Literature DB >> 29450791

Face processing skills predict faithfulness of portraits drawn by novices.

Christel Devue1, Gina M Grimshaw2.   

Abstract

Individuals show astonishing variability in their face recognition abilities, and the causes and consequences of this heterogeneity are unclear. Special expertise with faces, for example in portraitists, is associated with advantages on face processing tasks, especially those involving perceptual abilities. Do face processing skills improve through practice, or does drawing skill reflect pre-existing individual differences? If the latter, then the association between face processing skills and production of faithful portraits should also exist in people without practice in drawing. Two exploratory studies and one follow-up confirmatory study provide support for this hypothesis. Drawing ability of novices was predicted by their performance on face recognition tasks involving perceptual discrimination and visual short-term memory, but not by those that rely more heavily on long-term memory or memory for non-face objects. By examining non-experts, we show that expertise with faces might build upon pre-existing individual differences in face processing skills.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drawing; Expertise; Face processing; Individual differences; Perceptual discrimination; Plasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29450791     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1435-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

1.  The Cambridge Car Memory Test: a task matched in format to the Cambridge Face Memory Test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects.

Authors:  Hugh W Dennett; Elinor McKone; Raka Tavashmi; Ashleigh Hall; Madeleine Pidcock; Mark Edwards; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-06

2.  Face ethnicity and measurement reliability affect face recognition performance in developmental prosopagnosia: evidence from the Cambridge Face Memory Test-Australian.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Ashleigh Hall; Madeleine Pidcock; Romina Palermo; Ross B Wilkinson; Davide Rivolta; Galit Yovel; Joshua M Davis; Kirsty B O'Connor
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Segmentation and accuracy in copying and drawing: experts and beginners.

Authors:  John Tchalenko
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Family resemblance: ten family members with prosopagnosia and within-class object agnosia.

Authors:  Bradley Duchaine; Laura Germine; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Are portrait artists superior face recognizers? Limited impact of adult experience on face recognition ability.

Authors:  Jeremy J Tree; Ruth Horry; Howard Riley; Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Perceptual expertise in forensic facial image comparison.

Authors:  David White; P Jonathon Phillips; Carina A Hahn; Matthew Hill; Alice J O'Toole
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Do people have insight into their face recognition abilities?

Authors:  Romina Palermo; Bruno Rossion; Gillian Rhodes; Renaud Laguesse; Tolga Tez; Bronwyn Hall; Andrea Albonico; Manuela Malaspina; Roberta Daini; Jessica Irons; Shahd Al-Janabi; Libby C Taylor; Davide Rivolta; Elinor McKone
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Drawing cartoon faces--a functional imaging study of the cognitive neuroscience of drawing.

Authors:  R Chris Miall; Emma Gowen; John Tchalenko
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 9.  Beyond perceptual expertise: revisiting the neural substrates of expert object recognition.

Authors:  Assaf Harel; Dwight Kravitz; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Detecting Superior Face Recognition Skills in a Large Sample of Young British Adults.

Authors:  Anna K Bobak; Philip Pampoulov; Sarah Bate
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-22
View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating Medical Devices Remotely: Current Methods and Potential Innovations.

Authors:  Anne Collins McLaughlin; Patricia R DeLucia; Frank A Drews; Monifa Vaughn-Cooke; Anil Kumar; Robert R Nesbitt; Kevin Cluff
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.888

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.