Tobias Staiger1, Tamara Waldmann1, Nathalie Oexle1, Moritz Wigand1, Nicolas Rüsch2. 1. Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Günzburg, Parkstrasse 11, 89073, Ulm, Germany. 2. Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Günzburg, Parkstrasse 11, 89073, Ulm, Germany. nicolas.ruesch@uni-ulm.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The everyday lives of unemployed people with mental health problems can be affected by multiple discrimination, but studies about double stigma-an overlap of identities and experiences of discrimination-in this group are lacking. We therefore studied multiple discrimination among unemployed people with mental health problems and its consequences for job- and help-seeking behaviors. METHODS: Everyday discrimination and attributions of discrimination to unemployment and/or to mental health problems were examined among 301 unemployed individuals with mental health problems. Job search self-efficacy, barriers to care, and perceived need for treatment were compared among four subgroups, depending on attributions of experienced discrimination to unemployment and to mental health problems (group i); neither to unemployment nor to mental health problems (group ii); mainly to unemployment (group iii); or mainly to mental health problems (group iv). RESULTS: In multiple regressions among all participants, higher levels of discrimination predicted reduced job search self-efficacy and higher barriers to care; and attributions of discrimination to unemployment were associated with increased barriers to care. In ANOVAs for subgroup comparisons, group i participants, who attributed discrimination to both unemployment and mental health problems, reported lower job search self-efficacy, more perceived stigma-related barriers to care and more need for treatment than group iii participants, as well as more stigma-related barriers to care than group iv. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple discrimination may affect job search and help-seeking among unemployed individuals with mental health problems. Interventions to reduce public stigma and to improve coping with multiple discrimination for this group should be developed.
PURPOSE: The everyday lives of unemployed people with mental health problems can be affected by multiple discrimination, but studies about double stigma-an overlap of identities and experiences of discrimination-in this group are lacking. We therefore studied multiple discrimination among unemployed people with mental health problems and its consequences for job- and help-seeking behaviors. METHODS: Everyday discrimination and attributions of discrimination to unemployment and/or to mental health problems were examined among 301 unemployed individuals with mental health problems. Job search self-efficacy, barriers to care, and perceived need for treatment were compared among four subgroups, depending on attributions of experienced discrimination to unemployment and to mental health problems (group i); neither to unemployment nor to mental health problems (group ii); mainly to unemployment (group iii); or mainly to mental health problems (group iv). RESULTS: In multiple regressions among all participants, higher levels of discrimination predicted reduced job search self-efficacy and higher barriers to care; and attributions of discrimination to unemployment were associated with increased barriers to care. In ANOVAs for subgroup comparisons, group i participants, who attributed discrimination to both unemployment and mental health problems, reported lower job search self-efficacy, more perceived stigma-related barriers to care and more need for treatment than group iii participants, as well as more stigma-related barriers to care than group iv. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple discrimination may affect job search and help-seeking among unemployed individuals with mental health problems. Interventions to reduce public stigma and to improve coping with multiple discrimination for this group should be developed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Help-seeking; Job search; Mental health problems; Multiple discrimination; Unemployment
Authors: Nicolas Rüsch; Patrick W Corrigan; Tamara Waldmann; Tobias Staiger; Andreas Bahemann; Nathalie Oexle; Moritz Wigand; Thomas Becker Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Diana Frasquilho; Margarida Gaspar Matos; Ferdinand Salonna; Diogo Guerreiro; Cláudia C Storti; Tânia Gaspar; José M Caldas-de-Almeida Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Pan Chen; Xiu Jun Liu; Xiao Qin Wang; Bing Xiang Yang; Juan Ruan; Zhongchun Liu Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Ikenna D Ebuenyi; Barbara J Regeer; David M Ndetei; Joske F G Bunders-Aelen; Mònica Guxens Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2019-04-05 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Steven P Meanley; Michael W Plankey; Derrick D Matthews; Mary E Hawk; James E Egan; Linda A Teplin; Steven J Shoptaw; Pamela J Surkan; Ron D Stall Journal: J Homosex Date: 2019-12-20