Importance: Each year, cellulitis leads to 650 000 hospital admissions and is estimated to cost $3.7 billion in the United States. Previous literature has demonstrated a high misdiagnosis rate for cellulitis, which results in unnecessary antibiotic use and health care cost. Objective: To determine whether dermatologic consultation decreases duration of hospital stay or intravenous antibiotic treatment duration in patients with cellulitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in a large urban tertiary care hospital between October 2012 and January 2017, with 1-month follow-up duration. Patients were randomized to the control group, which received the standard of care (ie, treatment by primary medicine team), or the intervention group, which received dermatology consultation. Medical chart review of demographic information and hospital courses was performed. Adult patients hospitalized with presumed diagnosis of cellulitis were eligible. A total of 1300 patients were screened, 1125 were excluded, and 175 were included. Statistical analysis was employed to identify significant outcome differences between the 2 groups. Interventions: Dermatology consultation within 24 hours of hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Length of hospital stay and duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment. Results: Of 175 participants, 70 (40%) were women and 105 (60%) were men. The mean age was 58.8 years. Length of hospital stay was not statistically different between the 2 groups. The duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment (<4 days: 86.4% vs 72.5%; absolute difference, 13.9%; 95% CI, 1.9%-25.9%; P = .04) and duration of total antibiotic treatment was significantly lower in patients who had early dermatology consultation (<10 days: 50.6% vs 32.5%; absolute difference, 18.1%; 95% CI, 3.7%-32.5%; P = .01). Clinical improvement at 2 weeks was significantly higher for those in the intervention group (79 [89.3%] vs 59 [68.3%]; absolute difference, 21.0%; 95% CI, 9.3%-32.7%; P < .001). There was no significant difference in 1-month readmission rate between the groups (4 [4.5%] vs 6 [6.9%]; absolute difference, -2.4%; 95% CI, -9.3% to 4.5%; P = .54). In the intervention group, the rate of cellulitis misdiagnosis was 30.7% (27 of 88 participants). Among the entire cohort, 101 (57.7%) patients were treated with courses of antibiotics longer than what is recommended by guidelines. Conclusions and Relevance: Early dermatologic consultation can improve outcomes in patients with suspected cellulitis by identifying alternate diagnoses, treating modifiable risk factors, and decreasing length of antibiotic treatment. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01706913.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Each year, cellulitis leads to 650 000 hospital admissions and is estimated to cost $3.7 billion in the United States. Previous literature has demonstrated a high misdiagnosis rate for cellulitis, which results in unnecessary antibiotic use and health care cost. Objective: To determine whether dermatologic consultation decreases duration of hospital stay or intravenous antibiotic treatment duration in patients with cellulitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in a large urban tertiary care hospital between October 2012 and January 2017, with 1-month follow-up duration. Patients were randomized to the control group, which received the standard of care (ie, treatment by primary medicine team), or the intervention group, which received dermatology consultation. Medical chart review of demographic information and hospital courses was performed. Adult patients hospitalized with presumed diagnosis of cellulitis were eligible. A total of 1300 patients were screened, 1125 were excluded, and 175 were included. Statistical analysis was employed to identify significant outcome differences between the 2 groups. Interventions: Dermatology consultation within 24 hours of hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Length of hospital stay and duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment. Results: Of 175 participants, 70 (40%) were women and 105 (60%) were men. The mean age was 58.8 years. Length of hospital stay was not statistically different between the 2 groups. The duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment (<4 days: 86.4% vs 72.5%; absolute difference, 13.9%; 95% CI, 1.9%-25.9%; P = .04) and duration of total antibiotic treatment was significantly lower in patients who had early dermatology consultation (<10 days: 50.6% vs 32.5%; absolute difference, 18.1%; 95% CI, 3.7%-32.5%; P = .01). Clinical improvement at 2 weeks was significantly higher for those in the intervention group (79 [89.3%] vs 59 [68.3%]; absolute difference, 21.0%; 95% CI, 9.3%-32.7%; P < .001). There was no significant difference in 1-month readmission rate between the groups (4 [4.5%] vs 6 [6.9%]; absolute difference, -2.4%; 95% CI, -9.3% to 4.5%; P = .54). In the intervention group, the rate of cellulitis misdiagnosis was 30.7% (27 of 88 participants). Among the entire cohort, 101 (57.7%) patients were treated with courses of antibiotics longer than what is recommended by guidelines. Conclusions and Relevance: Early dermatologic consultation can improve outcomes in patients with suspected cellulitis by identifying alternate diagnoses, treating modifiable risk factors, and decreasing length of antibiotic treatment. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01706913.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Shilpa R Jain; Seyed M Hosseini-Moghaddam; Philip Dwek; Kaveri Gupta; Sameer Elsayed; Guy W Thompson; Robert Dagnone; Kelly Hutt; Michael Silverman Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 2.803
Authors: Kathryn A Volz; Louisa Canham; Emily Kaplan; Leon D Sanchez; Nathan I Shapiro; Shamai A Grossman Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Matthew J Hepburn; David P Dooley; Peter J Skidmore; Michael W Ellis; William F Starnes; William C Hasewinkle Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2004 Aug 9-23
Authors: Isabelle M Sanchez; Stefan Lowenstein; Kelly A Johnson; Jennifer Babik; Carter Haag; Jesse J Keller; Alex G Ortega-Loayza; Jarish Cohen; Timothy H McCalmont; Addison M Demer; Matthew D Mansh; Sara A Hylwa; Jing Liu; Kanade Shinkai Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Jesse D Sutton; Ronald Carico; Muriel Burk; Makoto M Jones; XiangMing Wei; Melinda M Neuhauser; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Kelly L Echevarria; Emily S Spivak; Francesca E Cunningham Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Adam B Raff; Antonio Ortega-Martinez; Sidharth Chand; Renajd Rrapi; Carina Thomas; Lauren N Ko; Anna C Garza-Mayers; Allison S Dobry; Blair Alden Parry; Richard Rox Anderson; Daniela Kroshinsky Journal: JID Innov Date: 2021-06-08
Authors: Ariana Ellis; Steven D Billings; Urmi Khanna; Christine B Warren; Melissa Piliang; Alok Vij; Jennifer S Ko; Wilma F Bergfeld; Anthony P Fernandez Journal: J Cutan Pathol Date: 2019-12-26 Impact factor: 1.458