Late-stage oxidation using liver microsomes was applied to phosphodiesterase 2 inhibitor 1 to reduce its clearance by cytochrome P450 enzymes, introduce renal clearance, and minimize the risk for victim drug-drug interactions. This approach yielded PF-06815189 (2) with improved physicochemical properties and a mixed metabolic profile. This example highlights the importance of C-H diversification methods to drug discovery.
Late-stage oxidation using liver microsomes was applied to phosphodiesterase 2 inhibitor 1 to reduce its clearance by cytochrome P450 enzymes, introduce renal clearance, and minimize the risk for victim drug-drug interactions. This approach yielded PF-06815189 (2) with improved physicochemical properties and a mixed metabolic profile. This example highlights the importance of C-H diversification methods to drug discovery.
Late-stage
C–H diversification
has gained considerable attention in drug discovery.[1,2] By adding small substituents to pre-existing drug scaffolds, these
methods have the ability to accelerate analogue generation, therefore
potentially reducing the high cost of pharmaceutical research.[3] Examples of C–H functionalizations applied
to drug molecules include the directed palladium-catalyzed functionalization
of celecoxib.[4] Rhodium-stabilized carbenoids
facilitated the site-specific C–H insertion at the N-methyl functionality of various pharmaceuticals such as
sercloremine.[5] Radical-mediated functionalization
of heterocylic drugs (e.g., caffeine) has been achieved using zinc
sulfinate salts.[6] Iridium-catalyzed C–H
borylation has been applied to a c-Met kinase inhibitor.[7] Hydroxylation using iron catalysis has been used
for the diversification of amino acids and peptides.[8] Alternative oxidation methods include biocatalysis with
recombinant cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and microbial preparations,
electrochemistry, as well as biomimetic catalysis.[9,10] We
have previously described methods for metabolite biosynthesis that
leverage various in vitro drug metabolism systems (e.g., liver microsomes)
and quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy using
cryomicroprobe technology coupled with a mathematically inserted internal
standard signal.[11] In addition to utilizing
this approach for the preparation of drug metabolites, we now use
it routinely as a means for late-state lead diversification (see workflow
in Scheme ) and have
recently disclosed the diversification of several known drugs to generate
analogues with improved metabolic stability.[12] This approach is particularly attractive if hydroxylation of the
lead molecule does not negatively impact the analogue’s target
organ distribution and may not be applicable to drugs that require
central activity. Creation of small quantities of such products, quantified
by NMR in DMSO-d6 solutions, permits these
materials to be rapidly tested for target potency and examined in
other in vitro assays. We herein report the application of this late-stage
functionalization platform to the Pfizer phosphodiesterase 2A (PDE2A)
inhibitor program: Oxidation of triazinone lead 1 identified
potential clinical candidate 7-(1,3-dimethyl-5-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methylimidazo[5,1-f][1,2,4]triazin-4(3H)-one (PF-06815189, 2), which maintained parent potency but significantly reduced
CYP metabolism. Its low oxidative turnover and high polarity introduced
the desired amount of renal elimination in three preclinical species,
minimizing the clinical victim drug–drug interaction (DDI)
risk. This example therefore highlights the power of C–H diversification
methods as a strategic tool to rapidly discover molecules with enhanced
druglike properties since it allows generation of in vitro data without
the need for de novo synthesis.
Scheme 1
Workflow of Late-Stage Lead Diversification
Microsomal Screen
PDE2A is one of 11 gene families of cyclic nucleotide-specific
phosphodiesterases.[13] It is a cyclic guanosine
monophosphate (cGMP) activated enzyme that hydrolyses the secondary
messengers cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine
monophosphate (cGMP) to the corresponding acyclic nucleotides (AMP
and GMP). Under most conditions, it is cAMP hydrolysis that mediates
effects of PDE2A inhibition to its corresponding acyclic nucleotide
(AMP). Endothelial cells express phosphodiesterases, including PDE3,
PDE5, and PDE2. These phosphodiesterases exert a coordinated effect
on cAMP and cGMP levels and, by inhibiting PDE2, it is possible to
raise cAMP levels in endothelial cells, ultimately leading to a reduction
in vascular permeability. PDE2 inhibitors may, therefore, be a therapy
for indications resulting from a dysregulation of vascular permeability
such as stroke, sepsis, and acute lung injury.[14]We recently disclosed pyrazolopyrimidine 3 as a brain
penetrant PDE2 inhibitor for the treatment of neurological disorders
(Scheme ).[15] Compound 3 binds to PDE2 analogously
to cAMP, as described by Helal et al.[15] In the binding of 4 (BAY 60-7550) to PDE2, however,
the orientation of Gln859 is switched and resembles the cGMP binding
mode.[16−18] To design a proprietary inhibitor that binds the
PDE2 enzyme similarly to 4, we substituted the pyrazolopyrimidine
moiety in 3 with the triazinone core of 4, yielding analogue 1 (Scheme ; see Scheme for the synthesis of 1).
Scheme 2
Design
Strategy to PDE2 Inhibitor 1
Topological polar surface area.
Number of replicates in parentheses.
Intrinsic scaled clearance.
Apparent passive permeability
in the Ralph Russ Canine Kidney cell line.[19]
Scheme 3
Synthesis of 1 and Biocatalytic Oxidation
to 2
Reagents and conditions: (a)
Br2, DMF, 0–25 °C, 65%; (b) POCl3, NEt3, toluene, reflux; (c) pyrrolidine, NEt3, CH2Cl2, 0–25 °C, 77%, two steps;
(d) Pd(dppf)Cl2·CH2Cl2, Na2CO3, dioxane/H2O, 110 °C, 62%;
(e) 1 M HCl, THF, reflux, 86%; (f) S. aerocolonigenes ATCC 39243 in Iowa medium, DMSO, 30 °C, 7 days, 20%.
Design
Strategy to PDE2 Inhibitor 1
Topological polar surface area.Number of replicates in parentheses.Intrinsic scaled clearance.Apparent passive permeability
in the Ralph Russ Canine Kidney cell line.[19]
Synthesis of 1 and Biocatalytic Oxidation
to 2
Reagents and conditions: (a)
Br2, DMF, 0–25 °C, 65%; (b) POCl3, NEt3, toluene, reflux; (c) pyrrolidine, NEt3, CH2Cl2, 0–25 °C, 77%, two steps;
(d) Pd(dppf)Cl2·CH2Cl2, Na2CO3, dioxane/H2O, 110 °C, 62%;
(e) 1 M HCl, THF, reflux, 86%; (f) S. aerocolonigenes ATCC 39243 in Iowa medium, DMSO, 30 °C, 7 days, 20%.Docking of 1 into PDE2 suggests that
its triazinone
core has interactions similar to those found in the X-ray cocrystal
structure of 4 (Figure ).[16] These include hydrogen
bonds with Gln812, Gln859, Tyr655, and the backbone carbonyl of Asp808
and aromatic stacking and van der Waals interactions with the hydrophobic
clamp residues Phe862 and Ile826. The p-trifluorophenyl
group of 1 occupies a pocket distinct to PDE2 and necessary
for selectivity over other PDEs.[15] The
additional methyl group on the pyrazole ring of 1, relative
to 3, reduced the strain energy to adopt the bound conformation
by enforcing a local minimum structure with a dihedral angle (pyrazole–imidazotriazinone)
of ∼45°. This conformation requires less than 1 kcal/mol
to adopt the bound conformation dihedral angle of ∼66°,
mimicking the low-energy conformation of 3 (dihedral
angle of 67°), optimal for the interaction of the p-trifluorophenyl group with the selectivity pocket. In contrast,
without the additional methyl group, the local minimum structure has
a dihedral angle of 0.0° and requires ∼3 kcal/mol to adopt
the bound conformation.
Figure 1
Modeled pose of compound 1 (yellow) in PDE2 showing
key residue interactions (green sticks). Hydrogen-bond interactions
are indicated by yellow dashed lines.
Modeled pose of compound 1 (yellow) in PDE2 showing
key residue interactions (green sticks). Hydrogen-bond interactions
are indicated by yellow dashed lines.As shown in Scheme , compound 1 was characterized by a favorable
potency
(PDE2 IC50 = 0.6 nM) and moderate metabolic stability in
human liver microsomes and hepatocytes (HLM/HHEP CLint,s = 16/18 mL/min/kg). Its lipophilic efficiency[20] (LipE = 5.9) and lipophilic metabolism efficiency[21] (LipMetE = 1.9) parameters also indicated an
appropriate level of potency and metabolic stability for a lead compound.
Triazinone 1 was evaluated in a panel of human recombinant
CYPs, suggesting that CYP3A4 was the main cytochrome involved in the
metabolism of 1. The in vivo rat clearance profile of 1 did also not show any extra-hepatic clearance pathways.
Taken together, the in vitro and in vivo clearance data indicated
that 1 has a distinct probability for exclusive clearance
by CYP3A4, resulting in a risk for clinical victim DDI.[22]To improve metabolic stability and lower
DDI risk, a design strategy
was implemented that reduced the lipophilicity of 1 in
order to minimize oxidative turnover by CYP enzymes and increase renal
elimination, giving a PDE2 inhibitor with a mixed clearance profile.
Renal clearance typically increases with reduced lipophilicity and
passive permeability, since both properties minimize passive reabsorption
through the nephron.[23,24] Since a hydroxy group reduces
lipophilicity by more than half a log unit, a late-stage oxidation
strategy was used to rapidly prepare hydroxylated analogues of 1 with appropriate lipophilicity.Analogue 1 was subjected to metabolism by a panel
of liver microsomal samples from several species, including human,
and heterologously expressed common human P450 enzymes. The metabolite
profiles were analyzed and compared by HPLC–MS, and it was
determined that cynomolgus monkey liver microsomes offered the best
promise of delivering new products with a good level of substrate
turnover. A monkey liver microsomal incubation was therefore carried
out at a substrate scale of 600 nmol in an incubation volume of 30
mL. From this single incubation, three new products were isolated:
two monohydroxyl products (2 and 5) and
one dihydroxy product (6, Table ). Notably, these analogues maintain good
inhibitory potency at PDE2 (PDE2 IC50 = 0.4–7.8
nM) and have higher metabolic stability (HLM CLint,s < 9.2 mL/min/kg) than parent analogue 1. Analogue 2 has the most favorable balance of potency
and metabolic stability with significant improvements in both LipE
(LipE = 7.4) and LipMetE (LipMetE = 2.4) values relative to lead 1, reflecting that hydroxylation of 1 enhanced
drug-likeness. All three hydroxylated analogues are also in the appropriate
low lipophilicity space (clogP = 0.7–2.0, TPSA = 101–121)
for renal clearance, and analogue 2 has a 3-fold decreased
passive permeability value relative to 1 (2: RRCK Papp = 8 × 10–6 cm/s vs 1: RRCK Papp =
23 × 10–6 cm/s), reducing the extent of reabsorption
through the nephron and thus favoring renal clearance. Compound 2 also has good selectivity over other phosphodiesterases
with, at least, a 1000-fold margin (PDE5/2 selectivity: 2439 nM/0.4
nM). Broader selectivity screening with 2 demonstrated
no significant activities (i.e., IC50 or EC50 > 10 μM) in a broad spectrum BioPrint panel, in which the
Na+ channel (site 2) had the greatest activity (17% inhibition
of binding at 10 μM).
Table 1
In Vitro PDE2 Potency
and Absorption,
Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion (ADME) Characteristics of
Analogues Obtained through C–H Oxidation
2
5
6
clogP/TPSAa
2.0/101
2.0/101
0.7/121
PDE2
IC50 (nM)b
0.4 (5)
6.9 (4)
7.8 (4)
HLM/HHEP CLint,sc (mL/min/kg)
<8.0/<0.36
<8.0/–
<9.2/–
RRCK Pappd (×10–6 cm/s)
8
17
5
Topological polar surface area.
Number of replicates in parentheses.
Intrinsic scaled clearance.
Apparent passive permeability in
the Ralph Russ Canine Kidney cell line.[19]
Topological polar surface area.Number of replicates in parentheses.Intrinsic scaled clearance.Apparent passive permeability in
the Ralph Russ Canine Kidney cell line.[19]The small-scale microsomal
biosynthesis enabled rapid identification
of inhibitor 2 with desired attributes, resulting in
accelerated progress on the PDE2 program. To access this new lead
on scale for in vivo studies, a two-pronged approach was implemented
reliant either on a biocatalytic or purely synthetic strategy. In
the biocatalysis route, switching the microsomal to a more established,
and cost-effective, microbial oxidation enabled the synthesis of hundreds
of milligrams of 2 from 1, the synthesis
of which is shown in Scheme . Bromination of known imidazotriazinone 7(25) gave compound 8, and subsequent
chlorination with phosphoryl chloride and a SnAr reaction with pyrrolidine
then furnished triazene 9. Pyrrolidine served as a protection
group to enhance the ensuing cross-coupling reaction. Thus, reaction
of 9 with boronate 10 under standard Suzuki
conditions, followed by pyrrolidine removal under acidic conditions,
furnished 1. More than 350 microorganisms were screened
for the microbial oxidation of 1 to 2, and
the optimized conditions utilized a 7-day incubation of 1 with Saccharothrix aerocolonigenes to yield 2 in 20% yield.A purely synthetic approach was used
to access multigram quantities
of 2 for in vivo studies and relied on symmetrical imidazole 11 (Scheme ). The electron-withdrawing nature of its diester groups facilitated
anion formation and subsequent amination under mild conditions. Thus,
amination of 11 with hydroxylamine O-sulfonic acid gave aminoimidazole 12 in 78% yield.
Hydroxylamine O-sulfonic acid was selected as the
aminating reagent due its superior safety profile based on differential
scanning calorimetry and availability from commercial sources.[26] Coupling of aminoimidazole 12 with
ethyl acetimidate under basic conditions produced imidazotriazinone
smoothly. Next, halogenation gave the desired bromide 13 in high yield. In analogy to the synthesis of 4, triazinone 13 was then masked as the corresponding pyrrolidine–triazene,
this time via the activated triazole intermediate[27] due to the high reactivity and instability of the corresponding
triazene chloride. Suzuki cross-coupling with boronate 10 then gave intermediate 14 in excellent yield. Reduction
of the ester group with lithium borohydride to 15 and
removal of the pyrrolidine protecting group with hydrochloric acid,
furnished candidate 2. Hence, this method afforded the
target in eight steps from the diester–imidazole with a 26%
overall yield.
Scheme 4
Synthesis of Candidate 2, Leveraging
the Symmetry of
Diester–Imidazole 11
Reagents
and conditions: (a)
K2CO3, H2O/EtOH, H2NOSO3H, 0–25 °C, 78%; (b) DIPEA, 2-Me-THF, reflux;
(c) NBS, HOAc/MeCN, 70 °C, 48%, 2 steps; (d) 1,2,4-triazole,
POCl3, NEt3, CH2Cl2; (e)
pyrrolidine, NEt3, CH2Cl2, 25 °C,
86%, 2 steps; (f) 10, Pd(dppf)Cl2·CH2Cl2, Na2CO3, dioxane/H2O, 110 °C, 91%; (g) LiBH4, THF, 50 °C,
98%; (h) 1 M HCl, THF, reflux, 92%.
Synthesis of Candidate 2, Leveraging
the Symmetry of
Diester–Imidazole 11
Reagents
and conditions: (a)
K2CO3, H2O/EtOH, H2NOSO3H, 0–25 °C, 78%; (b) DIPEA, 2-Me-THF, reflux;
(c) NBS, HOAc/MeCN, 70 °C, 48%, 2 steps; (d) 1,2,4-triazole,
POCl3, NEt3, CH2Cl2; (e)
pyrrolidine, NEt3, CH2Cl2, 25 °C,
86%, 2 steps; (f) 10, Pd(dppf)Cl2·CH2Cl2, Na2CO3, dioxane/H2O, 110 °C, 91%; (g) LiBH4, THF, 50 °C,
98%; (h) 1 M HCl, THF, reflux, 92%.The in
vivo efficacy of compound 2 was assessed in
the guinea pig Miles Assay, in which histamine, injected intradermally,
increases vascular permeability as measured by the extravasation of
Evan’s blue dye-labeled albumin from blood to skin.[28] As shown in Figure , 2 was effective at reducing
histamine-mediated increases in vascular permeability at all doses
tested.
Figure 2
Administration of 2 significantly reduced histamine-induced
extravasation of Evan’s Blue dye in guinea pig skin (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005).
Administration of 2 significantly reduced histamine-induced
extravasation of Evan’s Blue dye in guinea pig skin (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005).Due to its favorable pharmacological and in vitro ADME profile,
the pharmacokinetic attributes of 2 were assessed in
rat, dog and nonhuman primate (NHP). As shown in Table , 2 is characterized
by low plasma clearance (CLp), low steady-state
volume of distribution (Vss), short half-life
(t1/2), and good bioavailability (%F =
50–79%). Compound 2 also had the desired renal
clearance component in all three preclinical species, with 22, 48,
and 26% renal clearance in rat, dog, and NHP, respectively. In accordance
with the design strategy of introducing renal clearance by increasing
compound polarity and minimizing compound reabsorption through the
nephron, the renal excretion was passive in nature as indicated by
the renal clearance being at or below the glomerular filtration rate.
Integration of the in vitro and in vivo properties leads to predicted
human pharmacokinetics for 2 that are characterized by
a low plasma clearance (2.9 mL/min/kg), moderate volume of distribution
(0.9 L/kg), and a moderate t1/2 of 3.7
h. Notably, a daily dose of only 1.3 mg is required to achieve an
average PDE2 IC90 coverage over 24 h, reflecting the exquisite
drug-like attributes of 2. Compound 2 was
evaluated in 2-week rat and dog exploratory toxicology studies with
adequate exposure multiples over the PDE2 IC50 and has
been considered for indications caused by impaired vascular permeability.
Table 2
Preclinical Pharmacokinetics of Compound 2a
CLpb (mL/min/kg)
Vssc (L/kg)
t1/2d (h)
%Fe
% renal clearancef
rat
28
1.5
1.2
50
22
dog
1.3
0.4
4.8
79
48
NHP
4.0
0.8
3.6
61
26
N = 2 animals/dose
in all studies.
Observed
plasma clearance.
Steady-state
volume of distribution.
Half-life.
Bioavailability.
Percent dose recovered in urine
(0–24 h).
N = 2 animals/dose
in all studies.Observed
plasma clearance.Steady-state
volume of distribution.Half-life.Bioavailability.Percent dose recovered in urine
(0–24 h).In summary,
we have successfully applied a late-stage functionalization
strategy using microsomal oxidation to the PDE2 inhibitor program
at Pfizer. As reflected by the significant increases in the LipE and
LipMetE values, this approach improved the drug-likeness of the early
lead 1 and allowed rapid identification of the potential
clinical candidate 2. Importantly, this hydroxylation
also introduced the desired amount of renal clearance, minimizing
the risk for clinical victim drug–drug interactions. This work
therefore highlights the impact late-stage diversification technologies
can have on drug discovery by accelerating the speed to novel analogues
and fine-tuning properties to achieve an optimal balance of in vitro
and in vivo ADME and potency attributes.
Authors: Ting Zhang; Yong Liu; Xianshu Yang; Gary E Martin; Huifang Yao; Jackie Shang; Randal M Bugianesi; Kenneth P Ellsworth; Lisa M Sonatore; Peter Nizner; Edward C Sherer; Susan E Hill; Ian W Knemeyer; Wayne M Geissler; Peter J Dandliker; Roy Helmy; Harold B Wood Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Gregory S Walker; Jonathan N Bauman; Tim F Ryder; Evan B Smith; Douglas K Spracklin; R Scott Obach Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Antonia F Stepan; Gregory W Kauffman; Christopher E Keefer; Patrick R Verhoest; Martin Edwards Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2013-08-21 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Monalisa F Azevedo; Fabio R Faucz; Eirini Bimpaki; Anelia Horvath; Isaac Levy; Rodrigo B de Alexandre; Faiyaz Ahmad; Vincent Manganiello; Constantine A Stratakis Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Christopher J Helal; Eric P Arnold; Tracey L Boyden; Cheng Chang; Thomas A Chappie; Kimberly F Fennell; Michael D Forman; Mihaly Hajos; John F Harms; William E Hoffman; John M Humphrey; Zhijun Kang; Robin J Kleiman; Bethany L Kormos; Che-Wah Lee; Jiemin Lu; Noha Maklad; Laura McDowell; Scot Mente; Rebecca E O'Connor; Jayvardhan Pandit; Mary Piotrowski; Anne W Schmidt; Christopher J Schmidt; Hirokazu Ueno; Patrick R Verhoest; Edward X Yang Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Shawn J Stachel; Richard Berger; Ashley B Nomland; Anthony T Ginnetti; Daniel V Paone; Deping Wang; Vanita Puri; Henry Lange; Jason Drott; Jun Lu; Jacob Marcus; Michael P Dwyer; Sokreine Suon; Jason M Uslaner; Sean M Smith Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Giuseppe Cecere; Laura Guasch; Andres M Olivares-Morales; Kenichi Umehara; Antonia F Stepan Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2022-08-23 Impact factor: 4.632