Zhihui Zou1,2, Abai Xu1, Shaobo Zheng1, Binshen Chen1, Yawen Xu1, Hulin Li1, Chongyang Duan3,4, Junhong Zheng5, Jiasheng Chen1, Chaoming Li1, Yiming Wang1,6, Yubo Gao1, Chaozhao Liang2, Chunxiao Liu7. 1. Department of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, 253 Middle Gongye Avenue Road, Guangzhou, 510280, Guangdong, China. 2. Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. 3. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 4. State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, National Clinical Research Centre for Kidney Disease, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 5. Department of Urology, The Second Affiliate Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China. 6. Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany. 7. Department of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, 253 Middle Gongye Avenue Road, Guangzhou, 510280, Guangdong, China. liuchx888@hotmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Bipolar endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (BEEP) was recommended by the 2016 EAU guidelines as the first choice of surgical treatment in men with a substantially enlarged prostate and moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms. The main aim of this study was to compare a modified diode laser enucleation of the prostate (DiLEP) to BEEP. METHODS: A total of 114 patients with prostate (20-160 mL) were randomized 1:1 into either DiLEP or BEEP in a dual-centre, non-inferiority-design randomized-controlled trial. The primary outcomes included Qmax and IPSS at 12 months. Non-inferiority was evaluated by comparing the two-sided 95% CI for the mean differences of Qmax and IPSS. Secondary endpoints included other perioperative parameters, postoperative micturition variables, and complication rate. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients (97%) had completed the intent-to-treat analysis, The results showed that DiLEP was comparable to BEEP regarding Qmax (28.0 ± 7.0 vs. 28.1 ± 7.2 mL/s) and IPSS (3.0 ± 2.2 vs. 2.9 ± 2.6) at 12 months, the non-inferiority was met for both Qmax and IPSS. There were also no significant difference between two groups regarding tissue removal rate (71.8 vs. 73.8%), hemoglobin decrease (0.33 ± 0.66 vs. 0.36 ± 0.75 g/dL), sodium decrease (1.0 ± 2.7 vs. 0.3 ± 2.9 mmol/L), and Clavien III complications (5.3 vs. 1.8%) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: This DiLEP is an anatomical endoscopic enucleation technique for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, it is non-inferior to BEEP regarding Qmax and IPSS at 12 months postoperatively.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Bipolar endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (BEEP) was recommended by the 2016 EAU guidelines as the first choice of surgical treatment in men with a substantially enlarged prostate and moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms. The main aim of this study was to compare a modified diode laser enucleation of the prostate (DiLEP) to BEEP. METHODS: A total of 114 patients with prostate (20-160 mL) were randomized 1:1 into either DiLEP or BEEP in a dual-centre, non-inferiority-design randomized-controlled trial. The primary outcomes included Qmax and IPSS at 12 months. Non-inferiority was evaluated by comparing the two-sided 95% CI for the mean differences of Qmax and IPSS. Secondary endpoints included other perioperative parameters, postoperative micturition variables, and complication rate. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients (97%) had completed the intent-to-treat analysis, The results showed that DiLEP was comparable to BEEP regarding Qmax (28.0 ± 7.0 vs. 28.1 ± 7.2 mL/s) and IPSS (3.0 ± 2.2 vs. 2.9 ± 2.6) at 12 months, the non-inferiority was met for both Qmax and IPSS. There were also no significant difference between two groups regarding tissue removal rate (71.8 vs. 73.8%), hemoglobin decrease (0.33 ± 0.66 vs. 0.36 ± 0.75 g/dL), sodium decrease (1.0 ± 2.7 vs. 0.3 ± 2.9 mmol/L), and Clavien III complications (5.3 vs. 1.8%) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: This DiLEP is an anatomical endoscopic enucleation technique for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, it is non-inferior to BEEP regarding Qmax and IPSS at 12 months postoperatively.
Entities:
Keywords:
Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Diode laser enucleation of the prostate; Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate; Laser surgery; Prostatectomy; Randomized-controlled trial
Authors: Thomas R W Herrmann; Evangelos N Liatsikos; Udo Nagele; Olivier Traxer; Axel S Merseburger Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: N P Roos; J E Wennberg; D J Malenka; E S Fisher; K McPherson; T F Andersen; M M Cohen; E Ramsey Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1989-04-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexander Bachmann; Andrea Tubaro; Neil Barber; Frank d'Ancona; Gordon Muir; Ulrich Witzsch; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Joan Benejam; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Antony Riddick; Sascha Pahernik; Herman Roelink; Filip Ameye; Christian Saussine; Franck Bruyère; Wolfgang Loidl; Tim Larner; Nirjan-Kumar Gogoi; Richard Hindley; Rolf Muschter; Andrew Thorpe; Nitin Shrotri; Stuart Graham; Moritz Hamann; Kurt Miller; Martin Schostak; Carlos Capitán; Helmut Knispel; J Andrew Thomas Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Sascha A Ahyai; Peter Gilling; Steven A Kaplan; Rainer M Kuntz; Stephan Madersbacher; Francesco Montorsi; Mark J Speakman; Christian G Stief Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Thomas R W Herrmann; Stavros Gravas; Jean Jmch de la Rosette; Mathias Wolters; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Ioannis Giannakis Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-05-10 Impact factor: 4.241