Literature DB >> 29461255

Accuracy of radiotherapy dose calculations based on cone-beam CT: comparison of deformable registration and image correction based methods.

T E Marchant1, K D Joshi, C J Moore.   

Abstract

Radiotherapy dose calculations based on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images can be inaccurate due to unreliable Hounsfield units (HU) in the CBCT. Deformable image registration of planning CT images to CBCT, and direct correction of CBCT image values are two methods proposed to allow heterogeneity corrected dose calculations based on CBCT. In this paper we compare the accuracy and robustness of these two approaches. CBCT images for 44 patients were used including pelvis, lung and head & neck sites. CBCT HU were corrected using a 'shading correction' algorithm and via deformable registration of planning CT to CBCT using either Elastix or Niftyreg. Radiotherapy dose distributions were re-calculated with heterogeneity correction based on the corrected CBCT and several relevant dose metrics for target and OAR volumes were calculated. Accuracy of CBCT based dose metrics was determined using an 'override ratio' method where the ratio of the dose metric to that calculated on a bulk-density assigned version of the same image is assumed to be constant for each patient, allowing comparison to the patient's planning CT as a gold standard. Similar performance is achieved by shading corrected CBCT and both deformable registration algorithms, with mean and standard deviation of dose metric error less than 1% for all sites studied. For lung images, use of deformed CT leads to slightly larger standard deviation of dose metric error than shading corrected CBCT with more dose metric errors greater than 2% observed (7% versus 1%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29461255     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aab0f0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Pelvic multi-organ segmentation on cone-beam CT for prostate adaptive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yabo Fu; Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Sibo Tian; Pretesh Patel; Ashesh B Jani; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Technical Note: Density correction to improve CT number mapping in thoracic deformable image registration.

Authors:  Jinzhong Yang; Yongbin Zhang; Zijian Zhang; Lifei Zhang; Peter Balter; Laurence Court
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  An unsupervised 2D-3D deformable registration network (2D3D-RegNet) for cone-beam CT estimation.

Authors:  You Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.174

4.  Trajectory log analysis and cone-beam CT-based daily dose calculation to investigate the dosimetric accuracy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Yohei Utena; Jun Takatsu; Satoru Sugimoto; Keisuke Sasai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-10       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Comparison of an in-house hybrid DIR method to NiftyReg on CBCT and CT images for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Chunling Jiang; Yuling Huang; Shenggou Ding; Xiaochang Gong; Xingxing Yuan; Shaobin Wang; Jingao Li; Yun Zhang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Evaluation of patient organ doses from kilovoltage cone-beam CT imaging in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Alper Özseven; Bahar Dirican
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 7.  Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Chris Beltran; Stefan Both; Lei Dong; Jacob Flanz; Keith Furutani; Clemens Grassberger; David R Grosshans; Antje-Christin Knopf; Johannes A Langendijk; Hakan Nystrom; Katia Parodi; Bas W Raaymakers; Christian Richter; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Marco Schippers; Simona F Shaitelman; B K Kevin Teo; Jan Unkelbach; Patrick Wohlfahrt; Tony Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.174

8.  Probabilistic dose distribution from interfractional motion in carbon ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer shows rectum sparing with moderate target coverage degradation.

Authors:  Daniel Bridges; Hidemasa Kawamura; Tatsuaki Kanai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.