Literature DB >> 21944122

Safety and efficacy of Eraser laser enucleation of the prostate: preliminary report.

Lukas Lusuardi1, Andrew Myatt, Manuela Sieberer, Stefan Jeschke, Reinhold Zimmermann, Günter Janetschek.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We ascertained the safety and efficacy of the 1,318 nm diode Eraser laser (Rolle and Rolle, Salzburg, Austria) for transurethral enucleation of the prostate. This laser has been successfully used to resect lung metastasis. It cuts and coagulates vascular rich tissue safely and effectively. We describe a prospective, randomized trial of Eraser laser prostate enucleation vs bipolar transurethral prostate resection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggesting bladder outlet obstruction and a mean prostate size of 59.5 ml on transrectal ultrasound were randomized to Eraser laser prostate enucleation or bipolar transurethral prostate resection. Patients were assessed preoperatively, and 1 and 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Eraser laser prostate enucleation was equivalent to bipolar transurethral prostate resection in improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score, maximal flow rate and quality of life. Laser enucleation was significantly superior to bipolar transurethral resection for measured blood loss (mean ± SD 116.83 ± 97.02 vs 409.83 ± 148.61 ml), catheter time (mean 32.80 ± 8.74 vs 65.73 ± 13.72 hours) and hospital time (mean 45.13 ± 14.77 vs 91.20 ± 11.76 hours, each p <0.05). Using the validated Clavien-Dindo system there were 3 grade Id and 1 grade II complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Eraser laser prostate enucleation and bipolar transurethral prostate resection were equally safe and effective to relieve bladder outflow obstruction and lower urinary tract symptoms. This laser technique has the advantage of less blood loss, and shorter catheter time and hospital stay.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21944122     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  16 in total

1.  BPH: perioperative advantages of laser treatment.

Authors:  Sarah Payton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of large volume prostates: preliminary 6-month safety and efficacy results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  B Becker; T R W Herrmann; A J Gross; C Netsch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Update on the use of diode laser in the management of benign prostate obstruction in 2014.

Authors:  Lukas Lusuardi; Michael Mitterberger; Stephan Hruby; Thomas Kunit; Birgit Kloss; Paul F Engelhardt; Manuela Sieberer; Günter Janetschek
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Laparoscopic adenomectomy versus Eraser laser enucleation of the prostate.

Authors:  L Lusuardi; S Hruby; G Janetschek; M Mitterberger; M Sieberer; D Colleselli; T Kunit; W Hitzl; B Kloss
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  [Surgical treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)].

Authors:  C Gratzke; F Strittmatter; O Reich; A Bachmann; C G Stief; M Seitz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  A prospective, randomized trial comparing thulium vapoenucleation with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction: perioperative safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Christopher Netsch; B Becker; C Tiburtius; C Moritz; A Venneri Becci; T R W Herrmann; A J Gross
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Dual-centre randomized-controlled trial comparing transurethral endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using diode laser vs. bipolar plasmakinetic for the treatment of LUTS secondary of benign prostate obstruction: 1-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Zhihui Zou; Abai Xu; Shaobo Zheng; Binshen Chen; Yawen Xu; Hulin Li; Chongyang Duan; Junhong Zheng; Jiasheng Chen; Chaoming Li; Yiming Wang; Yubo Gao; Chaozhao Liang; Chunxiao Liu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Laser treatment of benign prostate enlargement--which laser for which prostate?

Authors:  Malte Rieken; Alexander Bachmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Larger than 100 ml: Simple Open Enucleation Versus Transurethral Laser Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mohamed A Elkoushy; Mostafa M Elhilali
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  Recent evidence for anatomic endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) in patients with benign prostatic obstruction on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  C Netsch; T R W Herrmann; G Bozzini; L Berti; A J Gross; B Becker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.