Literature DB >> 26935244

Do people have insight into their face recognition abilities?

Romina Palermo1,2,3, Bruno Rossion4,5, Gillian Rhodes1,2, Renaud Laguesse4,5, Tolga Tez3, Bronwyn Hall3, Andrea Albonico6,7, Manuela Malaspina6,7, Roberta Daini6,7, Jessica Irons3, Shahd Al-Janabi7, Libby C Taylor1,2, Davide Rivolta7, Elinor McKone1,3.   

Abstract

Diagnosis of developmental or congenital prosopagnosia (CP) involves self-report of everyday face recognition difficulties, which are corroborated with poor performance on behavioural tests. This approach requires accurate self-evaluation. We examine the extent to which typical adults have insight into their face recognition abilities across four experiments involving nearly 300 participants. The experiments used five tests of face recognition ability: two that tap into the ability to learn and recognize previously unfamiliar faces [the Cambridge Face Memory Test, CFMT; Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2006). The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia, 44(4), 576-585. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001; and a newly devised test based on the CFMT but where the study phases involve watching short movies rather than viewing static faces-the CFMT-Films] and three that tap face matching [Benton Facial Recognition Test, BFRT; Benton, A., Sivan, A., Hamsher, K., Varney, N., & Spreen, O. (1983). Contribution to neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; and two recently devised sequential face matching tests]. Self-reported ability was measured with the 15-item Kennerknecht et al. questionnaire [Kennerknecht, I., Ho, N. Y., & Wong, V. C. (2008). Prevalence of hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA) in Hong Kong Chinese population. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 146A(22), 2863-2870. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.32552]; two single-item questions assessing face recognition ability; and a new 77-item meta-cognition questionnaire. Overall, we find that adults with typical face recognition abilities have only modest insight into their ability to recognize faces on behavioural tests. In a fifth experiment, we assess self-reported face recognition ability in people with CP and find that some people who expect to perform poorly on behavioural tests of face recognition do indeed perform poorly. However, it is not yet clear whether individuals within this group of poor performers have greater levels of insight (i.e., into their degree of impairment) than those with more typical levels of performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Face perception; Individual differences; Metacognition; Prosopagnosia; Self-evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26935244     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1161058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  20 in total

1.  Self-reported face recognition is highly valid, but alone is not highly discriminative of prosopagnosia-level performance on objective assessments.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Elyana Saad; Ayooluwa O Douglas; Laura Germine; Jeremy B Wilmer; Joseph M DeGutis
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-06

2.  Face processing skills predict faithfulness of portraits drawn by novices.

Authors:  Christel Devue; Gina M Grimshaw
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

3.  The Face-Processing Network Is Resilient to Focal Resection of Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Kevin S Weiner; Jacques Jonas; Jesse Gomez; Louis Maillard; Hélène Brissart; Gabriela Hossu; Corentin Jacques; David Loftus; Sophie Colnat-Coulbois; Anthony Stigliani; Michael A Barnett; Kalanit Grill-Spector; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  People have modest, not good, insight into their face recognition ability: a comparison between self-report questionnaires.

Authors:  Daisuke Matsuyoshi; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-05-20

5.  Detecting Superior Face Recognition Skills in a Large Sample of Young British Adults.

Authors:  Anna K Bobak; Philip Pampoulov; Sarah Bate
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-22

6.  Robust associations between the 20-item prosopagnosia index and the Cambridge Face Memory Test in the general population.

Authors:  Katie L H Gray; Geoffrey Bird; Richard Cook
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Use-inspired basic research on individual differences in face identification: implications for criminal investigation and security.

Authors:  Karen Lander; Vicki Bruce; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27

8.  Identifying Hallmark Symptoms of Developmental Prosopagnosia for Non-Experts.

Authors:  Ebony Murray; Peter J Hills; Rachel J Bennetts; Sarah Bate
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  How robust is familiar face recognition? A repeat detection study of more than 1000 faces.

Authors:  Angus F Chapman; Hannah Hawkins-Elder; Tirta Susilo
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Forgetting faces over a week: investigating self-reported face recognition ability and personality.

Authors:  Robin S S Kramer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.