Yu-Han Chiu1, Andrea Bellavia2, Tamarra James-Todd3, Katharine F Correia4, Linda Valeri5, Carmen Messerlian2, Jennifer B Ford2, Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón2, Antonia M Calafat6, Russ Hauser7, Paige L Williams8. 1. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Electronic address: yuc187@mail.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA. 5. Laboratory for Psychiatric Biostatistics, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA 02478, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA. 6. National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. 7. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA. 8. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Electronic address: paige@hsph.harvard.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We applied three statistical approaches for evaluating associations between prenatal urinary concentrations of a mixture of phthalate metabolites and birth weight. METHODS: We included 300 women who provided 732 urine samples during pregnancy and delivered a singleton infant. We measured urinary concentrations of metabolites of di(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate, di-isobutyl-, di-n-butyl-, butylbenzyl-, and diethyl phthalates. We applied 1) linear regressions; 2) classification methods [principal component analysis (PCA) and structural equation models (SEM)]; and 3) Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR), to evaluate associations between phthalate metabolite mixtures and birth weight adjusting for potential confounders. Data were presented as mean differences (95% CI) in birth weight (grams) as each phthalate increased from the 10th to the 90th percentile. RESULTS: When analyzing individual phthalate metabolites using linear regressions, each metabolite demonstrated a modest inverse association with birth weight [from -93 (-206, 21) to -49 (-164, 65)]. When simultaneously including all metabolites in a multivariable model, inflation of the estimates and standard errors were noted. PCA identified two principal components, both inversely associated with birth weight [-23 (-68, 22), -27 (-71, 17), respectively]. These inverse associations were confirmed when applying SEM. BKMR further identified that monoethyl and mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and phthalate concentrations were linearly related to lower birth weight [-51(-164, 63) and -122 (-311, 67), respectively], and suggested no evidence of interaction between metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: While none of the methods produced significant results, we demonstrated the potential issues arising using linear regression models in the context of correlated exposures. Among the other selected approaches, classification techniques identified common sources of exposures with implications for interventions, while BKMR further identified specific contributions of individual metabolites.
OBJECTIVES: We applied three statistical approaches for evaluating associations between prenatal urinary concentrations of a mixture of phthalate metabolites and birth weight. METHODS: We included 300 women who provided 732 urine samples during pregnancy and delivered a singleton infant. We measured urinary concentrations of metabolites of di(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate, di-isobutyl-, di-n-butyl-, butylbenzyl-, and diethyl phthalates. We applied 1) linear regressions; 2) classification methods [principal component analysis (PCA) and structural equation models (SEM)]; and 3) Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR), to evaluate associations between phthalate metabolite mixtures and birth weight adjusting for potential confounders. Data were presented as mean differences (95% CI) in birth weight (grams) as each phthalate increased from the 10th to the 90th percentile. RESULTS: When analyzing individual phthalate metabolites using linear regressions, each metabolite demonstrated a modest inverse association with birth weight [from -93 (-206, 21) to -49 (-164, 65)]. When simultaneously including all metabolites in a multivariable model, inflation of the estimates and standard errors were noted. PCA identified two principal components, both inversely associated with birth weight [-23 (-68, 22), -27 (-71, 17), respectively]. These inverse associations were confirmed when applying SEM. BKMR further identified that monoethyl and mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and phthalate concentrations were linearly related to lower birth weight [-51(-164, 63) and -122 (-311, 67), respectively], and suggested no evidence of interaction between metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: While none of the methods produced significant results, we demonstrated the potential issues arising using linear regression models in the context of correlated exposures. Among the other selected approaches, classification techniques identified common sources of exposures with implications for interventions, while BKMR further identified specific contributions of individual metabolites.
Authors: Carmen Messerlian; Joseph M Braun; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Paige L Williams; Jennifer B Ford; Vicente Mustieles; Antonia M Calafat; Irene Souter; Thomas Toth; Russ Hauser Journal: Environ Int Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Mary S Wolff; Stephanie M Engel; Gertrud S Berkowitz; Xiaoyun Ye; Manori J Silva; Chenbo Zhu; James Wetmur; Antonia M Calafat Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Carmen Messerlian; Andrea Bellavia; Audrey J Gaskins; Yu-Han Chiu; Jennifer B Ford; Alexandra R Azevedo; John C Petrozza; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser; Paige L Williams Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Yinnan Zheng; Cuilin Zhang; Marc G Weisskopf; Paige L Williams; Birgit Claus Henn; Patrick J Parsons; Christopher D Palmer; Germaine M Buck Louis; Tamarra James-Todd Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2019-12-28 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Pooja Tyagi; Tamarra James-Todd; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Jennifer B Ford; Myra Keller; John Petrozza; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser; Paige L Williams; Andrea Bellavia Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-12-25 Impact factor: 6.498