| Literature DB >> 28162827 |
Shilpa R Jain1, Seyed M Hosseini-Moghaddam2, Philip Dwek3, Kaveri Gupta2, Sameer Elsayed2, Guy W Thompson2, Robert Dagnone4, Kelly Hutt5, Michael Silverman2.
Abstract
Three hospital emergency rooms (ERs) routinely referred all cases of cellulitis requiring outpatient intravenous antibiotics, to a central ER-staffed cellulitis clinic. We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients seen by the ER clinic in the last 4months preceding a policy change (ER management cohort [ERMC]) (n=149) and all those seen in the first 3months of a new policy of automatic referral to an infectious disease (ID) specialist-supervised cellulitis clinic (ID management cohort [IDMC]) (n=136). Fifty-four (40%) of 136 patients in the IDMC were given an alternative diagnosis (noncellulitis), compared to 16 (11%) of 149 in the ERMC (P<0.0001). Logistic regression-demonstrated rates of disease recurrence were lower in the IDMC than the ERMC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.06; P=0.003), as were rates of hospitalization (HR, 0.11; P=0.01). There was no significant difference in mortality. Automatic ID consultation for cellulitis was beneficial in differentiating mimickers from true cellulitis, reducing recurrence, and preventing hospital admissions.Entities:
Keywords: Automatic consult policy; Cellulitis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28162827 DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.12.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ISSN: 0732-8893 Impact factor: 2.803