| Literature DB >> 29456849 |
Kohei Nakamura1, Kentaro Nakayama1, Toshiko Minamoto1, Tomoka Ishibashi1, Kaori Sanuki1, Hitomi Yamashita1, Ruriko Ono1, Hiroki Sasamori1, Takayoshi Komatsu-Fujii1, Masako Ishikawa1, Satoru Kyo1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to determine the prognostic value of the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) in endometrial carcinoma (EC). Patients with EC who underwent surgery at the Shimane University Hospital between January 1997 and December 2013 were enrolled (n=118). The associations between pretreatment GPS and clinical parameters, including age, histological type, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, tumor grade, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen levels, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), were investigated. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were evaluated with Cox's proportional hazards regression model. A high pretreatment GPS was associated with advanced clinical stage, histological type and tumor grade (P<0.001, P=0.007 and P=0.006, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified a high GPS as an independent negative prognostic factor for PFS and OS (P=0.025 and P=0.044, respectively). Therefore, a high pretreatment GPS has prognostic value and the potential to be a predictive marker for surgical outcome in patients with EC. Evaluation of pretreatment GPS may aid in the identification of high-risk populations, which may improve treatment selection and patient outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Glasgow prognostic score; endometrial carcinoma; overall survival; progression-free survival
Year: 2018 PMID: 29456849 PMCID: PMC5795600 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2018.1551
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Clin Oncol ISSN: 2049-9450
Clinical characteristics of the patient population (n=118).
| Characteristics | No. of patients (%) |
|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis, years | |
| <60 | 55 (47) |
| ≥60 | 63 (53) |
| FIGO stage | |
| I, II | 79 (67) |
| III, IV | 39 (33) |
| Histology | |
| Endometrioid | 99 (84) |
| Other | 19 (16) |
| Grade | |
| G1 | 53 (45) |
| G2, G3 | 65 (55) |
| Pretreatment GPS | |
| 0 | 91 (77) |
| 1 | 19 (16) |
| 2 | 8 (7) |
| CA19-9, U/ml | |
| <37 | 93 (79) |
| ≥37 | 25 (21) |
| CEA, ng/ml | |
| <5.0 | 97 (82) |
| ≥5.0 | 21 (18) |
CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; GPS, Glasgow prognostic score.
Association of clinicopathological parameters with pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score.
| Pretreatment GPS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | No. of patients | 0 | 1 | 2 | P-value |
| Age at diagnosis, years | 0.348 | ||||
| <60 | 55 | 45 | 6 | 4 | |
| ≥60 | 63 | 46 | 13 | 4 | |
| FIGO stage | <0.001 | ||||
| I, II | 79 | 70 | 8 | 1 | |
| III, IV | 39 | 21 | 11 | 7 | |
| Histology | 0.007 | ||||
| Endometrioid | 99 | 82 | 12 | 5 | |
| Other | 19 | 9 | 7 | 3 | |
| Grade | 0.006 | ||||
| G1 | 53 | 47 | 6 | 0 | |
| G2, G3 | 65 | 44 | 13 | 8 | |
| CA19-9, U/ml | 0.116 | ||||
| <37 | 93 | 76 | 13 | 4 | |
| ≥37 | 25 | 16 | 5 | 4 | |
| CEA, ng/ml | 0.567 | ||||
| <5.0 | 97 | 79 | 11 | 7 | |
| ≥5.0 | 21 | 15 | 4 | 1 | |
CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; GPS, Glasgow prognostic score.
Figure 1.Kaplan-Meier estimates of the prognostic value of a high pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) for (A) progression-free survival and (B) overall survival in patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for progression-free survival.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factors | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P-value | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P-value |
| Age at diagnosis, years | 2.559 | 1.132–5.784 | 0.024 | 2.090 | 0.899–4.862 | 0.087 |
| FIGO stage | 5.271 | 2.376–11.694 | <0.001 | 3.981 | 1.712–9.256 | 0.001 |
| Histology | 4.787 | 2.268–10.162 | <0.001 | 2.794 | 1.249–6.248 | 0.012 |
| Grade | 4.778 | 1.662–13.738 | 0.004 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Pretreatment GPS | 2.618 | 1.654–4.154 | <0.001 | 1.792 | 1.076–2.985 | 0.025 |
| CA19-9, U/ml | 0.943 | 0.381–2.332 | 0.899 | – | – | – |
| CEA, ng/ml | 1.978 | 0.727–5.380 | 0.181 | – | – | – |
CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CI, confidence interval; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; GPS, Glasgow prognostic score; N/A, not available.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factors | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P-value | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P-value |
| Age at diagnosis, years | 1.976 | 0.740–5.275 | 0.174 | – | – | – |
| FIGO stage | 8.658 | 2.802–26.754 | <0.001 | 5.469 | 1.649–18.137 | 0.005 |
| Histology | 5.447 | 2.129–13.940 | <0.001 | 4.214 | 1.346–13.197 | 0.014 |
| Grade | 3.698 | 1.070–12.782 | 0.039 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Pretreatment GPS | 2.583 | 1.454–4.588 | <0.001 | 2.126 | 1.021–4.428 | 0.044 |
| CA19-9, U/ml | 1.392 | 0.493–3.927 | 0.532 | – | – | – |
| CEA, ng/ml | 4.030 | 1.342–12.101 | 0.013 | 4.110 | 1.246–13.553 | 0.020 |
CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CI, confidence interval; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; GPS, Glasgow prognostic score; N/A, not available.