| Literature DB >> 29459655 |
K L Connelly1, R Kandane-Rathnayake1, M Huq2, A Hoi1, M Nikpour2, E F Morand3.
Abstract
Type I interferon (IFN) pathways are significant in SLE pathogenesis. Less is known about the utility of measuring markers of IFN activity in patients, or whether patient subsets with different profiles exist. We explored the longitudinal associations of IFN-induced chemokines with disease activity in a cohort of SLE patients. We calculated a validated composite score (IFN-CK) of three type I IFN-inducible chemokines (CCL2/CXCL10/CCL19) measured in 109 SLE patients (median 7 occasions over 3.2 years). Longitudinal associations of IFN-CK score with disease activity (SLEDAI-2K) and other variables were assessed using general estimating equation (GEE) methods. IFN-CK was detectable in all patients. SLEDAI-2K was significantly associated with IFN-CK, damage score and prednisolone dose. SLEDAI-2K remained significantly associated with IFN-CK over time after adjustment of covariates. Patients with high time-adjusted mean IFN-CK had lower complement and higher time-adjusted disease activity. Concordance between IFN-CK and SLEDAI-2K varied widely among patients, with some individuals having none, others weak, and a subset very high concordance. In summary in our cohort of SLE patients, serum IFN-CK varied over time with disease activity, but with wide variation in concordance. Differing relationships between IFN pathway activation and disease activity may be valuable in assigning patients to emerging IFN-pathway targeting treatments.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29459655 PMCID: PMC5818532 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20203-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of study population.
| Demographics | No. of patients (N = 109) |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Age at enrolment (years) | 41.7 (13.2) |
| Disease duration (years) | 9.6 [4.6, 16.6] (1.6, 33.6) |
| Total follow-up period (years) | 3.2 [2.4, 4.0] (0.2, 4.6) |
| Number of visits | 7 [5, 11] (3, 27) |
| Number of ACR criteria fulfilled1 | 5 [4, 6] (4, 9) |
| TAM2 SLEDAI-2K3 | 4.4 [2.4, 6.7] (0, 15.1) |
| TAM PGA4 | 0.5 [0.3, 0.9] (0, 2.1) |
| TAM Prednisolone (mg/day) | 5.0 [1.2, 8.6] (0, 33.6) |
| Cumulative PNL (mg) | 3378 [595, 6318] (0, 50820) |
| SLICC SDI score (organ damage index)5 | 1 [0, 2] (0, 9) |
| TAM C3 (g/L) (mean (SD)) | 0.9 (0.3) |
|
| |
| Females | 90 (83%) |
|
| |
| non-Asians | 58 (53%) |
| Asians | 51 (47%) |
| Anti-dsDNA positivity ever | 82 (75%) |
| Organ damage (SLICC-SDI > 0) | 67 (62%) |
| Flares ever (mild/mod./severe) | 81 (74%) |
| Organ specific manifestations | |
| CNS | 10 (9%) |
| Vasculitis | 5 (5%) |
| Musculoskeletal | 35 (32%) |
| Renal | 46 (42%) |
| Cutaneous | 70 (64%) |
| Serositis | 8 (7%) |
| Serological | 96 (88%) |
| Fever | 1 (1%) |
| Haematological | 21 (19%) |
*Except as noted.
1Number of ACR criteria fulfilled at enrolment to the Monash SLE clinic; 2TAM = time adjusted mean; 3SLEDAI-2K score ranges from 0 to 105 and higher scores mean high disease activity; 4PGA score ranges from 0 to 3; 5SLICC SDI score ranges from 0 to 44 and high score mean more organ damage; 6IFN-CK score ranges from 0 to 3.
Univariable associations of SLEDAI-2K determined using generalised estimating equation (GEE) method with covariates at each visit (n = 944 visits from 109 patients).
| RC | (95% CI) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at enrolment (years) | −0.07 | (−0.11,−0.02) | p < 0.01 |
| Disease duration (years) | 0.04 | (−0.04,0.12) | 0.3 |
| PGA1 | 2.59 | (2.11,3.06) | p < 0.01 |
| SLICC SDI score2 | 0.48 | (0.19,0.76) | p < 0.01 |
| Prednisolone (mg/d) | 0.11 | (0.08,0.14) | p < 0.01 |
| IFN-CK score3 | 0.73 | (0.12,1.34) | 0.02 |
| Female gender | 0.01 | (−1.55,1.58) | 0.9 |
| Asian ethnicity | 0.78 | (−0.34,1.91) | 0.17 |
1PGA ranges from 0 to 3; 2SLICC SDI score ranges from 0 to 44; 3IFN-CK score ranges from 0 to 3.
RC: regression coefficient (exponentiated beta coefficient).
CI: confidence interval.
Multivariable associations of SLEDAI-2K determined using generalised estimating equation (GEE) method (n = 939 visits from 109 patients).
| RC | (95% CI) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFN-CK score1 | 0.55 | (0.08, 1.01) | 0.02 |
| Age at enrolment (years) | −0.05 | (−0.08, −0.01) | 0.01 |
| Prednisolone (mg/d) | 0.07 | (0.04, 0.10) | p < 0.01 |
| PGA2 | 2.31 | (1.84, 2.78) | p < 0.01 |
| SLICC SDI score3 | 0.31 | (0.09, 0.52) | 0.01 |
1IFN-CK scores ranged from 0 to 3; 2PGA ranged from 0 to 3; 3SLICC SDI ranged from 0 to 44.
RC: regression coefficient.
CI: confidence interval.
Comparison of patient characteristics between low and high TAM-IFN-CK groups.
| TAM_IFNCK < 0.3 | TAM_IFNCK ≥ 0.3 | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 56) | (n = 53) | ||
|
|
| ||
| Age at enrolment (years) | 43.2 (14.0) | 40.1 (12.3) | 0.2 |
| Disease duration (years) | 8.1 [4.6, 16.1] | 9.6 [5.6, 16.6] | 0.6 |
| Total follow-up period (years) | 3.1 [2.3, 4.0] | 3.3 [2.6, 4.2] | 0.6 |
| Number of visits | 7 [5, 11] | 8 [5, 11] | 0.5 |
| Number of ACR criteria fulfilled1 | 5 [4, 6] | 5 [4, 7] | 0.2 |
| TAM2 SLEDAI-2K3 | 3.6 [2.2, 5.4] | 5.2 [2.8, 6.9] | 0.06 |
| TAM PGA4 | 0.5 [0.3, 0.9] | 0.6 [0.3, 0.9] | 0.3 |
| TAM Prednisolone (mg/day) | 5.0 [0.0, 9.1] | 5.2 [2.8, 8.4] | 0.4 |
| Cumulative PNL (mg) | 2450 [0, 6048] | 3815 [1330, 6388] | 0.3 |
| TAM C3 (g/L) (mean(SD)) | 0.9 [0.3] | 0.8 [0.3] | 0.02 |
|
|
| ||
| Female | 47 (84%) | 43 (81%) | 0.7 |
| Asian ethnicity | 24 (43%) | 27 (51%) | 0.4 |
| Anti-dsDNA positivity ever | 38 (68%) | 44 (83%) | 0.07 |
| Organ damage (SLICC-SDI > 0) | 32 (57%) | 35 (66%) | 0.3 |
| Flares ever | 40 (71%) | 41 (77%) | 0.5 |
| Organ specific manifestations | |||
| CNS | 5 (9%) | 5 (9%) | 0.9 |
| Vasculitis | 2 (4%) | 3 (6%) | 0.6 |
| Musculoskeletal | 15 (27%) | 20 (38%) | 0.2 |
| Renal | 20 (36%) | 26 (49%) | 0.2 |
| Cutaneous | 36 (64%) | 34 (64%) | 0.9 |
| Serositis | 3 (5%) | 5 (9%) | 0.4 |
| Serological | 47 (84%) | 49 (92%) | 0.2 |
| Fever | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 0.3 |
| Haematological | 8 (14%) | 13 (25%) | 0.2 |
*Except as noted
1At enrolment to the Monash SLE clinic; 2TAM = time adjusted mean; 3SLEDAI-2K score ranges from 0 to 105 and higher scores means high disease activity; 4PGA score ranges from 0 to 3; 5SLICC SDI scores range from 0 to 44 and high scores mean more organ damage.
*P-values were derived using t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Pearson’s chi-squared tests to compare means, medians and percentages respectively.
Figure 1IFN-CK SLEDAI-2K concordance in patients with r ≥ 0.7. Concordance between type I interferon inducible chemokine score (IFN-CK) and disease activity (SLEDAI-2k) was assessed in individual patients. A strong concordance between these variables over time (r ≥ 0.7) was seen in a subset of 15 patients.
Figure 2Bland-Altman’s limits-of-agreement for (a) overall study population; (b) patient group with correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.7 for IFN-CK and SLEDAI-2K. Bland-Altman graphs were generated to examine the extent of agreement between type I interferon inducible chemokine score (IFN-CK) and disease activity (SLEDAI-2k) in the overall study population (graph 2a) and in the patient group with correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.7 for IFN-CK and SLEDAI-2k (graph 2b). Greater concordance was seen for lower values of SLEDAI-2k and IFN score.
Patient characteristics by IFN-CK SLEDAI-2K concordance categories.
| IFN-CK SLEDAI-2K concordance categories | p-value* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r < = 0 (n = 39) | 0 < r < 0.7 (n = 48) | r > = 0.7 (n = 15) | ||
|
|
|
| ||
| Age at enrolment (years) | 40.7 (13.6) | 42.4 (11.4) | 38.9 (16.7) | 0.6 |
| Disease duration (years) | 7.6 (3.6, 15.6) | 11.6 (6.1, 16.1) | 7.6 (4.6, 19.6) | 0.2 |
| Number of visits | 8.0 (5.0, 11.0) | 8.5 (6.0, 11.5) | 5.0 (3.0, 8.0) | 0.02 |
| Number of ACR criteria fulfilled1 | 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) | 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) | 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) | 0.9 |
| TAM2 SLEDAI-2K3 | 5.0 (2.4, 6.3) | 3.7 (2.4, 7.2) | 3.9 (2.3, 6.8) | 0.8 |
| TAM PGA4 | 0.5 (0.3, 1.0) | 0.6 (0.3, 0.9) | 0.5 (0.3, 1.0) | 0.9 |
| TAM Prednisolone (mg/day) | 5.3 (1.2, 9.2) | 5.6 (3.6, 10.5) | 2.3 (0.0, 5.5) | 0.04 |
| Cumulative PNL (mg) | 3780 (595, 5845) | 5110 (1863.8, 10745) | 1421 (0, 3990) | 0.03 |
| SLICC SDI score (organ damage)5 | 1.0 (0.0, 2.0) | 1.0 (0.0, 2.5) | 1.0 (0.0, 2.0) | 0.6 |
| TAM C3 (g/L) (mean(SD)) TAM C4 (g/L) (mean(SD)) TAM IFN-CK score6 | 0.8 (0.3) | 0.9 (0.3) | 1.0 (0.3) | 0.18 |
|
|
|
| ||
| Females | 32 (82%) | 43 (90%) | 11 (73%) | 0.3 |
| Asian ethnicity | 19 (49%) | 25 (52%) | 4 (27%) | 0.2 |
| Anti-dsDNA positivity ever | 31 (79%) | 37 (77%) | 10 (67%) | 0.6 |
| Organ damage (SLICC-SDI > 0) | 24 (62%) | 30 (63%) | 8 (53%) | 0.8 |
| Flares ever (mild/mod./severe) | 33 (85%) | 35 (73%) | 13 (87%) | 0.3 |
*except as noted.
1Number of ACR criteria fulfilled at enrolment to the Monash SLE clinic; 2TAM = time adjusted mean; 3SLEDAI-2K score ranges from 0 to 105 and higher scores mean high disease activity; 4PGA score ranges from 0 to 3; 5SLICC SDI score ranges from 0 to 44 and high scores mean more organ damage; 6IFN-CK scores range from 0 to 3.
*P-values were derived using ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis test and Pearson’s chi-squared tests to compare means, medians and percentages respectively.