Kazuhisa Hatayama1, Masanori Terauchi2, Kenichi Saito3, Jun Aoki4, Satoshi Nonaka3, Hiroshi Higuchi5. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization Gunma Central Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan. Electronic address: hatayaman@gmail.com. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization Gunma Central Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan. 4. Department of Radiology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Gunma Central Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan. 5. Department of Orthopaedic Sports Surgery, Asakura Sports Rehabilitation Clinic, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing ramp lesions, to compare them between 1.5- and 3-T MRI, and to evaluate whether bone contusion of the posterior lip of the medial tibial plateau was associated with ramp lesions. METHODS: For 155 knees that underwent primary ACL reconstruction, we prospectively examined for ramp lesions and medial meniscal body tears on MRI. MRI diagnosis of ramp lesions required high signal irregularity of the capsular margin or separation in the meniscocapsular junction of the medial meniscus posterior horn on sagittal images. Bone contusion of the posterior lip of the medial tibial plateau was verified in 105 knees with MRI performed within 6 weeks after injury. All ramp lesions were identified by transcondylar observation during surgery. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for ramp lesions and body tears were measured. Furthermore, we evaluated whether bone contusion of the medial tibial plateau was associated with ramp lesions. The χ-square test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: During surgery, ramp lesions were observed in 46 knees and medial meniscal body tears were seen in 35 knees. The sensitivity of MRI for ramp lesions was 71.7% and specificity was 90.5%. The sensitivity for ramp lesions was significantly lower than that for meniscal body tears (94.3%) (P = .01). The sensitivity of 3-T MRI (83.3%) was superior to that of 1.5-T MRI (67.6%), but not significantly different. The incidence of bone contusions was not significantly different among ramp lesions (38.5%), body tears (40.0%), or no tears (30.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of MRI for diagnosing ramp lesions was significantly lower than that for medial meniscal body tears. Bone contusion of the posterior lip of the medial tibial plateau on MRI was not associated with ramp lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative trial.
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing ramp lesions, to compare them between 1.5- and 3-T MRI, and to evaluate whether bone contusion of the posterior lip of the medial tibial plateau was associated with ramp lesions. METHODS: For 155 knees that underwent primary ACL reconstruction, we prospectively examined for ramp lesions and medial meniscal body tears on MRI. MRI diagnosis of ramp lesions required high signal irregularity of the capsular margin or separation in the meniscocapsular junction of the medial meniscus posterior horn on sagittal images. Bone contusion of the posterior lip of the medial tibial plateau was verified in 105 knees with MRI performed within 6 weeks after injury. All ramp lesions were identified by transcondylar observation during surgery. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for ramp lesions and body tears were measured. Furthermore, we evaluated whether bone contusion of the medial tibial plateau was associated with ramp lesions. The χ-square test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: During surgery, ramp lesions were observed in 46 knees and medial meniscal body tears were seen in 35 knees. The sensitivity of MRI for ramp lesions was 71.7% and specificity was 90.5%. The sensitivity for ramp lesions was significantly lower than that for meniscal body tears (94.3%) (P = .01). The sensitivity of 3-T MRI (83.3%) was superior to that of 1.5-T MRI (67.6%), but not significantly different. The incidence of bone contusions was not significantly different among ramp lesions (38.5%), body tears (40.0%), or no tears (30.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of MRI for diagnosing ramp lesions was significantly lower than that for medial meniscal body tears. Bone contusion of the posterior lip of the medial tibial plateau on MRI was not associated with ramp lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative trial.
Authors: Jie C Nguyen; Apurva S Shah; Michael K Nguyen; Soroush Baghdadi; Anthony Nicholson; Andressa Guariento; Summer L Kaplan Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2021-01-15
Authors: Matthew Greenaway; Edward Walton; Daren Gibson; Anton Le Roux; Piers Yates; Jay Ebert; Peter D'Alessandro Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2020-06-13