Claudia Luck-Sikorski1, Georg Schomerus2, Thomas Jochum3, Steffi G Riedel-Heller4. 1. Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) AdiposityDiseases, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany; SRH University of Applied Health Sciences, Gera, Germany. Electronic address: claudia.luck-sikorski@srh.de. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; HELIOS Hanseklinikum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany. 3. Department of Psychiatry, SRH Hospital, Gera, Germany. 4. Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Obesity and depression are common conditions in the general public and show a high level of co-morbidity. Both conditions are stigmatized, i.e., associated with negative attitudes and discrimination. Previous research shows that devalued conditions can overlap or combine to produce a layered stigma which is associated with more negative health outcomes than either single devalued condition alone. This study therefore set out to investigate the double stigma of obesity and depression. METHODS: A telephone-based representative study of the German population was conducted. Vignettes describing women with obesity, depression or both conditions were presented, followed by a set of items on semantic differentials based on previous stigma research of depression (depression stigma DS) and obesity (Fat Phobia Scale FPS). Personal experience with depression and obesity was assessed. RESULTS: All comparisons were significant in univariate ANOVA, showing negative attitudes measured by the FPS and the DS to be most pronounced in the double stigma condition. Multivariate analysis, controlling for age, gender, education and personal experience with the stigma condition (e.g. having obesity or depression), show that the double stigma obesity and depression is associated to more negative attitudes on the FPS (b=0.163, p<0.001) and the DS (b=0.154, p=0.002) compared to the single-stigma condition. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of the layered stigma of obesity and depression may need to be considered in mental health settings when treating the depressed patient with obesity, but likewise in obesity care when treating the obese patient with depression.
OBJECTIVES:Obesity and depression are common conditions in the general public and show a high level of co-morbidity. Both conditions are stigmatized, i.e., associated with negative attitudes and discrimination. Previous research shows that devalued conditions can overlap or combine to produce a layered stigma which is associated with more negative health outcomes than either single devalued condition alone. This study therefore set out to investigate the double stigma of obesity and depression. METHODS: A telephone-based representative study of the German population was conducted. Vignettes describing women with obesity, depression or both conditions were presented, followed by a set of items on semantic differentials based on previous stigma research of depression (depression stigma DS) and obesity (Fat Phobia Scale FPS). Personal experience with depression and obesity was assessed. RESULTS: All comparisons were significant in univariate ANOVA, showing negative attitudes measured by the FPS and the DS to be most pronounced in the double stigma condition. Multivariate analysis, controlling for age, gender, education and personal experience with the stigma condition (e.g. having obesity or depression), show that the double stigma obesity and depression is associated to more negative attitudes on the FPS (b=0.163, p<0.001) and the DS (b=0.154, p=0.002) compared to the single-stigma condition. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of the layered stigma of obesity and depression may need to be considered in mental health settings when treating the depressedpatient with obesity, but likewise in obesity care when treating the obesepatient with depression.
Authors: Carola Deischinger; Elma Dervic; Michael Leutner; Lana Kosi-Trebotic; Peter Klimek; Alexander Kautzky; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2020-09