| Literature DB >> 29458372 |
Kristoffer Ostridge1,2, Nicholas P Williams3,4, Viktoriya Kim3,4, Stephen Harden5, Simon Bourne3,6, Stuart C Clarke3,7, Emmanuel Aris8, Sonia Mesia-Vela8, Jeanne-Marie Devaster8, Andrew Tuck9, Anthony Williams3,7, Stephen Wootton4, Karl J Staples3,7, Tom M A Wilkinson3,4,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: <Species">span class="Gene">COPD is a complex, heterogeneous disease characterised by progressive development of airflow limitation. Spirometry provides little information about key aspects of pathology and is poorly related to clinical outcome, so other tools are required to investigate the disease. We sought to explore the relationships between quantitative CT analysis with functional, inflammatory and infective assessments of disease to identify the utility of imaging to stratify disease to better predict outcomes and disease response.Entities:
Keywords: COPD; CT; Emphysema; Imaging; Phenotyping
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29458372 PMCID: PMC5819274 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-018-0734-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Characteristics of study subjects included in the study
| GOLD 2 ( | GOLD 3 ( | GOLD 4 ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 67.0 (11.0) | 67.5 (13) | 67.0 (10) | 65.0 (10) | 0.992 |
| Male | 67 | 31 | 25 | 11 | 0.618 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.1 (6.9) | 27.7 (7.3) | 26.5 (8.0) | 25.4 (7.2) | 0.054 |
| Current smoker | 46 | 21 | 18 | 7 | 0.947 |
| Pulmonary Function | |||||
| FEV1% | 47.2 (23.7) | 59.1 (12.9) #^ | 38.8 (10.5)*^ | 26.2 (5.9)*# | < 0.001 |
| FEV1/FVC | 0.43 (0.12) | 0.50 (0.10) #^ | 0.38 (0.15) *^ | 0.29 (0.08) *# | < 0.001 |
| FEF75–25% | 13.2 (8.3) | 17.2 (6.4) #^ | 11.0 (4.7) *^ | 6.8 (2.2) *# | < 0.001 |
| TLCO% | 58.3 (28.7) | 70.4 (23.9) #^ | 53.0 (22.8)* | 44.6 (11.8)* | < 0.001 |
| RV% | 144.8 (59.2) | 133.8 (38.9) #^ | 159.2 (48.1)* | 202.7 (96.6)* | < 0.001 |
| RV/TLC | 0.54 (0.14) | 0.49 (0.14) #^ | 0.58 (0.10)* | 0.64 (0.16)* | < 0.001 |
| Functional Markers | |||||
| 6MWD (meters) | 303.5 (174) | 360.0 (155)^ | 300.0 (156)^ | 169.5 (129)*# | < 0.001 |
| Desaturation on Exertion (%) | 4.0 (5.0) | 3.0 (3.0) #^ | 5.0 (8.0)* | 6.0 (6.5)* | 0.001 |
| Blood Measures | |||||
| Blood neutrophils (109L) | 4.8 (1.6) | 4.8 (1.6) | 4.7 (2.0) | 4.8 (1.6) | 0.914 |
| Blood eosinophils (109L) | 0.20 (0.20) | 0.20 (0.20) | 0.20 (0.20) | 0.20 (0.20) | 0.082 |
| Fibrinogen (g/L) | 4.8 (1.1) | 4.8 (1.1) | 4.8 (1.0) | 5.0 (1.4) | 0.813 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 5.0 (7.0) | 5.0 (6.8) | 4.0 (6.5) | 6.0 (7.0) | 0.570 |
| Procalcitonin (μg/L) | 0.059 (0.03) | 0.056 (0.02) | 0.061 (0.03) | 0.073 (0.05) | 0.236 |
| Sputum Differential | |||||
| Sputum Neutrophils(%) | 45.9 (70.8) | 17.7 (62.6) | 44.3 (75.8) | 71.2 (39.3) | 0.110 |
| Sputum Eosinophils (%) | 2.02 (5.2) | 1.97 (4.0) | 2.20 (5.7) | 2.62 (4.8) | 0.596 |
| CT Measures | |||||
| Emphysema (%LAA<− 950) | 12.0 (20.7) | 9.6 (13.1)#^ | 15.8 (26.9)* | 24.8 (12.3)* | < 0.001 |
| Bronchial wall area (Pi10) | 3.80 (0.12) | 3.79 (0.13) | 3.78 (0.10)^ | 3.84 (0.05)# | 0.040 |
| Small airways disease (E/I MLD) | 0.92 (0.07) | 0.88 (0.07) #^ | 0.93 (0.05)* | 0.96 (0.03)* | < 0.001 |
| Bronchiectasis | 8 (6.6) | 1 (1.8) | 5 (10.2) | 2 (11.8) | 0.143 |
Values given as medians (IQR). Males, smoking status and bronchiectasis given as number of subjects. N = 122 for whole cohort. For gas transfer n = 117, plethysmography n = 113, 6MWT parameters n = 120, blood white cells and procalcitonin n = 121, fibrinogen n = 109, sputum white cell differential n = 66. P value indicates difference between GOLD groups where < 0.05 taken as significant. * significant difference vs. GOLD 2 group, # significant difference vs. GOLD 3 group and ^ significant difference vs. GOLD 4 group
Spearman’s correlation analysis between CT parameters, pulmonary function tests, functional markers, blood and sputum markers
| %LAA<− 950 | E/I MLD | Pi10 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary Function Tests | |||
| FEV1% | −0.49*** | −0.63*** | − 0.11 |
| FVC% | 0.06 | −0.21* | − 0.31** |
| FEV1/FVC | −0.72*** | − 0.64*** | 0.12 |
| TLCO% | −0.51*** | −0.34*** | 0.01 |
| RV% | 0.36*** | 0.64*** | −0.05 |
| RV/TLC | 0.19* | 0.62*** | 0.16 |
| Functional Markers | |||
| 6MWD (meters) | −0.14 | −0.10 | − 0.11 |
| Desaturation on exertion (%) | 0.56*** | 0.27** | −0.11 |
| Blood Markers | |||
| Blood neutrophils (109L) | −0.06 | −0.11 | 0.15 |
| Blood eosinophils (109L) | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Fibrinogen (g/L) | −0.20* | − 0.04 | 0.21* |
| CRP (mg/L) | −0.27** | −0.28** | 0.25* |
| Procalcitonin (μg/L) | −0.01 | −0.06 | 0.18* |
| Sputum Differential | |||
| %neutrophils | 0.17 | 0.19 | −0.10 |
| %eosinophils | 0.16 | 0.04 | −0.11 |
Spearman’s r values given. N = 122 apart from associations with gas transfer (n = 117), plethysmography (n = 113), 6MWT parameters (n = 120), blood white cells and procalcitonin (n = 121), fibrinogen (n = 109) and sputum white cell differential (n = 66). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 1Scatterplots of (a) %LAA<−950 against FEV1% (rho −0.49***) (b) E/I MLD against FEV1% (rho −0.63***) (c) Pi10 against FEV1% (rho −0.11) (d) %LAA<− 950 against TLCO% (rho − 0.51***) (e) E/I MLD against TLCO% (rho − 0.34***) (f) Pi10 against TLCO% (rho 0.01) (g) %LAA<− 950 against RV/TLC (rho 0.19*) (h) E/I MLD against RV/TLC (rho 0.62***) (i) Pi10 against RV/TLC (rho 0.16) (j) %LAA<− 950 against oxygen desaturation (rho 0.56***) (k) E/I MLD against oxygen desaturation (rho 0.27**) (l) Pi10 against oxygen desaturation (rho − 0.11). For comparisons with FEV1% N = 122, for TLCO% N = 117, for RV/TLC N = 113 and for oxygen desaturation N = 120. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Multiple regression analysis predicting FEV1%, TLCO%, RV/TLC, 6MWD, desaturation on exertion, CRP, fibrinogen and sputum neutrophils
| B coefficient | Standardised B coefficient | significance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FEV1% | |||
| %LAA<− 950 | − 0.42 | − 0.34 | < 0.001 |
| E/I MLD | − 180.8 | − 0.56 | < 0.001 |
| BMI | −0.56 | − 0.20 | 0.010 |
| TLCO% | |||
| %LAA<− 950 | −0.62 | −0.37 | < 0.001 |
| FEV1% | 0.49 | −0.39 | < 0.001 |
| Gender | −7.5 | −0.19 | 0.014 |
| RV/TLC | |||
| E/I MLD | 0.75 | 0.30 | 0.003 |
| FEV1% | −0.003 | −0.32 | 0.002 |
| Gender | 0.07 | 0.28 | < 0.001 |
| 6MWD (metres) | |||
| FEV1% | 3.03 | 0.41 | < 0.001 |
| BMI | −5.19 | −0.26 | 0.003 |
| Gender | −38.2 | −0.17 | 0.044 |
| Desaturation on exertion (%) | |||
| %LAA<−950 | 0.041 | 0.73 | < 0.001 |
| BMI | 0.032 | 0.248 | 0.004 |
| Gender | 0.233 | 0.164 | 0.037 |
| CRP (mg/L) | |||
| %LAA<− 950 | −0.026 | −0.34 | < 0.001 |
| Fibrinogen (g/L) | |||
| %LAA<−950 | −0.020 | −0.28 | 0.003 |
| Age | 0.022 | 0.216 | 0.020 |
| Sputum Neutrophils (%) | |||
| Current smoker | −21.1 | −0.29 | 0.018 |
%LAA<−950, E/I MLD, PI10, bronchiectasis, FEV1% and demographics variables (age, gender, current smoking status, pack years and BMI) were combined into a regression model to predict each of the dependent variables. Only variables that made a significant difference to the model are included in the results. The natural log of CRP and desaturation on exertion (+ 1) were used for this analysis to normalise the distribution of the residuals
CT parameters and FEV1% in patient who could walk more or less than 350 m at the 6MWT
| < 350 m ( | > 350 m ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| FEV1% | 40.1 (24.9) | 53.4 (14.9) | 0.002 |
| %LAA<− 950 | 15.8 (24.1) | 9.7 (13.9) | 0.027 |
| E/I MLD | 0.92 (0.07) | 0.91 (0.07) | 0.150 |
| Pi10 | 3.81 (0.12) | 3.79 (0.12) | 0.641 |
Values represent medians and IQR. P value tested using Mann Whitney U test
Logistic regression predicting which variables contributed to patients walking over 350 m or desaturating during the 6MWT
| Odds ratio | 95% Lower CI | 95% upper CI | significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6MWD > 350 m | ||||
| FEV1% | 1.049 | 1.019 | 1.079 | 0.001 |
| Female | 0.379 | 0.165 | 0.871 | 0.022 |
| Desaturation > 5% | ||||
| %LAA<−950 | 1.101 | 1.059 | 1.143 | < 0.001 |
44 subjects desaturated > 5% and 76 subjects did not
45 subjects walked over 350 m and 75 subjects did not
%LAA<− 950, E/I MLD and PI10, FEV1% and demographics variables (age, gender, current smoking status, pack years and BMI) were combined into a regression model to predict each of the dependent variables. Only variables that made a significant difference to the model are included in the results
CT parameters and FEV1% in patient who desaturated or not at 6MWT
| < 5% desaturation ( | > 5% desaturation ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| FEV1% | 52.9 (19.2) | 36.5 (18.4) | < 0.001 |
| %LAA<− 950 | 7.9 (13.5) | 24.9 (19.3) | < 0.001 |
| E/I MLD | 0.91 (0.07) | 0.94 (0.06) | 0.010 |
| Pi10 | 3.91 (0.12) | 3.78 (0.11) | 0.232 |
Values represent medians and IQR. P value tested using Mann Whitney U test
CT parameters in subjects according to sputum microbiology
| Frequency | %LAA<−950 | E/I MLD | Pi10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potentially Pathogenic Bacteria | ||||
| Culture positive | 55 | 10.9 (17.2) | 0.92 (0.07) | 3.79 (0.12) |
| Culture negative | 51 | 15.1 (24.0) | 0.90 (0.07) | 3.78 (0.09) |
| P value | – | 0.260 | 0.152 | 0.146 |
| Haemophilus influenzae | ||||
| Culture positive | 31 | 11.5 (18.0) | 0.92 (0.08) | 3.79 (0.11) |
| Culture negative | 75 | 13.3 (20.0) | 0.91 (0.07) | 3.79 (0.10) |
| P value | – | 0.370 | 0.207 | 0.197 |
| Moraxella catarrhalis | ||||
| Culture positive | 8 | 12.4 (23.1) | 0.93 (0.07) | 3.78 (0.10) |
| Culture negative | 98 | 12.5 (20.3) | 0.91 (0.07) | 3.79 (0.11) |
| P value | – | 0.981 | 0.720 | 0.549 |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae | ||||
| Culture positive | 18 | 10.2 (9.9) | 0.92 (0.05) | 3.83 (0.11) |
| Culture negative | 88 | 14.3 (24.9) | 0.91 (0.08) | 3.79 (0.09) |
| P value | – | 0.501 | 0.626 | 0.203 |
|
| ||||
| Culture positive | 6 | 13.5 (22.4) | 0.91 (0.08) | 3.74 (0.05) |
| Culture negative | 100 | 12.5 (20.6) | 0.91 (0.07) | 3.80 (0.11) |
| P value | – | 0.667 | 0.682 | 0.039* |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | ||||
| Culture positive | 6 | 21.4 (27.5) | 0.95 (0.06) | 3.83 (0.16) |
| Culture negative | 100 | 12.0 (20.1) | 0.91 (0.07) | 3.79 (0.11) |
| P value | – | 0.367 | 0.034* | 0.498 |
Frequency given as number of subjects. For CT parameters, values represent medians and IQR. *P < 0.05 using Mann Whitney U test