Literature DB >> 29452282

Load-sharing through elastic micro-motion accelerates bone formation and interbody fusion.

Eric H Ledet1, Glenn P Sanders2, Darryl J DiRisio3, Joseph C Glennon4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Achieving a successful spinal fusion requires the proper biological and biomechanical environment. Optimizing load-sharing in the interbody space can enhance bone formation. For anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), loading and motion are largely dictated by the stiffness of the plate, which can facilitate a balance between stability and load-sharing. The advantages of load-sharing may be substantial for patients with comorbidities and in multilevel procedures where pseudarthrosis rates are significant.
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a novel elastically deformable, continuously load-sharing anterior cervical spinal plate for promotion of bone formation and interbody fusion relative to a translationally dynamic plate. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: An in vivo animal model was used to evaluate the effects of an elastically deformable spinal plate on bone formation and spine fusion.
METHODS: Fourteen goats underwent an ACDF and received either a translationally dynamic or elastically deformable plate. Animals were followed up until 18 weeks and were evaluated by plain x-ray, computed tomography scan, and undecalcified histology to evaluate the rate and quality of bone formation and interbody fusion.
RESULTS: Animals treated with the elastically deformable plate demonstrated statistically significantly superior early bone formation relative to the translationally dynamic plate. Trends in the data from 8 to 18 weeks postoperatively suggest that the elastically deformable implant enhanced bony bridging and fusion, but these enhancements were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Load-sharing through elastic micro-motion accelerates bone formation in the challenging goat ACDF model. The elastically deformable implant used in this study may promote early bony bridging and increased rates of fusion, but future studies will be necessary to comprehensively characterize the advantages of load-sharing through micro-motion.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior; Cervical; Fusion; Load-sharing; Micro-motion; Plate

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29452282      PMCID: PMC6008179          DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  43 in total

1.  Load sharing in Premier and Zephir anterior cervical plates.

Authors:  Andrew J Rapoff; Bryan P Conrad; Wesley M Johnson; Andrew Cordista; Glenn R Rechtine
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians.

Authors:  Harold M Frost
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 3.  Animal models for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Inneke H Drespe; Gert K Polzhofer; A Simon Turner; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 4.  Smoking and the human vertebral column: a review of the impact of cigarette use on vertebral bone metabolism and spinal fusion.

Authors:  M N Hadley; S V Reddy
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Mechanical influences in bone remodeling. Experimental research on Wolff's law.

Authors:  A Chamay; P Tschantz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  In Vivo Study of Hydroxyapatite-coated Hat Type Cervical Intervertebral Fusion Cage Combined With IGF-I and TGF-β1 in the Goat Model.

Authors:  Yutong Gu; Feng Zhang; William C Lineaweaver; Jian Zhang; Lianshun Jia; Jin Qi; Jun Wang; Xuebin Zhen
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation.

Authors:  C H Turner; M R Forwood; J Y Rho; T Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Are animal models useful for studying human disc disorders/degeneration?

Authors:  Mauro Alini; Stephen M Eisenstein; Keita Ito; Christopher Little; A Annette Kettler; Koichi Masuda; James Melrose; Jim Ralphs; Ian Stokes; Hans Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. A comparison of techniques in an animal model.

Authors:  T A Zdeblick; D Wilson; M E Cooke; D N Kunz; R McCabe; M J Ulm; R Vanderby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures.

Authors:  A E Goodship; J Kenwright
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1985-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  Critical Evaluation of Biomechanical Principles and Radiographic Indicators for Fusion Assessment in a Novel Conformable Porous Mesh Implant.

Authors:  Lisa Ferrara; William Ford; Pierce D Nunley; Barbara D Boyan; Marcus B Stone
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

2.  Load Share Mapping for Traditional PEEK vs Novel Hybrid PEEK With Expandable Porous Mesh Intervertebral Devices.

Authors:  Lisa A Ferrara; Pierce D Nunley; Marcus B Stone
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

Review 3.  Scaffolds and coatings for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Helena Filipa Pereira; Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz; Filipe Samuel Silva; Rui Luís Reis; Joaquim Miguel Oliveira
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Posterior spinal instrumentation and decompression with or without cross-link?

Authors:  Marco D Burkhard; Frédéric Cornaz; José Miguel Spirig; Florian Wanivenhaus; Rafael Loucas; Marie-Rosa Fasser; Jonas Widmer; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2021-11-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.