| Literature DB >> 29451148 |
Hong-Xia Li1, Xiao-Chun Zheng1, Si-Yao Chen2, Ying Liao1, Zhen-Hui Han3, Pan Huang1, Chu-Fan Sun1, Jia Liu1, Jing-Yuan Song1, Chao-Shu Tang4, Jun-Bao Du1, Yong-Hong Chen1, Hong-Fang Jin1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the changes and significance of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in patients with POTS.Entities:
Keywords: Blood Pressure; Children; Pathogenesis; Postural Tachycardia Syndrome; Sulfur Dioxide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29451148 PMCID: PMC5830828 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.225051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) ISSN: 0366-6999 Impact factor: 2.628
Demographic characteristics, hemodynamics, and plasma SO2
| Items | Control ( | POTS ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 11/16 | 11/20 | 0.169 | >0.05 |
| Age (years) | 12.0 ± 0.8 | 12.3 ± 2.3 | 0.702 | >0.05 |
| Height (cm) | 145.3 ± 10.4 | 157.9 ± 15.8 | 3.551 | <0.01 |
| Weight (kg) | 42.4 ± 7.32 | 48.8 ± 15.4 | 1.973 | >0.05 |
| Supine SBP (mmHg) | 107.1 ± 10.0 | 109.2 ± 15.8 | 0.618 | >0.05 |
| Supine DBP (mmHg) | 67.3 ± 7.9 | 65.7 ± 11.6 | −0.597 | >0.05 |
| Supine HR (bpm) | 83.9 ± 7.3 | 76.8 ± 10.0 | −3.052 | <0.01 |
| HRmax (bpm) | 104.2 ± 7.1 | 124.2 ± 10.3 | 8.473 | <0.01 |
| Upright SBP (mmHg) | 112.1 ± 10.0 | 106.2 ± 15.6 | −1.679 | >0.05 |
| Upright DBP (mmHg) | 73.0 ± 8.4 | 71.0 ± 11.1 | −0.789 | >0.05 |
| Basal plasma SO2 (µmol/L) | 27.2 ± 9.6 | 64.0 ± 20.8 | 8.439 | <0.01 |
All data were shown as mean ± SD or n. POTS: Postural tachycardia syndrome; SBP: Systolic pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; HR: Heart rate; HRmax: Maximum heart rate; SO2: Sulfur dioxide.
Figure 1The ROC curve of the plasma SO2 level for the diagnosis of POTS. The longitudinal axis represents the sensitivity in the diagnosis of POTS. The transverse axis represents the false-positive rate (1-specificity) of the diagnosis. The area under the curve was 96.7% (95% confidence interval: 0.928–1.000; P < 0.01). ROC: Receiver operating characteristic; SO2: Sulfur dioxide; POTS: Postural tachycardia syndrome.
Figure 2Correlation analysis between symptom scores and plasma SO2 levels and between maximum HR and plasma SO2 levels in patients. (a) Correlation analysis between symptom scores and plasma SO2 levels in children with POTS. Symptom scores and plasma SO2 levels were positively correlated in the POTS group (n = 31, r = 0.398, P < 0.05). (b) Correlation analysis of the maximum HR and plasma SO2 levels. In all the study participants, the maximum HR was positively correlated with the plasma SO2 level (n = 58, r = 0.679, P < 0.01). SO2: Sulfur dioxide; POTS: Postural tachycardia syndrome; HR: Heart rate.
Figure 3Blood pressure and plasma SO2 analysis. (a) Comparison of the ΔSBP between the POTS and control groups. The difference in the ΔSBP between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.01). (b) The correlation between ΔSBP and plasma SO2 in all participants (n = 58, r = −0.28, P < 0.05). (c) Correlation analysis of ΔSBP and plasma SO2 levels in the control group (n = 27, r = 0.487, P < 0.01). SO2: Sulfur dioxide; POTS: Postural tachycardia syndrome; ΔSBP: Systolic blood pressure from the supine to upright.