012 (−0.091; 0.067) | 0.76 | −0.016 (−0.095; 0.063) | 0.69 | −0.017 (−0.096; 0.063) | 0.67 |
| Respiratory | −0.014 (−0.113; 0.085) | 0.78 | −0.011 (−0.110; 0.088) | 0.82 | −0.024 (−0.123; 0.076) | 0.64 |
| Other | −0.006 (−0.116; 0.105) | 0.91 | 0.015 (−0.097; 0.127) | 0.79 | −0.006 (−0.116; 0.105) | 0.92 |
| PeLOD score first 24 h (per point added)b | −0.020 (−0.069; 0.028) | 0.40 | −0.015 (−0.064; 0.034) | 0.54 | −0.019 (−0.068; 0.030) | 0.44 |
| PIM2 score (per point added)c,d | 0.031 (−0.048; 0.111) | 0.44 | 0.048 (−0.033; 0.128) | 0.24 | 0.038 (−0.043; 0.120) | 0.35 |
| High vs. medium STRONGkids risk levele | −0.015 (−0.052; 0.022) | 0.42 | 0.013 (−0.024; 0.050) | 0.49 | 0.013 (−0.024; 0.051) | 0.47 |
| Infection vs. no infection upon-admission | −0.009 (−0.033; 0.015) | 0.46 | −0.004 (−0.029; 0.021) | 0.74 | −0.004 (−0.029; 0.021) | 0.76 |
| Centre (Leuven vs. Rotterdam) | 0.084 (−0.030; 0.198) | 0.14 | 0.090 (−0.024; 0.204) | 0.12 | 0.087 (−0.027; 0.201) | 0.13 |
| Height (per percentile of population norms added)f | 0.006 (−0.029; 0.041) | 0.72 | 0.005 (−0.030; 0.039) | 0.79 | 0.005 (−0.029; 0.040) | 0.76 |
| Weight (per percentile of population norms added)f | 0.005 (−0.032; 0.042) | 0.79 | 0.006 (−0.031; 0.043) | 0.75 | 0.007 (−0.030; 0.044) | 0.72 |
| Chronicity vs. no chronicityg | 0.020 (−0.009; 0.050) | 0.17 | 0.025 (−0.054; 0.005) | 0.09 | 0.021 (−0.008; 0.051) | 0.15 |
| Duration of stay in the PICU (per day added) |
|
| ||||
| Cumulative dose of insulin (per IU/kg added) | −0.091 (−0.198; 0.017) | 0.09 | ||||
| New infection vs. no new infection | 0.024 (−0.012; 0.059) | 0.19 | ||||
Abbreviations: PeLOD Paediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction, PIM2 Paediatric Index of Mortality 2, PICU paediatric ICU, T/S telomere/single-gene-copy ratio, STRONGkids, Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, IU international units
Independent determinants of change in telomere length are indicated in italics
aThe fraction of neutrophils is the percentage neutrophils of the total leukocyte count, ranging from 0 to 100%.
Analyses were performed in 508 patients for whom all variables were available
bPeLOD scores range from 0 to 71, with higher scores indicating more severe illness
cPIM2 scores, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of mortality
dIncluding the PIM2 probabilities of death (ranging from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating a higher probability of death in PICU) instead of the PIM2 scores, did not change any of the results. Per % added, the estimate expressed as T/S units (95% CI) for PIM2 probability of death, was 0.0002 (−0.0005; 0.0009), P = 0.63. In the model adjusted for duration of stay in the PICU, the estimate expressed as T/S units (95% CI) per % PIM2 probability of death added was 0.0003 (−0.0004; 0.001), P = 0.41
eScores on the STRONGkids range from 0 to 5, with a score of 0 indicating a low risk of malnutrition, a score of 1–3 indicating medium risk, and a score of 4–5 indicating high risk
fHeight and weight, expressed as percentiles of population norms, were calculated with the anthropometric calculators for normal children, based on the World Health Organisation Growth Charts for Canada (version 2015/02/24), and for children with syndromes known to affect height and weight (version 2014/09/25)
gDichotomising label indicating whether or not the patient was suffering from any symptomatic chronic disease identified through screening of the patient’s medical history and hospital files