| Literature DB >> 29459639 |
So Hyeon Bak1,2, Hyunjin Park3,4, Ho Yun Lee5, Youngwook Kim6, Hyung-Lae Kim7, Sin-Ho Jung8, Hyeseung Kim8, Jonghoon Kim9, Keunchil Park10.
Abstract
Imaging features can be useful for identifying distinct genomic differences and have predictive power for certain phenotypes attributed to genomic mutations. We aimed to identify predictive imaging biomarkers that underpin genomic alterations and clinical outcomes in lung squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) using a radiomics approach. In 57 patients with lung SQCC who underwent preoperative computed tomography (CT) and whole-exome DNA sequencing, 63 quantitative imaging features were extracted from CT and 73 clinicoradiological features including imaging features were classified into 8 categories: clinical, global, histogram-based, lung cancer-specific, shape, local, regional, and emphysema. Mutational profiles for core signaling pathways of lung SQCC were classified into five categories: redox stress, apoptosis, proliferation, differentiation, and chromatin remodelers. Range and right lung volume was significantly associated with alternation of apoptosis and proliferation pathway (p = 0.03, and p = 0.03). Energy was associated with the redox stress pathway (p = 0.06). None of the clinicoradiological features showed any significant association with the alteration of differentiation and chromatin remodelers pathway. This study showed that radiomic features indicating five different functional pathways of lung SQCC were different form one another. Radiomics approaches to lung SQCC have the potential to noninvasively predict alterations in core signaling pathways and clinical outcome.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29459639 PMCID: PMC5818618 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21706-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographics of 57 patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma.
| Variables | No. | % |
|---|---|---|
| Age* | 65.5 ± 6.7 | 43.0–78.0 |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 54 | 94.7 |
| Female | 3 | 5.3 |
| Smoking state | ||
| Non-smoker | 3 | 5.3 |
| Ex-smoker | 29 | 50.9 |
| Current smoker | 25 | 43.8 |
| TNM stage | ||
| I | 22 | 38.6 |
| II | 25 | 43.8 |
| III | 8 | 14 |
| IV | 2 | 3.5 |
| T descriptor | ||
| T1 | 10 | 17.5 |
| T2 | 37 | 64.9 |
| T3 | 8 | 14 |
| T4 | 2 | 3.5 |
| N descriptor | ||
| N1 | 41 | 71.9 |
| N2 | 9 | 15.8 |
| N3 | 7 | 12.3 |
| M descriptor | ||
| M0 | 55 | 96.5 |
| M1 | 2 | 3.5 |
| Treatment | ||
| Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy | 13 | 22.8 |
| Palliative chemotherapy or radiation therapy | 10 | 17.4 |
| Operation for recurrence or metastasis | 4 | 7.0 |
| Survival | ||
| Death | 18 | 31.6 |
| Disease-free survival (months)* | 44.5 ± 31.5 | |
| Overall survival (months)* | 51.4 ± 30.2 |
*Data are mean ± SD and range.
Figure 1(A) Distribution of alteration percentage of signaling pathways, and (B) number of alteration of pathway per patients in lung SQCC.
Selected features for prediction of targetable pathways.
| Pathway | Clinical features | Global variables | Histogram-based features | Lung cancer-specific features | Shape features | Local features | Regional features | Emphysema features | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redox stress | Variables | Volume | Energy | Maximum 3D diameter | Cluster prominence | Size-zone variability | |||
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 1.64 (0.32–8.30) | 0.15 (0.02–1.05) | 0.88 (0.20–3.82) | 1.28 (0.64–2.56) | 2.16 (0.66–7.06) | ||||
| 0.55 | 0.06 | 0.86 | 0.49 | 0.20 | |||||
| Apoptosis | Variables | Mass |
| Maximum 3D diameter | Cluster shade | Intensity variability | |||
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 23.94 (0.54- > 999.99) | 0.08 (0.01–0.82) | 2.06 (0.16–26.46) | 0.69 (0.13–3.80) | 0.35 (0.06–2.26) | ||||
| 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.27 | |||||
| Proliferation | Variables | HU at the 97.5th percentile | MPP | Cluster prominence |
| ||||
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 1.83 (0.69–8.61) | 1.33 (0.23–7.56) | 1.77 (0.82–3.81) | 0.35 (0.13–0.90) | |||||
| 0.44 | 0.75 | 0.15 | 0.03 | ||||||
| Differentiation | Variables | Smoking pack-years | Minimum | Spherical disproportion | Intensity variability | ||||
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 1.01 (0.99–1.04) | 1.21 (0.59–2.47) | 0.68 (0.33–1.43) | 0.73 (0.32–1.68) | |||||
| 0.26 | 0.60 | 0.31 | 0.46 | ||||||
| Chromatin remodelers | Variables | Smoking pack-years | Energy | Maximum probability | |||||
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 1.02 (0.99–1.04) | 1.73 (0.94–3.19) | 0.54 (0.28–1.05) | ||||||
| 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.07 |
Data are features selected as variables using univariate analysis by category.
Bold are features selected as independent predictive factors on multivariate analysis.
CI, confidence limits; MPP, mean value of positive pixe.
Figure 2Five functional signaling pathways and genes used for analysis of lung SQCC (Kim et al. J Clin Oncol 2013)[8].
Figure 3Extracting quantitative imaging features from CT images. (A) CT images were obtained on full inspiration. (B) Tumors were segmented by drawing regions of interest (ROIs) that traced tumor edges on all axial images. (C) Quantitative image features were extracted from within defined tumor contours on CT images to quantify features that were global, histogram-based, shape, lung cancer-specific, local, regional, or emphysema. (D) Associations among quantitative image features, clinical data, and gene expression data were analyzed.