Victoria Horbert1, Long Xin1,2, Peter Foehr3, Olaf Brinkmann4, Matthias Bungartz4, Rainer H Burgkart3, T Graeve5, Raimund W Kinne1. 1. 1 Experimental Rheumatology Unit, Department of Orthopedics, Jena University Hospital, Waldkrankenhaus "Rudolf Elle", Eisenberg, Germany. 2. 2 Department of Orthopedics, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. 3. 3 Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopedics and Sportsorthopedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. 4. 4 Chair of Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedics, Jena University Hospital, Waldkrankenhaus "Rudolf Elle", Eisenberg, Germany. 5. 5 Amedrix GmbH, Esslingen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Limitations of matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation to regenerate functional hyaline cartilage demand a better understanding of the underlying cellular/molecular processes. Thus, the regenerative capacity of a clinically approved hydrogel collagen type I implant was tested in a standardized bovine cartilage punch model. METHODS: Cartilage rings (outer diameter 6 mm; inner defect diameter 2 mm) were prepared from the bovine trochlear groove. Collagen implants (± bovine chondrocytes) were placed inside the cartilage rings and cultured up to 12 weeks. Cartilage-implant constructs were analyzed by histology (hematoxylin/eosin; safranin O), immunohistology (aggrecan, collagens 1 and 2), and for protein content, RNA expression, and implant push-out force. RESULTS: Cartilage-implant constructs revealed vital morphology, preserved matrix integrity throughout culture, progressive, but slight proteoglycan loss from the "host" cartilage or its surface and decreasing proteoglycan release into the culture supernatant. In contrast, collagen 2 and 1 content of cartilage and cartilage-implant interface was approximately constant over time. Cell-free and cell-loaded implants showed (1) cell migration onto/into the implant, (2) progressive deposition of aggrecan and constant levels of collagens 1 and 2, (3) progressively increased mRNA levels for aggrecan and collagen 2, and (4) significantly augmented push-out forces over time. Cell-loaded implants displayed a significantly earlier and more long-lasting deposition of aggrecan, as well as tendentially higher push-out forces. CONCLUSION: Preserved tissue integrity and progressively increasing cartilage differentiation and push-out forces for up to 12 weeks of cultivation suggest initial cartilage regeneration and lateral bonding of the implant in this in vitro model for cartilage replacement materials.
OBJECTIVE: Limitations of matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation to regenerate functional hyaline cartilage demand a better understanding of the underlying cellular/molecular processes. Thus, the regenerative capacity of a clinically approved hydrogel collagen type I implant was tested in a standardized bovinecartilage punch model. METHODS:Cartilage rings (outer diameter 6 mm; inner defect diameter 2 mm) were prepared from the bovine trochlear groove. Collagen implants (± bovine chondrocytes) were placed inside the cartilage rings and cultured up to 12 weeks. Cartilage-implant constructs were analyzed by histology (hematoxylin/eosin; safranin O), immunohistology (aggrecan, collagens 1 and 2), and for protein content, RNA expression, and implant push-out force. RESULTS:Cartilage-implant constructs revealed vital morphology, preserved matrix integrity throughout culture, progressive, but slight proteoglycan loss from the "host" cartilage or its surface and decreasing proteoglycan release into the culture supernatant. In contrast, collagen 2 and 1 content of cartilage and cartilage-implant interface was approximately constant over time. Cell-free and cell-loaded implants showed (1) cell migration onto/into the implant, (2) progressive deposition of aggrecan and constant levels of collagens 1 and 2, (3) progressively increased mRNA levels for aggrecan and collagen 2, and (4) significantly augmented push-out forces over time. Cell-loaded implants displayed a significantly earlier and more long-lasting deposition of aggrecan, as well as tendentially higher push-out forces. CONCLUSION: Preserved tissue integrity and progressively increasing cartilage differentiation and push-out forces for up to 12 weeks of cultivation suggest initial cartilage regeneration and lateral bonding of the implant in this in vitro model for cartilage replacement materials.
Entities:
Keywords:
(immuno)histology; bovine cartilage punch model; collagen type I hydrogel; implant push-out force; matrix-associated cartilage transplantation (MACT)
Authors: John S Theodoropoulos; J N Amritha De Croos; Sam S Park; Robert Pilliar; Rita A Kandel Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Anne E Carpenter; Thouis R Jones; Michael R Lamprecht; Colin Clarke; In Han Kang; Ola Friman; David A Guertin; Joo Han Chang; Robert A Lindquist; Jason Moffat; Polina Golland; David M Sabatini Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Jie Xie; Wu Wang; Ruibo Zhao; Wei Lu; Liang Chen; Weiping Su; Min Zeng; Yihe Hu Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2021-08-18 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Victoria Horbert; Long Xin; Peter Föhr; René Huber; Rainer H Burgkart; Raimund W Kinne Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Lourdes Alcaide-Ruggiero; Verónica Molina-Hernández; María M Granados; Juan M Domínguez Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-12-11 Impact factor: 5.923